Vote On 9/11 Bill

Posted on Wednesday, December 08 at 10:27 by KevinGagnon

Yet this monumental legislation will be voted on by members of Congress without those members having had time to read, let alone study, the bill. It's just after 2:00 p.m. ET on Tuesday, December 7th. The U.S. House is expected to vote on the 9/11 bill sometime today or tomorrow. But at this moment, there isn't a copy of the final bill available for House members to read.

So, is there a provision in the bill to establish a national ID? No one seems to know. Or at least the people who do know aren't saying. What else is in the bill that the select few in Washington are keeping secret? Who knows? Anything could be...and that's the point.

Remember how passage of the Patriot Act was handled? Members had only two to three hours to read the final 400-page bill before they had to cast their vote. The legislation that created the Department of Homeland Security was handled in the same way.

So, here we go again. Everyone is talking about this monumental legislation as if they've read it. News reporters, commentators, political analysts, think tanks; 9/11 families; and yes, members of Congress are busy sounding off as experts trying to convince the American public that Congress should pass it. Have any of these people actually read it? Their opinions are just based upon someone else's opinions that are based upon other people's opinions and so on.

The House version of the intelligence reorganization bill is in two volumes. Volume 1 is 1,778 pages. Volume 2 is 1,586 pages. How many pages are in the final conference report and what exactly has been added or deleted at the last minute? Well, as of 2:00 p.m. ET, the final report is not available for members to read. But the vote on that enormous bill will be held within hours.

We urge a "no" vote because we believe the bill has a national ID provision in it. In addition, we urge a "no" vote, simply because members of Congress should know what the bill says in print before voting on it.

To send your message, go to
http://capwiz.com/liberty/issues/alert/?alertid=6739451&type=CO

Kent Snyder
The Liberty Committee
www.thelibertycommittee.org

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by RPW
    Thu Dec 09, 2004 5:28 am
    A congressman's salary is around $141,000 per year. For most of them, this represents a significant increase in their incomes. To put it bluntly, why should they care what ANY bill has to say before voting on it, when their salaries are in no way dependent upon the quality of their performance?

    ---
    RickW

  2. Thu Dec 09, 2004 6:19 am
    I don't think anyone's salary in our government is either tho is it?

    I don't know why the Congress wouldn't insist on a delay so they do have time to read it. It is clear that there is no one that has what it takes to bring this insanity to a stop. Our government is useless as tits on a chicken, the USAmericans that care are taking their sweet time in surrounding the not-so-White-House and arresting all the criminals inside it. There are gates all around it already. They just have to keep the prisoners inside.

    ---
    "Yeah, well, [Mr. President] we used all five fingers because that's the way our mittens are made." Antonia Zerbisias

  3. by RPW
    Thu Dec 09, 2004 4:20 pm
    "<i>I don't think anyone's salary in our government is either tho is it?</i>" <p>No, and that's the "beauty" of it all (for them). Government (and big business) have this thing about paying themselves <u>IN ANTICIPATION</u> of doing a good job, rather than rewarding themselves for actually <u>DOING</u> a good job.</p> Gives the phrase "no strings attached" a whole new meaning, it does. <p>---<br>RickW

  4. Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:12 pm
    They should bring out the cartoon they used for Clark many years ago, with his mittens firmly attached by strings. This works with the mittens comments of Zerbiasis (sp) and also would fit Mr. Martin to a "T", right? Come on, RIGHT?

  5. Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:55 pm
    Would someone explain how "trolls" has become a term of praise?

  6. Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:08 pm
    Poster's who have a 'handle' try to denigrate anonymous posters by calling them 'trolls' because they're jealous of the fact that anonymous posts are more coherent and well-thought out than their own posts. That is why it is a term of praise.

  7. Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:35 pm
    'Troll' is only a term of praise to a Troll. Trolls do not make coherent or well thought out posts, and usually present no argument whatsoever. <br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll</a> <br />
    <br />
    And this thread is dangerously offtopic. <br />
    <br />
    <p>---<br>"If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill <br />

  8. Fri Dec 10, 2004 12:40 am
    No kidding off topic. The "trolls" I guess have nothing much to say about this topic, so their gonna blabe about something else off topic. Can't come up with anything intelligent to say on this topic, cause the fact of the matter is its typical U.S politics.

    Kevin

    ---
    War does not determine who is right - only who is left.
    --Bertrand Russell



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news