Prime Minister Paul Martin supported Canadian involvement in the initiative when he was a leadership candidate, but has avoided moving forward without Conservative support.
Bush unexpectedly asked Martin pointed questions about Canada's refusal to sign during their meeting, but it's now clear the prime minister wasn't the only Canadian political leader to get the Bush treatment.
Harper didn't deny being pressured by Bush last Nov. 30 during their half-hour meeting. But he said it appeared someone had misled the president about Conservative policy.
"It was clear to me at the outset of our conversation that the president had been misinformed about our position," Harper said in an interview.
That position, Harper replied, is not hostile to missile defence. But it will force the Liberals to properly explain the plan before bringing it to Parliament.
Read More:
http://www.mytelus.com/news/article.do?pageID=news_home&articleID=1851346
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on February 20, 2005]
---
"We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"
---
"We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"
Moreover, the fact bush has stuck his cocaine encrusted nose into our affairs in a weak and ill-informed attempt to peddle influence among these two party leaders simply can not make neither Martin's nor Harper's job at selling this to us any easier.
In short, bush in himself is the most effective example why BMD is of no benefit to Canada... How do people manage to listen to anything he says without pulling out their hair?
G
* the politics behind Canada BMD fails, by design. Another chapter added re: the above from "CP"
* North Korea has nukes and missile technology, but they are left alone.
* At some point in the future, at the conveniance of the USA/UK/Israel, a guided, nuclear tipped missile enters Canada from the Arctic.
* Targets are many. Certainly USA targets. In Canada, the most likely city to be nuked, is Calgary. Why Calgary? Because this city is the administrative capital in Canada for oil/gas. The work being done in this city can be easily performed in Houston.
* N Korea gets blamed.
* Canada gets blamed for not having BMD
* USA and Israel benefits.
* Who is responsible? Israel. The nuke comes from one of their subs.
ps: I refuse to live in Calgary because of this 'fear'
Why would Calgary be nuked when the U.S. already owns the oil?
Are you insane?
<br />
<br />
Israel does not have nuclear-armed subs. They have German-built diesel subs.
As to the insane comment, yeah, i'm a nutter. so what