Cho - And More Things To Consider

If a gun is used for self-defense and in close range - just firing the piece is almost automatic, but to use it offensively to KILL other people, especially people that are trying to flee or to attack the shooter - this requires real experience over time with the particular variables of the weapons to be used. For instance the amount of pressure placed upon the specific trigger, before the shot will be fired is critical, along with how much of a kick or twist is involved in any particular combination of the weapon and the particular ammunition being used (different loads can react very differently) in terms of the performance of both the weapon and the shooter. The physical requirements are something that most people acquire first in other areas such as sports or play - apparently Cho did very little of this in any way, prior to his arrival at this point in his own death. What seems to have happened here is that Americans relied on what they "knew" from too much TV and or bad movies to make their judgments about the ability of Cho to pull this off - believably. There's a lot of information that the public will never see - because it will be part of the police reports but probably never will make its way into the public record, For instance how many of the bullets came from each gun. Also there appears not to have been any security video-tapes, so we'll never know if there was literally more than one shooter. Lack of video-tape also means that there can be no real-time reconstruction as to who was shot where, and most importantly when. Because if people were being killed at the same time in different classrooms then that would have to mean that there was more than one shooter. http://www.rense.com/general76/choand.htm

Note: http://www.rense.com/ge...