EU Stalls On US Visas

Posted on Saturday, July 22 at 09:15 by jensonj
He said the report would be issued in the second week of September. The Commission said in January it wanted progress before it reported in July and warned it had the power to recommend sanctions. The United States, which tightened immigration measures after the September 2001 attacks on U.S. cities, cites security concerns and worries about overstays for maintaining the requirement, which it would require legislation to change. "We have very close relations with the United States and we cannot understand why we are subject to such discrimination," a Czech diplomat said, noting Czechs could travel freely anywhere in the world except for the United States and Canada. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/21/AR2006072100178.html

Note: http://www.washingtonpo...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sun Jul 23, 2006 8:42 pm
    It seems odd that after all this time, the EU thinks the USA cares. The US would merely impose sanctions against any country they can't just walk into. At most, they would declare the particular country is harbouring terrorists. The UN would endorse such action, now that the organization is in complete control by the US.

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  2. Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:18 am
    <p>My understanding is that each of the 15 of 25 EU nations that have visa waivers with the USA was arranged individually; that is, the pre-2004 EU as a whole was not the entity that has signed on for visa waivers. (This is demonstrable by Slovenia being “in” and Greece being “out”, despite Greece being a pre-2004 EU state and Slovenia being a post-2003 EU state.) Our <i>Immigration and Nationality Act</i> states the conditions for a nation to be eligible for visa waivers; some of those conditions are objective, and some of them are subjective. I don’t know which subjective conditions are driving the continued exclusion of the 10 of 25.</p><p>---<br>Shatter your ideals upon the rock of Truth.<br />
    <br />
    — The Divine Symphony, by Inayat Khan<br />

  3. Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:11 pm
    Lets not forget that according to the U.S. conditions for visa-free relations for a test two-year period, a country must be in the EU, support the USA in the war in Iraq and Afghanistan by deploying a unit of at least 300 members and be no security risk for the USA.


    ---
    Perception is two thirds of what we perceive reality to be.

    Difficult decisions are a privilege of rank.

  4. Tue Jul 25, 2006 10:07 pm
    <p>jensonj,</p> <p>I’m not sure whether your tongue is in your cheek or not. Among the participating countries in the visa waiver program are Brunei, New Zealand, Singapore, and Switzerland; each of these countries is neither in the EU nor has units deployed in either Iraq or Afghanistan. Our State Department lists its conditions for participating in the program <a href="http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/without_1255.html">here</a>.</p><p>---<br>Shatter your ideals upon the rock of Truth.<br />
    <br />
    — The Divine Symphony, by Inayat Khan<br />

  5. Sat Jul 29, 2006 3:51 am
    "visa-free relations" Where no Visa is a required to travel at all between both Countries. Like Canada and the U.S.A.

    Not the "visa waiver program" which is a waiver program where visa's are required.

    ---
    Perception is two thirds of what we perceive reality to be.

    Difficult decisions are a privilege of rank.

  6. Sat Jul 29, 2006 6:40 am
    <p>You’re probably thinking of Senate bill 2611, the <i>Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006</i>, in particular section 413, titled <i>Visa Waiver Program Expansion</i>. (The <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/">THOMAS search page</a> at the Library of Congress site can provide the text of the bill.) That particular definition — provision of at least one battalion to Iraq or Afghanistan; EU member; not a security risk — was specifically tailored to add only Poland to the list of visa waiver nations. It was written in this way, as an amendment to the immigration bill, because bills from the previous Senate session that explicitly added Poland to the visa waiver program didn’t go anywhere.</p> <p>Note that this proposal is <i>not</i> a visa exemption, such as Canada, Mexico, and Bermuda have; this bill is providing a visa waiver.</p> <p>Note also that the House of Representatives has not yet taken up this bill, so it’s nowhere near being law yet.</p><p>---<br>Shatter your ideals upon the rock of Truth.<br />
    <br />
    — The Divine Symphony, by Inayat Khan<br />

  7. Sat Jul 29, 2006 11:30 pm
    Thanks for the info and my mis-understanding.

    ---
    Perception is two thirds of what we perceive reality to be.

    Difficult decisions are a privilege of rank.

  8. Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:37 pm
    <p>I was wrong on one point in my last post: most Mexicans still require visas to legally enter the USA. I hadn’t realised that the State Department-issued <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/types/types_1266.html">Border Crossing Cards</a> include visas, rather than act as a waiver for visas.</p><p>---<br>Shatter your ideals upon the rock of Truth.<br />
    <br />
    — The Divine Symphony, by Inayat Khan<br />



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news