Israel's Vice Prime Minister Shimon Peres said that Iran should be expelled from the United Nations for making such comments.
"Since the United Nations was established in 1945, there has never been a head of state, that is a U.N. member state, that publicly called for the elimination of another U.N. member," Peres said in a radio interview.
"There has never been such a scandal. It is impossible to ignore this and close your ears," said Peres, a one of the architects of the Oslo peace process with the Palestinians and a Nobel Peace Prize winner.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev said that at this point, the Israeli government has not made a formal request to remove Iran from the United Nations, but Israel is asking for worldwide condemnation of Ahmadinehad's comments.
Israeli ambassadors around the world have been asked to contact foreign ministers, prime ministers and presidents. "We have asked that the organized international community formally condemn the outrageous statements."
It is not acceptable for one member state of the U.N. to call for the destruction of another member state, said Regev.
But the problem is not just the extreme language of the Iranian regime, said Regev. "Yesterday there was a terror attack perpetrated by Islamic Jihad. Islamic Jihad is armed, trained and financed by the regime in Iran."
Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility for a suicide bombing in the northern Israeli city of Hadera on Wednesday, in which five people were murdered and some 30 others wounded.
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/viewstory.asp?Page=%5CForeignBureaus%5Carchive%5C200510%5CFOR20051027c.html
Note: http://www.cnsnews.com/...

Is Iran ASKING to be attacked or what? This could develop into a war where nuclear weapons are used on Iran.
---
The midget, Bush, and that Rumsfield deserve only to be beaten with shoes by freedom loving people everywhere.
- Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, The Iraqi Informat
This is just more slander to prepare the West for an invasion.
This speech sounds like "Carthago delenda est" (Carthage must be destroyed) by Marcus Cato, 2200 years ago. I think it is not important.
Most people around the worls understand what took place under the Nazi regime and are getting sick and tired of the same old bullshit.
That is correct bullshit, Israel has been doing to other what they complain about has happened to them, to tel the truth I somewhat, agree with Iran.
Yes the you are right, the American "government" are looking at ways to invade Iran and if they do, this will
and might be the very invasion that end the world. Lets face it, how much more of this Yankee shit do you think other countries are going to put up with?
Sooner or rather than later, some country is going to get really pissed off and if they think 911 created problems, they better be ready for much greater problems. The Yankees are missing with the whole planet and why are they doing this?
More and more people are opening up their eyes are viewing the Americans for what they really are. War mongers
---
Good government is not a party government
<a href="http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/">http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/</a><br />
<br />
Traditional Jews Are Not Zionists<br />
Although there are those who refuse to accept the teachings of our Rabbis and will continue to support the Zionist state, there are also many who are totally unaware of the history of Zionism and its contradiction to the beliefs of Torah-True Jews. <br />
Words of the Rabbis Opposing Zionism - Today's Quote<br />
<br />
Rabbi Amram BlauThe Jewish People are absolutely opposed to any injury against the Arab nation. The Arab nation never harmed the Jewish People until the advent of Zionist nationalism. The Jewish People are commanded by the Torah to seek the peace of the governments where they are citizens, and not to rebel against any nation, G-d forbid, especially when this concerns the Holy Land, to which we are forbidden to engage in mass immigration.<br />
<br />
Jews who follow the Torah are not even suspected of murder or any injury against any person, and we are severely prohibited from engaging in any violent action, including in relation to the struggle over Palestine. Judaism is totally opposed to nationalism, and in fact Jews have refused to move to the Zionist state even though the state proclaims itself as the representative of the Jewish People.<br />
<br />
<br />
Words of the Zionists - Today's Quote<br />
Apolinari HartglassMemorandum written in 1943 by the Zionist activist from Poland who coordinated the work of the Jewish Agency Rescue Committee during WWII, entitled "Comments on Aid and Rescue" [referring to selection of the European Jews to be saved during the height of the holocaust]: <br />
<br />
"Unfortunately we must state that if we are able to save only 10,000 people from among 50,000 who can contribute to building the country and to the national revival of the people as against saving a million jews who will be a burden, or at best an apathetic element, we must restrain ourselves and save the 10,000 that can be saved from among the 50,000---despite the accusations and pleas of the million.....going on from this assumption we must save children first because they are the best material for the Yishuv. The pioneer youth must be saved, but specifically those that have received training and are spiritually able to perform Zionist labor. Zionist leader must be saved, since they deserve something from the Zionist movement in return for their work. . . ."<br />
<br />
...Apolinari Hartglass, "Comments on Aid and Rescue," undated memorandum, Central Zionist Archives, Jerusalem <p>---<br>"The cost to the good people for their indifference to their public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." - Plato<br />
I don't make jokes. I just watch the governmen
VERY interesting thought. The sanction / war drums are certainly beating out their propaganda rhythm in the face of Syria, a much more vulnerable country than Iran. I work with maps, and having just published a map of Iran, the place is HUGE compared to Iraq, with a much larger population who are much more faithful to their government. The US is discovering that fomenting angst and hate amongst their population, towards their government, is not bearing fruit. Add to that, Iran is allegedly being armed to the teeth by China and Russia (in preparation for...?) The US military is so bogged down and spread so thin these days... the "insurgents" are perhaps scattered and slow moving - but it appears this is a tactic that is working. How could the US possibly tackle Iran? Would a new military draft, slipped through the back doors of congress, be such a shock coming from the present US administration? Yes, I believe this 'most likely' fabricated outrage from the Iranian president's comments is timed well, and a tool to attempt garnering international support for sanctions, at minimum. However, do you think sanctions would really do the trick, as Iran seems to be quite cozily offering their big oil contracts to guess who... China and Russia. Is a new axis forming? Bible scholars may call this a reforming of the 'King of the North'.
I agree with most of the posts here; the problem does not lie with the jewish community at all. As with most problem areas, the focus should be on the state and their mandate. We know that a lot of Americans are against the Bush Co. - so it's not Americans as a rule, it's the government that is screwing up.
Interesting newspaper day yesterday though... I noticed that both the main Vancouver papers had the Huge black ink headlines, blaring out the outrageous claim that the Iranian pres. had called for the destruction of Israel. Perhaps they will have to make a retraction. I've read most of the stories reported on the situation, and most seem to agree that the pres. was not making a personal statement. He was quoting Imam Khomenei. Let's not forget, he was speaking at a seminar devoted to the subject of a 'World Without Zionism' - that is, the political ideology - not the Jewish community worldwide or in Israel. It certainly has the appearance of grandstanding into a blown up and out of proportion comment, for the aim of fomenting hatred and disgust with Iran - is this a coincidence, as 1. the US the UK and Israel are trying their damndest to make them the new bad guys on the block, 2. Iran is perhaps the last big obstacle to the Caspian Sea pipeline project/s, 3. Iran has another large chunk of natural resource (texas tea), and perhaps most tellingly: 4. Iran recently announced its very grand plans to open their own stock exchange - the main stock being oil, and the only currency accepted for trading - the euro. You may recall the significance of this latter item if you are up on the petrodollar crisis. Quite a few countries have or want to change their petro currency to Euro, including Iraq in 2000, N. Korea, Russia and just maybe China. Another coincidence that the Axis of Evil members all had this currency project on their plates? It's fairly easy to see what will happen to the US dollar and economy if Iran goes ahead with this plan (now slated for 2006). Apparently, even Saudi Arabia is toying with the idea of a petro dollar switch to the Euro.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, former National Security Advisor, prominent CFR member, David Rockefeller protégé and figurehead for the Trilateral Commision lays all this out in his pre 9/11 book 'The Grand Chessboard'. Bush lied when he said 'they' hated the US because of its freedom. Read this book for the real answer to that question. Unmitigated gaul (but a must read, and fascinating..) flashes before your eyes while reading this, to realize that someone of this stature would spell out US global hegemony plans so blatantly, and eloquently I might add. I highly recommend this book as it will most likely open your eyes to the real chess game that is going on in the Middle East and Asia.
---
"The best place for the facts to be done is by somebody who's spending time investigating it." —George W. Bush, on Valerie Plame's identity leak.
There is more then one way to win a "war". Few of us endeared the "Hungry Thirties" and many experts say it will never happen again. Americans fear they may eventualy be considered insignificant in the world economy. They are the most significant, when the buying population is considered. Unfortunately the American regime don't want to be the "buyers". That would make them humble. Oil has replaced gold as the earmark for currency today. One has to ask if it will be, in the future. The "global economy" is hedging on it. Americans more so and that may be their downfall. The middle east is leading the world with a carrot on a stick.(oil)
The question is who's going to survive if/when oil is no longer considered gold. The American desperation to control the resource, may be to no avail.
<br />
When oil and natural gas are depeleted, what fuel will the world turn to?<br />
<br />
Coal.<br />
<br />
What country has the biggest reserves? <br />
<br />
USA.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.groupecharbonnages.fr/version_anglaise/coal_story/economy/coal_reserve.htm">http://www.groupecharbonnages.fr/version_anglaise/coal_story/economy/coal_reserve.htm</a><br />
<br />
---
Every time you complain about the moderators, god kills a kitten.
Water is plentiful but not everyware. There are places already where water has to be bought. It isn't that long ago that plans were made to tow icebergs to areas where the water would be extracted.