Industry Minister Allan Rock has awarded U.S. military company Lockheed Martin the contract to prepare a 2005 test run of the next Canadian census. Lockheed Martin, which manufactures ballistic missiles and other weapons of mass destruction, is also a prime candidate to receive a contract to do the entire Canadian census in 2006.
This action has expired. Please use our new action, located here!
Note: here
- Susan
Allan
---
Dave Ruston
Folks... we\'re in a global economy. God forbid a Canadian company was scrutinized the way that Lockheed is now for offering a cost-effective solution to a country\'s census program. Don\'t tell me you\'d pay more money for a 100% Canadian made product or service even if you knew it was more expensive AND not as efficient as a non-Cdn one? If you say yes, I\'d like to see you practice this in everyday life. I think not!
Get your head out of your a$$, folks. We benefit greatly from this. Boycotting will only waste taxpayers\' money by reducing the effectiveness of the census, which enables Canadian firms (or firms interested in Canada) to enhance their business to our fellow Canucks.
Ok, I\'m done my rant!
(Now this should spark some interesting posts!)
---
Dave Ruston
When the info will be stored by a company that makes no bones about \"we remember who we serve\" - the US government - that is troubling to say the least.
There is a proven track record of US military contractors giving away personal info to the US government.
A census about Canadians, for Canadians, to serve Canadians should be done by Canadians - end of story.
Going cheap is not always the best solution. You even admit that is the way of globalization. Does it work - most of the time it does not. We always hear about how privatization of this or that will result in more efficient delivery at a cheaper cost.
Quote me ONE TIME that has come true! From one end of this nation to the other we see how the corporate end does things - from power delivery to auto insurance it always costs more and with a degradation of delivery and service. Remember now - public - by its very name serves the public with oversight by the public and held accountable by the public. Private serves themselves for profit, with oversight by nobody, and accountable to nobody but their bean counters.
How do we benefit from this? You failed to answer or give reasoning for your assumption.
Lets take another government contract given to an American company. The Canadian Tourism Commission through Fodors commissioned the Canadian travel guide. They managed to omit a territory, misnamed another, overlooked whole sections of provinces, and left out whole cities.
So again, how was that beneficial for the few cents less it cost to go with the cheap bid? And you want the same for OUR census!? That census is a basis of funding in Canada - should we just \'trust\' them to do it right? Should we just trust them to hold the info close and not give it away?
NOT!
Or run yourself as an independent candidate in the next, put your time and your money into yourself.
There is nothing to stop you from getting on the ballot, this is the best form of a civil action, you can take and yes boycott the census taking by any American Company.
---
Good government is not a party government