CPP Investments Should Be Ethical!

Posted on Monday, February 09 at 15:50 by sthompson
And, as the Ottawa Citizen article states: "Mr. Martin said his motion was inspired by a recent study by the Coalition to Oppose the Arms Trade [COAT], which linked CPP investments to top U.S. military contractors."

The article did NOT mention that COAT has created a web petition to oppose CPP war investments. If you haven't yet signed, please do so, and encourage others to do likewise:
http://coat.openconcept.ca

Please respond to the Ottawa Citizen article (see below) with a letter to the editor:
letters@thecitizen.canwest.com
http://www.canada.com/ottawa/ottawacitizen/letters.html
Ottawa Citizen
1101 Baxter Road
Box 5020
Ottawa, ON
K2C 3M4

=== === === === === === === === === === === ===
To order a copy of COAT's 50-page report:
"Operation Embedded Complicity: Canada, Playing our Part in the Business of War" just send $5 to:
COAT, 541 McLeod St., Ottawa ON K1R 5R2
(Or subscribe: 1 year=$20, 2 years=$36)

=== === === === === === === === === === === ===

Here's the Ottawa Citizen article:

Invest pension fund ethically: NDP motion
CPP's billions should support Canadian values, says Pat Martin

By Bill Curry
The Ottawa Citizen, Sunday, February 08, 2004

The Canada Pension Plan reserve fund, which is predicted to swell beyond $160 billion within a decade, should be forced into ethical investments rather than supporting companies such as military suppliers and tobacco makers, states a new motion tabled in the Commons by the NDP.

In light of recent reforms to the program to ensure it can support the retiring baby boom generation, increased premiums have boosted the fund to its current $64.7-billion. NDP MP Pat Martin said the ballooning fund means its investments now have a significant impact on the economy and Canadians should have a debate over whether the Canada Pension Plan Investment Review Board needs guidelines regarding how it invests their money.

"There are lots of Canadians who refuse to invest in tobacco companies for all kinds of ethical reasons who will be really upset to learn there's nothing stopping the CPP from doing that," said Mr. Martin.

CPP funds have gradually been transferred to the board since it was created in 1999 with a mandate to invest in private equities.

The NDP MP points out that many Canadians pride themselves for not supporting the U.S.-led war in Iraq, yet the fund has about $600-million invested in U.S. military contractors, such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon and General Dynamics.

"It's absolutely shocking. I mean, part of the Chretien legacy was staying out of the war in Iraq. Well, we've been inadvertently participating in the war in Iraq all along through our Canada Pension Plan. It's disingenuous to Canadians."

The motion introduced by Mr. Martin last week calls for the Canada Pension Plan Investment Review Board to be "prohibited from investing in companies and enterprises that manufacture and trade in military arms and weapons, have records of poor environmental and labour practices or whose conduct and practices are contrary to Canadian values."

With the current session of Parliament expected to be cut short for an election, the motion is not expected to come to a vote in the near future, but NDP leader Jack Layton has said the idea will be part of his party's campaign platform.

Mr. Martin argues that if the CPP is going to be investing in the stock market, it should use "ethical funds" which have various screens to weed out companies such as military contractors, tobacco and alcohol producers and companies engaged in child labour.

"The ethical mutual funds have in some cases outperformed the general funds, but what we need to take into account with our pension plan is that we could be achieving necessary secondary objectives that may be more difficult to measure," he said.Mr. Martin's other investment suggestions include using the fund to build social housing and then collecting returns through mortgages, lending money to municipalities for green infrastructure like public transit and generating profit from the interest, or funding energy retrofits for government buildings and collecting the energy savings.

Mr. Martin said his motion was inspired by a recent study by the Coalition to Oppose the Arms Trade, which linked CPP investments to top U.S. military contractors.

Fred Ketchen, director of equity trading for Scotia McLeod, questioned Mr. Martin's proposal, pointing out that "ethical" mutual funds have traditionally underperformed traditional funds. Also, Mr. Ketchen said maximizing returns for Canada's seniors could be considered a social goal in itself.

"I know that it's tough for those people who may think that some of their Canada Pension Plan money is being invested in God knows what -- Rothmans or Molsons or Lockheed Martin or Boeing -- but I thought the Canada Pension Plan was supposed to represent all Canadians," he said.

Mr. Ketchen said ethical funds will likely always underperform traditional funds because they go against the main rule of investing, which is to have as diverse a portfolio as possible.

"I admire people who have that philosophy but if I was running a pension plan, I'd be looking for the best results that I could get from all sectors with diversification," he said. Mr. Ketchen added that Canadians should not be surprised that the CPP has lost money since entering the stock market, because it has been a down period for all investors.

CPP Investment Board spokesman John Cappelletti said federal legislation requires the board to focus only on maximizing returns and that changing the legislation would not be easy.

"It would take more than Parliament," he said, pointing out that the federal government would also have to secure the support of two-thirds of the nine participating provinces representing two-thirds of the population.

The Ottawa Citizen, Sunday Feb. 8, 2004, p. 3
Reprinted here for fair use only

=== === === === === === === === === === === ===
In related news:

Physicians for a Smoke-free Canada has just launched a web petition focusing on CPP investments in tobacco industries: http://www.smoke-free.ca/lifesavings/cpp

Sign their petition:
http://www.smoke-free.ca/lifesavings/cpp/petition.html

Note: http://coat.openconcept.ca letters@thecitizen.canw... http://www.canada.com/o... http://www.smoke-free.c...

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Tue Feb 10, 2004 12:12 am
    I wonder what they mean by 'ethically'? My ethics? Your ethics? No one can assume they are the same all the time.<p> This'll be a really big fur ball before long. Getting CPP as high as possible as fast as possible, because many of the boomer generation are getting to the point where it's going to be shelling out some serious cash. I'd like a little left when it's time for me to retire in 40 years.<p> To do that, it needs to be invested in high risk - good performing stocks. Those aren't always ethical. Personally, I wouldn't care if they invested in Molsons, or Labatt. I invest in them myself, 1 case at a time. But someone else may not condone those investments.<p> What about investing in Canadian content? There are rules about private investors and forgien content, what about the Gubmint? Shouldn't the Canadian Government invest our tax money - and potential retirement plans - in Canadian companies?<p> Perhaps that would get them to start favouring Canadian companies in their trade negotiations. Heh!<p> <p>---<br>"History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme" Mark Twain <br />"The greatest price of not participating in politics is being governed by your inferiors." Plato

  2. Tue Feb 10, 2004 12:49 am
    I was the person who originally came up with the action and ran the research project for COAT, including doing a lot of the research and writing the original draft of the research report, so I feel very strongly about this.

    Dr Caleb--there\'s something called the \"Sudan discount\"--meaning companies that engage in shady practices or work in unstable countries (eg like Talisman did in the Sudan) can see a very real and very negative effect on their earnings. 60 minutes did a documentary on this related to the US just recently. Ethical investments do in fact make good business sense, and many giant companies are able to follow ethical guidelines with no problems. There are any number of companies that advise corporations on how to invest ethically and some representatives of these companies have stated that it would not be difficult for the CPPIB to do the same. \"Don\'t invest in products that kill people\" is a good and uncontroversial start.

    And you have to realize that the CPPIB isn\'t just investing in a few bad companies--they are investing in almost every one of the top ten US weapons contractors, including Lockheed Martin, not to mention the \"ex-President\'s club\", the Carlyle Group, which has deep ties to George W. A number of the companies have contributed significantly to Canadian political campaigns as well, which is also explained by COAT. And there is no way for Canadians to conscientiously object to giving their money to these companies, since they are taken off our paycheques automatically, meaning our dollars are going directly and without our choice to corporations and American corprations specifically who are buying political influence, eroding sovereignty, and profiting from war. In many cases these companies are acting in direct contravention of Canadian policy, such as the decision to stay out of the war on Iraq or not to build landmines, which we signed a treaty against doing in any way.

    It\'s called the military-industrial complex. If we are putting our CPP money directly and without choice into the hands of companies who have a vested interest in militarism and certain policies, where is our democracy then? Where is our sovereignty?

    The CPPIB, after all, wasn\'t always around--it is a private organization created a few years ago to invest our CPP money, which is taken by the government in the first place. It could be different; it doesn\'t need to exist as a private company the way it currently does. In fact, the Council of Canadians vehemently opposed the CPPIB when it was formed.

    COAT is not focusing specifically on the sovereignty aspect because they are a small organization with a focus on peace. But this action has implications for sovereignty and that it exactly why it gets posted to this site.

  3. Tue Feb 10, 2004 2:54 am
    Thanks for the insight and explanation Susan, well said. I agree that as we have no say in the fact that we pay into it, the least we could do is have it invested in companies that\'s main goal is not to annihilate other people, through military co. such as Lockheed Martin and others, or supporting political campaigns. I think part of the problem is when they say \'ethical\' and then lump these killing machines with controversial personal choices, ie. beer companies and cigarettes makers; their is a difference some may not see it but I don\'t think a person chooses to step on a land mine, but they do choose to smoke or drink.

  4. Tue Feb 10, 2004 4:44 pm
    Good explanation, thanks.<p> But like our Anonymous friend suggests above, promising to invest in "products that don't kill people" is tough! I'd guess, (and without doing any research) that General Motors and Toyota killed more people last year than General Dynamics and Boeing*. Meat packers probabally killed more people than drug companies. More people probabally dies in the oil industry than the nuclear energy industry.<p> That's why I'd suggest investing in Canadian companies. CPPIB can't avoid investing in companies where death is caused my equipment malfunctions or personal choices (workplace safety, dangerous work habits, unsafe materials) but you can make a choice to avoid the landmine and weapon manufacturers in favour of things like Ballard Power or Windfarm energy. Investing in Canada will create more jobs, but in the short term reduce the growth of the CPP.<p> Just my $.02.<p> * depends on how you define "killed". If Auto Manufacturers made it so cars wouldn't start if the drivers seatbelt wasn't done up, many lives would be saved.<p><p>---<br>"History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme" Mark Twain <br />"The greatest price of not participating in politics is being governed by your inferiors." Plato

  5. Wed Feb 11, 2004 12:37 am
    how about starting with ethical money to begin with. Is the current system of \'debt money\' ethical? No, it is not. The coming debt depression will destroy wealth in an unbelievable serious of economic cataclysms. All the debt must be paid back, it\'s just the question of who will get stuck with the invoice. You can be sure it will be the people who support the great unwashed social-welfare statist do-gooder big goverment system. The smart people are already gone, the have addresses in the caribbean, or have a dual passport. Thanks multi-cult lovers, you\'re a wonderful group to work with.

  6. Wed Feb 11, 2004 9:08 pm
    You are right, the current monetary system is unsustainable.

    However, it will not change until an outside force comes about to make the system go south, perhaps for a long time.

    I\'m not an economist, but if the next depression is worse than the Great depression, there are many more bodies to line the sides of the road these days.


    To address ethics, if my company in Canada spills oil on the ground intentionally, they go to jail.

    Not so in Mexico, China, India, etc.

    Anybody have shares in Union Carbide ? Remember the thousands that died in India not so many years ago ?

    (I hope I have my facts right !)




    ---
    "Arrogance in Politics is unacceptable"
    Jim Callaghan
    Minden, Ontario
    705-286-1860
    www.misterc.ca

  7. Thu Feb 12, 2004 4:15 am
    Gold and silver are excellent investments. How so? simple. They are not allowed to be held in an RRSP. The government is scared absolutely shietless of precious metals as a store of wealth, it stands in direct competition to the money they print up at the flick of a pen. What does that tell me? Well, if government is inherently unethical (as I believe), then gold and silver is the no brainer for CPP investment, right? well no. The CPP can only be a reservoir for debt money, the socializing of debt, if you will. Hard assets, the tangible, fungible kind, are only for the smart folk. You might ask: doesn\'t the BOC have gold reserves? Actually, No, they do not. The gold was leased out during the 1990\'s, and is now gone for good. They moved virtually the last few tonnes off their books late last year (if I remember right, they still have 300,000 oz). You see, there was a huge carry trade in gold during the 1990\'s, a scam the financial elites played to jack up the US dollar, and contributing to the Internet stock market bubble of 2000. They \'borrowed\' gold from as many Central Bank as they could. Three central banks pointedly told them to phuck off, France, Italy, and Lebanon. Now the carry trade banks are terribly \'short\' gold, to the tune of 15,000 tonnes. This \'problem\' has exacerbated the drive to derivatives, as well as the need to jack up housing prices to unaffordable levels. Y\'see, the banks needed to create \'free\' money, and force people into more debt, lest people moved into gold, and actually started \'saving\' WHOOAA what a concept. Raising house prices and lowering interest rates was the easiest way to do it. The USA went into controlled panic mode, they even started wars in Iraq and A-stan to secure oil before the world went to Euro\'s-for-oil. And to do that, they had to ALLOW a Pearl Harbor type of attack, in the form of the WTC destruction. Then shut the country down with phoney anti-terrorism laws. It\'s plenty messy out there folks, Machiavelli would be proud. Yes, youngens, boomers gonna make you cry, dontcha just love everyone over 40?

  8. Thu Feb 12, 2004 10:05 am
    \'everyone over 40\'? that\'s quite a statement! There are crooks, corporate and otherwise in every age bracket...this new world order has been in the works for well over 40 yrs, corruption is older than the Bible, greed is a part of society that is not new, knowing it exists is only one small part of the problem! What we do about it is the real question, so besides blaming an age group what is your suggestion?

  9. Thu Feb 12, 2004 6:04 pm
    sorry, that last line should be changed from \'dontcha just love everyone over 40\' to \'dontcha just love ameroisreali fascists\'



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news