The article did NOT mention that COAT has created a web petition to oppose
CPP war investments. If you haven't yet signed, please do so, and encourage
others to do likewise:
http://coat.openconcept.ca
Please respond to the Ottawa Citizen article (see below) with a letter to
the editor:
letters@thecitizen.canwest.com
http://www.canada.com/ottawa/ottawacitizen/letters.html
Ottawa Citizen
1101 Baxter Road
Box 5020
Ottawa, ON
K2C 3M4
=== === === === === === === === === === === ===
To order a copy of COAT's 50-page report:
"Operation Embedded Complicity:
Canada, Playing our Part in the Business of War"
just send $5 to:
COAT, 541 McLeod St., Ottawa ON K1R 5R2
(Or subscribe: 1 year=$20, 2 years=$36)
=== === === === === === === === === === === ===
Here's the Ottawa Citizen article:
Invest pension fund ethically: NDP motion
CPP's billions should support Canadian values, says Pat Martin
By Bill Curry
The Ottawa Citizen, Sunday, February 08, 2004
The Canada Pension Plan reserve fund, which is predicted to swell beyond $160 billion within a decade, should be forced into ethical investments rather than supporting companies such as military suppliers and tobacco makers, states a new motion tabled in the Commons by the NDP.
In light of recent reforms to the program to ensure it can support the retiring baby boom generation, increased premiums have boosted the fund to its current $64.7-billion. NDP MP Pat Martin said the ballooning fund means its investments now have a significant impact on the economy and Canadians should have a debate over whether the Canada Pension Plan Investment Review Board needs guidelines regarding how it invests their money.
"There are lots of Canadians who refuse to invest in tobacco companies for all kinds of ethical reasons who will be really upset to learn there's nothing stopping the CPP from doing that," said Mr. Martin.
CPP funds have gradually been transferred to the board since it was created in 1999 with a mandate to invest in private equities.
The NDP MP points out that many Canadians pride themselves for not supporting the U.S.-led war in Iraq, yet the fund has about $600-million invested in U.S. military contractors, such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon and General Dynamics.
"It's absolutely shocking. I mean, part of the Chretien legacy was staying out of the war in Iraq. Well, we've been inadvertently participating in the war in Iraq all along through our Canada Pension Plan. It's disingenuous to Canadians."
The motion introduced by Mr. Martin last week calls for the Canada Pension Plan Investment Review Board to be "prohibited from investing in companies and enterprises that manufacture and trade in military arms and weapons, have records of poor environmental and labour practices or whose conduct and practices are contrary to Canadian values."
With the current session of Parliament expected to be cut short for an election, the motion is not expected to come to a vote in the near future, but NDP leader Jack Layton has said the idea will be part of his party's campaign platform.
Mr. Martin argues that if the CPP is going to be investing in the stock market, it should use "ethical funds" which have various screens to weed out companies such as military contractors, tobacco and alcohol producers and companies engaged in child labour.
"The ethical mutual funds have in some cases outperformed the general funds, but what we need to take into account with our pension plan is that we could be achieving necessary secondary objectives that may be more difficult to measure," he said.Mr. Martin's other investment suggestions include using the fund to build social housing and then collecting returns through mortgages, lending money to municipalities for green infrastructure like public transit and generating profit from the interest, or funding energy retrofits for government buildings and collecting the energy savings.
Mr. Martin said his motion was inspired by a recent study by the Coalition to Oppose the Arms Trade, which linked CPP investments to top U.S. military contractors.
Fred Ketchen, director of equity trading for Scotia McLeod, questioned Mr. Martin's proposal, pointing out that "ethical" mutual funds have traditionally underperformed traditional funds. Also, Mr. Ketchen said maximizing returns for Canada's seniors could be considered a social goal in itself.
"I know that it's tough for those people who may think that some of their Canada Pension Plan money is being invested in God knows what -- Rothmans or Molsons or Lockheed Martin or Boeing -- but I thought the Canada Pension Plan was supposed to represent all Canadians," he said.
Mr. Ketchen said ethical funds will likely always underperform traditional funds because they go against the main rule of investing, which is to have as diverse a portfolio as possible.
"I admire people who have that philosophy but if I was running a pension plan, I'd be looking for the best results that I could get from all sectors with diversification," he said. Mr. Ketchen added that Canadians should not be surprised that the CPP has lost money since entering the stock market, because it has been a down period for all investors.
CPP Investment Board spokesman John Cappelletti said federal legislation requires the board to focus only on maximizing returns and that changing the legislation would not be easy.
"It would take more than Parliament," he said, pointing out that the federal government would also have to secure the support of two-thirds of the nine participating provinces representing two-thirds of the population.
The Ottawa Citizen, Sunday Feb. 8, 2004, p. 3
Reprinted here for fair use only
=== === === === === === === === === === === ===
In related news:
Physicians for a Smoke-free Canada has just launched a web petition focusing on CPP investments in tobacco industries: http://www.smoke-free.ca/lifesavings/cpp
Sign their petition:
http://www.smoke-free.ca/lifesavings/cpp/petition.html
Note: http://coat.openconcept.ca
letters@thecitizen.canw...
http://www.canada.com/o...
http://www.smoke-free.c...

Dr Caleb--there\'s something called the \"Sudan discount\"--meaning companies that engage in shady practices or work in unstable countries (eg like Talisman did in the Sudan) can see a very real and very negative effect on their earnings. 60 minutes did a documentary on this related to the US just recently. Ethical investments do in fact make good business sense, and many giant companies are able to follow ethical guidelines with no problems. There are any number of companies that advise corporations on how to invest ethically and some representatives of these companies have stated that it would not be difficult for the CPPIB to do the same. \"Don\'t invest in products that kill people\" is a good and uncontroversial start.
And you have to realize that the CPPIB isn\'t just investing in a few bad companies--they are investing in almost every one of the top ten US weapons contractors, including Lockheed Martin, not to mention the \"ex-President\'s club\", the Carlyle Group, which has deep ties to George W. A number of the companies have contributed significantly to Canadian political campaigns as well, which is also explained by COAT. And there is no way for Canadians to conscientiously object to giving their money to these companies, since they are taken off our paycheques automatically, meaning our dollars are going directly and without our choice to corporations and American corprations specifically who are buying political influence, eroding sovereignty, and profiting from war. In many cases these companies are acting in direct contravention of Canadian policy, such as the decision to stay out of the war on Iraq or not to build landmines, which we signed a treaty against doing in any way.
It\'s called the military-industrial complex. If we are putting our CPP money directly and without choice into the hands of companies who have a vested interest in militarism and certain policies, where is our democracy then? Where is our sovereignty?
The CPPIB, after all, wasn\'t always around--it is a private organization created a few years ago to invest our CPP money, which is taken by the government in the first place. It could be different; it doesn\'t need to exist as a private company the way it currently does. In fact, the Council of Canadians vehemently opposed the CPPIB when it was formed.
COAT is not focusing specifically on the sovereignty aspect because they are a small organization with a focus on peace. But this action has implications for sovereignty and that it exactly why it gets posted to this site.
However, it will not change until an outside force comes about to make the system go south, perhaps for a long time.
I\'m not an economist, but if the next depression is worse than the Great depression, there are many more bodies to line the sides of the road these days.
To address ethics, if my company in Canada spills oil on the ground intentionally, they go to jail.
Not so in Mexico, China, India, etc.
Anybody have shares in Union Carbide ? Remember the thousands that died in India not so many years ago ?
(I hope I have my facts right !)
---
"Arrogance in Politics is unacceptable"
Jim Callaghan
Minden, Ontario
705-286-1860
www.misterc.ca