"The recent horrific attacks in London bring into sharp focus the continuing need to intensify the fight against terrorism while stoutly defending our democratic values," External Relations Commissioner Benita Ferrero-Waldner said in a statement.
But the agreement has angered EU lawmakers, who have taken legal action against a similar deal between the EU and United States, which they say violates privacy rights.
The assembly says it would be best to wait for the ruling from European Court of Justice before going ahead with any more deals to exchange sensitive passenger data with non-EU states.
The executive Commission negotiated the deal with Canada and while lawmakers acknowledged it was better than the deal with Washington, they still refused to approve it because they were only allowed a symbolic say on it.
Brussels and Washington agreed in May 2004 to let U.S. authorities access airlines' booking records, scan up to 34 pieces of data for each passenger and keep them for 3-1/2 years.
The information can include credit card numbers, addresses, phone numbers, travel companions and itinerary.
Fewer personal details are asked for under the EU-Canada agreement, which the Commission said respected European rules on data protection.
http://www.metronews.ca/reuters_national.asp?id=84369
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on July 19, 2005]
Note: http://www.metronews.ca...

---
Dave Ruston
---
Vera Gottlieb
Do we canadians really want to intergrate with this Nazi american country, and will canada adopt the same attitute, we as canadians still have time to say no, before our own politicians sell us out, and if and when that happens, one would be justified to accuse our politicians as traitors to Canada.
<br />
<a href="http://northamericans4peace.blogspot.com/2005/07/this-is-special-difference-between.html">http://northamericans4peace.blogspot.com/2005/07/this-is-special-difference-between.html</a>
I'll put $10 on the mongoose.
To do otherwise risks a kind of "Canadian exceptionalism" to go along with "American exceptionalism": that our highly-leveraged approach to international relations is to be spent on all nations save the "exceptional" US. For decades we have had a foreign policy in which we were willing to engage the worst governments on the planet, with only the limited toolset of a middle power, in order to attempt to effect positive change. Is the current American administration worse than Mao's China, Suharto's Indoensia, or Bhreznev's Soviet Union, all of whom deserved diplomatic engagement? Please don't risk further hyperbole by attempting an answer.
Those calling for Canada to disengage from the US, besides being geographically ignorant, betray Canada's legacy in international relations. We are one of few nations who have any diplomatic leverage left.
<br />
forgive my not linking this story only, it might not be around <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.examiner.ie/pport/web/ireland/Full_Story/did-sg46g7Ks0cvBEsg7OWirIStPSk.asp">http://www.examiner.ie/pport/web/ireland/Full_Story/did-sg46g7Ks0cvBEsg7OWirIStPSk.asp</a><br />
<br />
21/07/05 <br />
Treaty gives CIA powers over Irish citizens <br />
<br />
By Dan Buckley<br />
US INVESTIGATORS, including CIA agents, will be allowed interrogate Irish citizens on Irish soil in total secrecy, under an agreement signed between Ireland and the US last week. <br />
<br />
Suspects will also have to give testimony and allow property to be searched and seized even if what the suspect is accused of is not a crime in Ireland. <br />
<br />
Under 'instruments of agreement' signed last week by Justice Minister Michael McDowell, Ireland and the US pledged mutual co-operation in the investigation of criminal activity. It is primarily designed to assist America's so-called 'war on terror' in the wake of the September 11 atrocities. <br />
<br />
The deal was condemned yesterday by the Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) as "an appalling signal of how the rights of Irish citizens are considered by the minister when engaging in international relations". The ICCL said it appeared to go far beyond even what has been agreed between EU countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
On signing the agreement, the minister said that "the international community must do everything it can to combat terrorism with every means at its disposal.<br />
<br />
"Ireland will not be found wanting," he added. <br />
<br />
The treaty will give effect to agreements on Mutual Legal Assistance and Extradition signed by the EU and the US in June 2003. These are aimed at building on mutual assistance and extradition arrangements. <br />
<br />
Although the Department of Justice insists that the arrangement merely updates existing agreements, it goes much further. The US may ask Irish authorities: <br />
<br />
To track down people in Ireland. <br />
<br />
Transfer prisoners in Irish custody to the US. <br />
<br />
Carry out searches and seize evidence on behalf of the US Government. <br />
<br />
It also allows US authorities access to an Irish suspect's confidential bank information. The Irish authorities must keep all these activities secret if asked to do so by the US. <br />
<br />
The person who will request co-operation is US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, the man who, as White House counsel, instigated the notorious 'torture memo' to US President George W Bush which advised how far CIA agents could go in torturing prisoners. The person to whom the request is sent is the Minister for Justice. <br />
<br />
About 20,000 immigrants, who have not been charged with any crime, are currently in prison in the US. In two recent US Supreme Court cases, the US Government argued that US citizens could be imprisoned indefinitely without charge if the president designated them as "enemy combatants". <br />
<br />
ICCL director Aisling Reidy said: "An extraordinary aspect to this treaty is, despite its scope and its potential to violate basic constitutional and human rights, that all this happened without debate or transparency. <br />
<br />
"To agree to give such powers to a government which has allowed detention of its own citizens without access to a lawyer for over a year, which has legitimised Guantanamo Bay and the interrogation techniques there, without public debate, is an appalling signal of how highly or not the rights of Irish citizens are considered by the minister when engaging in international relations."<br />
<br />
The Department of Justice said it was wrong to say the treaty happened without debate, as the agreements update and supplement existing arrangements, and the EU-US agreement has been scrutinised by the Oireachtas four times since December 2002. <br />
<br />
A spokesperson also rejected that the measures go beyond what was agreed between EU countries. <br />
<br />
Legislation will be required to give effect to some elements of the Mutual Legal Assistance Instrument. The necessary provisions will be contained in the Criminal Justice (Mutual Assistance) Bill which Mr McDowell expects to publish shortly. <br />