US Trying To Steal Canadian Oil Up North

Posted on Monday, July 05 at 11:02 by N Say
YELLOWKNIFE - Canada is trying a new tactic in the 30-year-old dispute with the United States over the boundary under the Beaufort Sea.

By mapping the seabed using radar, the government will take a step towards establishing sovereignty under international law.

The 2004 budget allocated $51 million over 10 years to map the Arctic continental shelf.

"The data collected will lead to a formal submission under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and help secure Canada's sovereignty in the High Arctic," the budget said.

Canada claims the border under the Beaufort Sea runs straight from the Alaska-Northwest Territories border. The U.S. says it angles east from the shoreline.

At stake is a huge volume of sub-sea oil and gas.

The U.S. recently offered four development licences to American companies in the disputed area.

The Department of Foreign Affairs responded with a diplomatic note saying Canada rejects the U.S. effort to claim jurisdiction, a spokesperson said.

Written by CBC News Online staff

from CBC

The Americans say the Alaska-Yukon border goes towards Ellesmere Island, and not straight towards the North Pole like it has done for the last 70 years. See a map here. James Laxer has written that the biggest challenge for us in the 21st century will be sovreignty up north. I think he may be right.

Note: from CBC here

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Mon Jul 05, 2004 6:29 pm
    Icebreakers, patrol aircraft, survey teams, scientific exploration are just a few of the most obvious things that Canada should be doing in the North, we used to, but the money has since been re-allocated because sovereignty doesn't appear to mean that much to Canadians these days. Canadians are fast losing title to the Arctic lands and waters. An increase in Defence spending with a renewed mandate to establish Canadian sovereignty should be a priority of government, Canada may only be an idea or notion to this government, but they still have a responsibility to future Canadians to protect the physical assets.

  2. by avatar Milton
    Mon Jul 05, 2004 8:31 pm
    The feds gave 100 billion in tax cuts, thats why there was no money to patrol the borders. We all know how much respect the US has for UN conventions and International laws.

  3. Mon Jul 05, 2004 9:16 pm
    To hell with the US, and i say we pressure our government heavily into defending our sovereignty!Just like the Northwest passage, it`s quite obvious it belongs to Canada!!!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  4. Mon Jul 05, 2004 9:23 pm
    Actually, it's not obvious at all, legally speaking. Ottawa better damn well start to assert sovereignty up north or the day will come when international law will say definitively Canada can't legtimately claim sovereignty to all of the north due to neglect.

  5. Mon Jul 05, 2004 9:53 pm
    Yes we do. The US pays the vast majority of cost for enforcement of UN conventions and International laws.

  6. Mon Jul 05, 2004 11:26 pm
    Obviously, the only REAL way to assert sovereignty in Canada's North is to have a continuing and dynamic presence. But we are huddled in a thin strip along the 49th for the most part in a "catch 22" effect. How many of us can go north on any practical basis, when we can fly to (just about) anywhere else in the world cheaper than we can to points within Canada? (Thanks, Mr. Milton!) And even if we did, what facilities exist to accommodate more than just a few hundreds of visitors? Or job seekers on any kind of industrial scale? And our military does not have the equipment to operate in Arctic conditions (of course, the Liberals would like to keep our military close at hand, in the event of another "apprehended insurrection").

    In addition, in any dispute with the US, we will undoubtedly win in any court, but what has that done for us in our NAFTA follies?

    We may as well draw the Canadian map as they did the world in the Middle Ages, with that big blank spot they call the Arctic labelled "Here there be Dragons" for what Canadians know of this part of their own nation.

  7. Mon Jul 05, 2004 11:29 pm
    Not "anonymoous" -- RickW (but doesn't want to show it)

  8. by N Say
    Tue Jul 06, 2004 2:18 am
    One way to fix this would be to stop fawning over the US. If we do that, people wouldn't need to cross the border (& live close to it) so much. I think the US basically pays people to live in Alaska (I need to check that), if that's what it would take to populate the "north" maybe that's what we should do. Dief started the Dempster Hwy which is still the only one on the continent that crosses the arctic circle. Why did it stop there? Why not start that up again, including rail, etc to develop the resources up there? No reason not to.

    ---
    "These Yankee politicians are the lowest race of thieves in existence." - Sir John Sparrow Thompson

  9. Tue Jul 06, 2004 4:23 am
    Yes, I agree why not?

    But, hey, let's admit it it: that requires too much advanced thinking of our buracrates on Parliament Hill.
    Face it: we're dommed, doomed, doomed unless a very nationalist government takes hold in Ottawa. But, gradually, as I see my friends being bought out by more pro-American ways of thinking, I cannot see how we will be able to BEGIN to assert our sovereignty (because we cannot use Dief's Dempster Highway as our standard of achievement in the North) when our federal politicians are continuously being bought out by sell-out wanna be American politicians such as Stephen Harper and his ilk, a.k.a. the Republican Party of Canada.
    While it could be contrived that Harper supports increased defense spending, we all know that this money would go towards increased border security (really, more free-flow of trade) with the U.S. and supporting the U.S. "War or Terrorism" and not towards asserting Canada's claim in the North (with a capital N because I am a proud Northerner).
    While I am very doubtful that Martin's Liberals will return to the grand experience of true democracy in Canada, (his attitude reminds me a lot of Joe's Clark in his minority goverment) as it occurred during the Trudeau-N.D.P. minority era of '72-74, I advise readers to read Mel Hurtig's "The Vanishing Country" to put all of this into context.

    - Although I am from family of immigrants, I support former Manotoba premier's Ed Schreyer's notion of "championing the underdogs." This stick-to-it ness is what one lacks in today's Canadian society.

  10. Wed Jul 07, 2004 3:14 am
    Is it just an unfortunate coincidental graphic necessity that Vive's little iconic map of Canada stops at about 70°N?

  11. Wed Jul 07, 2004 3:58 am
    No, look at a map. Its been the same for ages! What`s ours is ours! The US must respect that! It`s simple. Here we go again with 'might makes right.' That`s just like Hitler looking for Lebensraum in the east and saying 'I`m just going to go and take it!' Just because a country has a bigger military than another does not give them the right to take from others!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  12. Wed Jul 07, 2004 10:42 pm
    *blink* I was just wondering if a site I judge to be
    adamant we have everything to the Pole and should keep it
    (to which I'm agreeable) should have a Canada-map icon
    that's missing that part...



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news