Conservatives Not So Happy With Bush Either Thx To Spending

Posted on Tuesday, January 06 at 16:53 by sthompson
While Bush has emphasized repeatedly the need to rein in spending, overall federal expenditures have grown to an estimated $2.31 trillion for the budget year that started Oct. 1. That is up from $1.86 trillion in President Clinton's final year, a rate of growth not seen for any three-year period since 1989 to 1991.

Much of the increase stems from the fight against terrorism and wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Also expanding relentlessly have been huge programs such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, which grow automatically with inflation, higher medical costs and more beneficiaries.

What has vexed conservatives most is the 31.5 percent growth since Bush took office in discretionary spending. That is the one-third of the budget lawmakers approve annually for defense, domestic security, school aid and everything else except Social Security and other benefits.

Such spending grew by an annual average of 3.4 percent during Clinton's eight years.

Further infuriating conservatives, Bush and the Republican-run Congress have enacted a $400 billion, 10-year enlargement of Medicare; $87 billion in expanded benefits for farmers; and $40 billion for increased veterans' payments and the Air Force's leasing and buying of refueling tankers."

Full article: Conservatives simmer as spending mushrooms under Bush

Note: Conservatives simmer as...

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Jan 07, 2004 1:44 am
    Bush is doing just the opposite of what he is telling the public - spending like a drunken sailor and cutting taxes big time.

    How can you have it both ways ?? Only Bush knows for sure. Restraint ? He doesn\'t know the meaning of the word !

    Balanced budget ? Not in my lifetime !!

    I still like Dennis Kucinich\'s idea: Get out of Iraq, cancel All contracts given to the big U.S. corporations like Halliburton, give the options to the rest of the world, bring in UN troops and rotate the US troops home.

    He says that could be done in just a few months.

    Nice dream, won\'t happen, he won\'t get elected. He wants to cut the Pentagon budget by 15%, and that\'s enough to put him in someone\'s gunsights. That\'s $60 billion. A lot could be done with that.

    Anybody but Bush next time, they can\'t possibly do any worse.







    ---
    "Arrogance in Politics is unacceptable"
    Jim Callaghan
    Minden, Ontario
    705-286-1860
    www.misterc.ca

  2. Wed Jan 07, 2004 3:43 am
    <i>they can't possibly do any worse.</i><p> Americans can suprise you! Pat *cough* Buchannan *cough*.<p><p>---<br>"History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme" Mark Twain

  3. Wed Jan 07, 2004 7:50 pm
    What\'s that saying about the devil you know versus the one you don\'t know? Plus, let\'s have no illusions--the American imperialist project has existed long before Bush and likely will exist long after as well. However, getting somebody even a BIT more moderate in office might slow things down again at least.

  4. by avatar Jesse
    Thu Jan 08, 2004 12:27 am
    Indeed, US imperialism has been around since the days of Manifest Destiny.

    ---
    JvH

  5. Thu Jan 08, 2004 7:34 am
    I think it\'s more important that we get some people in power in this country to stand up for us, against the U.S. corporate global plan, and for Canadians! No matter who the U.S. elects we still need a strong, national government that caters to Canadians\' needs and not the corporations desires.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news