In Saskatchewan, Queen Elizabeth II praised the father of Medicare, saying:
"Premier Douglas brought social consciousness to life in the policies that directly affected the lives of Canadians."Other news reports say the Queen told her audience that:
Douglas's legacy epitomised Saskatchewanians' spirit of nation-building.As premier, Tommy Douglas welcomed the Queen to Saskatchewan on her first visit there in 1951.
Note: saying say

---
If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?
---
Dave Ruston
---
If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?
---
Dave Ruston
---
If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?
---
If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?
The main importance of the Queen is legitimacy. The whole constitutional structure she is part of is something that has evolved through history. It is difficult to destroy because it has the weight of legitimate and sober change behind it.
This legitimacy is one of the bulwarks against radical movements like the one Harper leads. This is why the Cons could only be elected with Red Tory leaders. The Red Tories were the heirs to that legitimacy -- and that is the "Tory touch" the Loyalists brought to Canada after the American Revolution.
I think when people talk about the Queen making us distinct from the US, this is what they are talking about. The Americans rejected this legitimacy in the Revolution, Canadians chose to keep it. On the whole, it has made us a much healthier society.
---
If you don't like these ideas, I've got others. --Marshall McLuhan
She has a calming influence on me, in a time of radical technological change and cultural confusion.
I'm not really surprised that she had kind words to say about Tommy Douglas.
Other posters are correct when they say that Tommy would have been pleased to host her as well.
Does anyone else have a similar experience to mine, where you are becoming less critical of the monarchy as you get a little older?
My beliefs in social justice haven't changed over time. If anything, they've deepened.
But a decade ago you I wouldn't have had a lot of positive things to say about the fact that we are a constitutional monarchy instead of a republic.
And although we desperately need to change our parliamentary system to make it more representative, and senate reform is of course a good idea, I wouldn't change the main governance structure.
[ # | Reply to This ]
Hide comment...
---
"The very fact that the concept "anti-American" can exist exhibits a totalitarian streak that's pretty dramatic." Noam Chomsky