The top income category is earning on average $20,000 more than they did in 1989 after accounting for inflation. Most other Canadians have lost income. In fact, Canadian households earning below $60,400 have seen a decrease in their average earnings, before tax and federal transfers to families.
Overall households representing 60% of incomes experienced a decrease in their income share in 2005 as compared to 1989. Statistics reveal that income share after transfers for the richest 20% of Canadians has been continuously increasing to the point where they take nearly 50% of all income.
“Canadian families are worse off today than they were before Free Trade agreements were implemented in 1989,” said Julian. “Today, more and more Canadians have to work harder without being able to keep up. We have seen 250,000 good manufacturing jobs lost and increasing hardships in our softwood lumber community.”
Julian said Canadians need a government that has the vision and courage to implement an agenda for shared and sustainable prosperity, which would include a higher minimum wage, affordable housing, a national pharmacare drug plan, a publicly-funded child care system and accessible post secondary education.
Statistics Canada reports a 48% overall increase in the number of Canadians working overtime since 1991. The amount of overtime hours being worked by Canadians has increased by 22% since 1991. This comes at a time when Canadian households also increasingly have to cope with steep debt: the household debt to disposable income ratio reached 126.77% in 2006, an increase of 37% over the same period.
“Canadians are working longer and harder and are barely able to catch up to their debts and mortgages,” said Julian. “Only the NDP is standing up for today’s families.”
************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Le revenu de la classe moyenne est plus faible depuis l’accord de libre-échange, souligne le NPD
OTTAWA À la veille du 20e anniversaire de la négociation de l’accord de libre-échange entre le Canada et les États-Unis, le critique du NPD en matière de commerce international, Peter Julian (Burnaby-New Westminster), a présenté son analyse des nouveaux chiffres de Statistique Canada qui démontrent une augmentation dramatique de l’inégalité du revenu de la plupart des familles canadiennes depuis 1989. Les statistiques démontrent que les salariés les mieux payés gagnent de plus en plus, alors que la plupart des Canadiens voient leur revenu réel diminuer.
« Les familles canadiennes ont vu une érosion régulière de leur revenu. Voilà une autre preuve que les politiques économiques malavisées des conservateurs ne font qu’aggraver le déséquilibre social que les anciens gouvernements libéraux ont créé, a dit le député Julian. Même si l’on tient compte des impôts et des transferts gouvernementaux, la plupart des familles canadiennes sont plus pauvres qu’en 1989. »
Les gens qui font partie de la tranche de revenu la plus élevée gagnent en moyenne 20 000 $ de plus qu’en 1989, après avoir tenu compte de l’inflation. La plupart des autres Canadiens ont perdu du revenu. En fait, les ménages canadiens qui gagnent moins de 60 400 $ ont vu leur revenu moyen diminuer, avant les impôts et les transferts fédéraux destinés aux familles.
Les ménages qui représentent 60 % des revenus ont vu leur part du revenu total diminuer en 2005 par rapport à 1989. Les statistiques révèlent que la part du revenu total, après les transferts, du 20 % des Canadiens les mieux nantis ne cesse d’augmenter, de sorte que ce groupe représente presque 50 % de tous les revenus.
« Les familles canadiennes ont plus de mal à joindre les deux bouts aujourd’hui qu’avant la mise en vigueur des ententes de libre-échange en 1989, a lancé le député Julian. Aujourd’hui, de plus en plus de Canadiens doivent travailler plus fort sans pour autant être capables de garder la tête hors de l’eau. Nous avons vu 250 000 bons emplois dans le secteur manufacturier disparaître et la crise dans le secteur du bois d’œuvre s’empire. »
Le député Julian a souligné que les Canadiens ont besoin d’un gouvernement qui a la vision et le courage nécessaires pour mettre en œuvre un programme qui favorise une prospérité durable. Cela comprendrait un salaire minimum plus élevé, plus de logements abordables, un régime d’assurance-médicaments national, des services de garderie publics et l’éducation postsecondaire plus accessible.
Selon Statistique Canada, le nombre de Canadiens faisant des heures supplémentaires a augmenté de 48 % depuis 1991. Le nombre d’heures supplémentaires que font les Canadiens a augmenté de 22 % depuis 1991. En même temps, les ménages canadiens font face à plus de dettes accablantes : la proportion de la dette des familles par rapport à leur revenu disponible a atteint 126,77 % en 2006, soit une augmentation de 37 % pendant cette même période.
« Les Canadiens travaillent plus fort et plus longtemps mais ils peinent à rembourser leurs dettes et leurs hypothèques, a déploré le député Julian. Seul le NPD est capable de défendre les intérêts des familles d’aujourd’hui. »
http://www.ndp.ca/page/5755
Note: http://www.ndp.ca/page/...

Second, our electoral system means that the only parties that have a shot at winning a riding are one of two parties. Both of which presided over this occurence.
Third, people themselves play no part in making tax policy. For example, what this article doesn't say is that trade policy and societal inequality is not necessarily related. Martin was the forerunner in making tax breaks for the wealthiest canadians through various means, and enabling them to hide money.
A country CAN increase trade as well as maintain equality, most european nations do it all the time, the scandinavian ones do it quite well.
Its FAR from the case that canadians are 'choosing their own executioners', like in the states, we are simply redundant to most of the political system.
I wish all the luck to our Chinese friends, as long as they produce goods for themselves, as all regions of the world should.
Monetary values are not realities, but often forcibly induced temporary perceptions, therefore their use in economic calculations is fraudulent.
The only way the cost of a product can be calculated is by measuring the inputs of resources and energy into its production. The lowest inputs are, and will always be, the lowest real costs, which cancels out any benefits of long distance manufactured imports.
Except to the middlemen, who get disgustingly rich an powerful by separating the producers from the users and distort real values with imaginary, monetary perceptions.
Look up on google David Ricardo's "Iron Law of Wages" and compare what he advocated almost 200 years ago, with what is going on today in the name of market economics.
Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC.
<br />
There can be no economic sovereignty so long as there exists the Bank of International Settlements The bogusly name “Federal Reserve “ which in neither federal nor a reserve.<br />
<br />
- The "Independent" Scam-<br />
"If government becomes 'independent of politics' it can only mean that that sphere of government becomes an absolute self-perpetuating oligarchy."<br />
<br />
Murray Rothbard, The Case Against The Fed<br />
<br />
Oligarchy and neo-fascism are what we, the people, are fighting today. A top-down, undemocratic, globalization process is effectively removing all local controls and cultural freedoms... and in the process installing private central banks everywhere. Corporate power and rule by the few (via control of our central bank, media, trade policy, and a corrupted Congress) has now reduced much of mankind to neo-slavery upon a global plantation - all within a "free market" from which, for most, their is neither escape nor dissent.<br />
The primary instrument of this modern neo-slavery and rule by the few is interest-bearing debt, and control of our money creation process by a ruling elite. As a result of this regime, Nations, states, and families around the world are virtual prisoners of a monopoly private central bank system, and its debt money instruments and policies.<br />
These concepts of sovereignty which get bandied about are nothing more than balm for Bozos. There is a gangster class that supersedes all others and that class are the owners of the world and all that is in it.<br />
Consider , if you can, or will, mortgage (n.) <br />
1390, from O.Fr. morgage (13c.), mort gaige, lit. "dead pledge" (replaced in modern Fr. by hypothèque), from mort "dead" + gage "pledge;" so called because the deal dies either when the debt is paid or when payment fails. O.Fr. mort is from V.L. *mortus "dead," from L. mortuus, pp. of mori "to die" (see mortal). The verb is first attested 1467. <br />
<br />
<br />
Goggling Separation of Bank and State will yield this, and more <br />
<a href="http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=682&chapter=81800&layout=html&Itemid=27">http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=682&chapter=81800&layout=html&Itemid=27</a> <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
"The power of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less that to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conference."<br />
<br />
Carroll Quigley, 1966<br />
<br />
<br />
It is the mega-merchant banks and their "bond market" cartel which owns our central banks and gains private powers to rule mere governments via control of money and credit. As both history and contemporary affairs reveal, the greatest threat to the peace and stability of the world is a banking system, and central banks, removed from the people's ownership, control, and vigilant oversight. Inflation and currency ruin are the ultimate prices paid and, today, these twin taxes are gathering steam.<br />
A long history of predation, panics, planned booms and busts - all precipitated by bankers gorging on the people's money and credit powers - is exactly why the founders vested "purse" powers in the people and their elected representatives. Indeed, they were well aware of what had transpired on the European continent and how American colonies had been at the mercy of an "independent" Bank of England.<br />
<br />
Sovereignty? Like I said, Balm for Bozos<br />
<br />
<p>---<br>"When I tell the truth, it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those that do."<br />
<br />
William Blake<br />
<br />