Canada Must Abandon Subservience To U.S.

Posted on Thursday, September 29 at 14:40 by jensonj
Gas prices rise because we have a U.S.-led continental energy policy, not a policy made for Canadians. The dollar goes up because Canada has a trade surplus with the U.S., and the Bank of Canada Governor is trying to keep the lid on our exports, so he uses coded language about interest rate hikes, signalling markets to bid up the loonie, shutting down manufacturing. Softwood and beef are border issues, obviously, but so is child care. Since free trade we have given up the publicly funded, publicly administered, universally provided model for public services. Rita, and Katrina wash the Gulf coast with devastation, but no link is made to the U.S. refusal to act on climate change. Canada-U.S. relations affect two other perennial Canadian subjects: Quebec/Canada, and federal-provincial relations in general. Get the U.S. piece wrong, and the other two will hit Ottawa between the eyes. At a conference last weekend organized by Alberta's Parkland Institute on Challenges to U.S. Empire participants looked at what attitudes were emerging in Canada and elsewhere in the world to U.S. domination. China is reaching out to Latin America, organizing trade and economic missions in the U.S. backyard, the area claimed historically under the Monroe Doctrine as a U.S. zone of influence. While the U.S. and Canada are talking to China about investment and markets, China is talking to the world. With the emergence of the euro as a strong currency, the European Union has positioned itself as a legitimate world financial power. While Europeans debate the need to lower interest rates to reduce unemployment, the European central bank tries to remain aloof, all the while quietly undermining social Europe. In world trade talks, Brazil, India, South Africa and China have shown their ability to work together in opposition to U.S. initiatives. In response to these changes in world politics, Canadian foreign policy has fallen deeper into the trap set by continental economic integration. As countries re-align, Canada sits passively in the NAFTA protectionist fortress, emerging only to champion ill-conceived, dangerous and downright criminal American trade initiatives on public services, investment and intellectual property. When Canada speaks out on UN reform, the words are weak because we have failed to organize the sort of coalition that is needed to make things happen. Real UN reform threatens the U.S. and the Martin government is unwilling to do what is necessary. Canada has much work to do rethinking relations with China and the European Union. Thinking about climate change, UN reform, and a world trade agenda, has to begin anew. What Parliament needs to do is allow debate over Canada-U.S. relations to take place openly. So long as we are stuck in the U.S. camp, the other issues are not going to be addressed seriously. For the NDP, establishing itself on the Canada-U.S. question is akin to becoming a choice for government. As Jack Layton and his caucus meet Parliament, a top objective should be to bring out the link between a weakening Canadian foreign policy, and subservience to the U.S. Duncan Cameron is associate publisher of rabble.ca. He writes from Vancouver. His column appears each Wednesday. http://www.rabble.ca/politics.shtml?x=42218

Note: http://www.rabble.ca/po...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Fri Sep 30, 2005 9:52 pm
    The only way for Canada to be a capable and component country again is to diversify its foreign and domestic policies / interests with other countries and lessen its ties / dependency on the United States of America.

    America preaches equal partners but the truth is that it is a master / slave relationship.

    The U.S. has no respect for Canada or anyone else for that matter.


    ---
    Perception is two thirds of what we perceive reality to be.

    Difficult decisions are a privilege of rank.

  2. Sat Oct 01, 2005 12:19 am
    America "preaches" nothing. America doesn't have to.

    Why?

    Because Canadians sell themselves, their country, their identity, to the Americans!

    Canada - bought and paid for.

  3. Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:04 am
    Our government isn't subservient to the US at all; its a full partner. The convervatives and liberals are both part of the same party, the neo-cons. They just put on two different faces to fool people into thinking they are somehow different from one another.

    Everything Mulroney did, Chretien and Martin have continued. Remember the Red Book? The British used to wear a red uniform to hide the blood when they were shot. The Liberals chose a red book so you couldn't see all the promises stuck through with a red marker. Remember, the GST was going to be axed, FTA was going to be abrogated, and a lot of other "promises".

    Just like Clinton, they turned coat on their election platform and went whole-hog with the opposition's platform instead.

    Stop believing that Liberal != Conservative, the truth is that Liberal = neocon = conservative. Not sure about the NDP any more.

  4. Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:57 am
    Hey precious, put a name to your self instead of hiding behind Anonymous. This way we can all know who speaks these words of wisdom for all to read!

    ---
    Perception is two thirds of what we perceive reality to be.

    Difficult decisions are a privilege of rank.

  5. Mon Oct 03, 2005 8:30 am
    The Conservatives would be worse than the Liberals. The Liberals are not afraid to sour relations in the media. The Conservatives would be like the subservient dog panting on a tight leash.<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://lfpress.ca/newsstand/CityandRegion/2005/10/03/1245827-sun.html">http://lfpress.ca/newsstand/CityandRegion/2005/10/03/1245827-sun.html</a><br />
    <br />
    From the tone of Peter MacKay it sounds to me like if we have a Conservative Government anytime soon we will likely be tied into Ballistic Missile Defence, tighter border and continental security, deregulation and privatization of all remaining protected industries.<br />
    <br />
    Paul Martin has talked in the past about diversification, which is what he has currently tried to do to protect Canadian Lumber jobs wrt Softwood. Trudeau's Third Option. He has also said: "Economic Integration is inevitable." Fair enough, but he should have thrown in social and cultural as well. Since they are all intimately related.<br />
    <br />
    From Andrew Cohen's book, While Canada Slept, Stephen Harper is quoted, "As the Team Canada record shows, the Prime Minister went back to the future. He tried to revive the failed trade diversifications of the 1970s, the Trudeau government's so-called third option, which did not work then and is not working now." <br />
    <br />
    I don't know what's worse. The man trying to fight against what he thinks is inevitable, or the man who just says, 'f$%& it, full steam ahead!' From where and when will a glorious leader come forth to courageously lead the Canadian people out of this "More, More, More" disease.<br />
    <br />
    I say No Logo, forget Brand US, shop Canadian, and become a risk taking entrepreneur that ships Canadian exports to the World!<br />
    <br />
    Also, I don't know about you, but if then train is heading full steam for a brick wall, do you really want to be on board fighting over whether you get the front seat! (Ode to David)<br />
    <br />
    TAXI!!!! (I need to get as far away from here as possible)<br />
    <br />
    - Ted<br />
    <br />



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news