Disagreeing To Agree: How And Why Same-Sex Marriage Acts As A Smokescreen

Posted on Monday, February 21 at 17:09 by notacolony.ca

While majorities in their respective parties do disagree on re-defining marriage, and there is substantial popular opposition, it’s too late for debate: gay marriage is already a fact on the ground. There are exactly two ways, both political non-starters, to un-ring this bell: sidestep the Charter of Rights and Freedoms by invoking the so-called notwithstanding clause; or amend the constitution. Everything else, as they say, is just chatter. 

But both leaders would rather debate this decided issue than be seen agreeing on something far more contentious: their desire to cave in to President Bush's demand to support America’s Ballistic Missile Defense plan, a.k.a. Star Wars, which is a component of Deep Integration

If a parliamentary vote were held today, Martin would likely need Conservative votes to pass a bill approving of Canada's participation. Such a vote is not a legal necessity, but a political one, given the government's minority status. 

A November poll put the public 56% against Canada’s involvement with 40% strongly opposed and 16% somewhat opposed. These numbers are consistent with the country’s long-standing opposition to the weaponization of space. Also saying no to Star Wars are the Bloc Quebecois, the NDP, real Liberals, Quebec Liberals, and old Tories.

Lately, Martin and Harper have blurred their positions somewhat, due to public outrage over the President’s visit and the pushy tone of both Bush and his undiplomatic ambassador, Paul Cellucci. Same-sex marriage is keeping BMD out of the headlines, but the clock is ticking and Washington is waiting for an answer. Canadian public opinion is the only thing holding Martin back as it appears that BMD may very well mean for him what the Iraq war meant for Jean Chrétien: a defining moment where Ottawa must say no to prove its independence from Washington.

But Paul Martin, like Stephen Harper, is a continentalist, firmly in the pro-integration camp, unconcerned with maintaining Canadian sovereignty. He is a right-wing Liberal backed by those who stand to directly profit from BMD (like the Canadian defense and high-tech industries), and those who just can’t fathom saying no to their imperial master (like the editorial writers at the Globe and Mail).

Canadians should expect a flurry of propaganda from think-tanks and the corporate media arguing that BMD is in Canada’s interest to support, and that only a fool would be opposed. We’ll be told that it’s time to support America, and that if we don’t do our part to defend our country, we should no longer expect the Americans to protect us from evil-doers and terrorists. BMD supporters will play the economic card, the 'good neighbour' card and the freeloader card. They’ll use shame, guilt and fear.

All of this is will be specifically aimed at moving those in the “somewhat opposed” camp over to a more neutral position. Then Martin can obey President Bush without worrying too much about appearances, even if he needs Harper’s votes to pass some meaningless gesture in the house.

Whether public opinion shifts or not is an open question. Both the Liberals and the Conservatives have conventions coming up and have rather weak leaders. Martin has the Quebec and 'real Liberal' wings of the party to contend with while Harper struggles to keep the Tory and Reform factions away from one another’s throats and under his thumb.

Instead of pretending that he is trying to stop gay marriage, Stephen Harper should try to stop Paul Martin from supporting Star Wars. A bold move, such as announcing that he will not back anything that compromises Canadian sovereignty, is what it's going to take if he wants to become prime minister.

That would put the Conservative Party on the same side as the Canadian electorate, and force Paul Martin to either own the unpopular decision to support this crazy scheme outright, or to follow Harper in saying no to President Bush. 

Copyright © 2005 NotaColony.ca [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on February 22, 2005]

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by avatar Milton
    Tue Feb 22, 2005 1:27 am
    It is not same sex marriage that is keeping BMD out of the headlines, it is the media moguls that are keeping BMD out of the headlines and using same sex marriage as a WMD ( weapon of mass distraction ). Distract, distract, distract, move along, nothing to see here, cause if there was, don't you think the media would report it? Well don't you? There is no conspiracy, it is just a coincidence.

  2. Tue Feb 22, 2005 2:57 am
    Which is why we need to get this marriage crap out of the way.

  3. Tue Feb 22, 2005 2:57 am
    same sex is a soft issue and that is what today's media loves to trollop onto the masses.

    NMD takes some thinking and background to understand. that takes away from kneejerk editorials and ad space. NMD is far too complex for the media whores to trot out for mass consumption. but gays! oh easy pickings, and easy for the masses to get on either side for.

  4. by avatar nutter
    Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:28 am
    Today I TURNED DOWN an opportunity to make a few bucks delivering two Mainstream Media newspapers. Easy cash, even get a bit of excercise. Why? Because I came to realize I'm revolted by 'newspapers', the distractive headlines, misinformation, brainwashing, It's all too much. I went out with the regular delivery guy, and I couldn't even muster the will to TOUCH the newspaper... really quite a surprise, I didn't think I'd react like this.

    Do people know that this National Newspaper is delivered every day except Christmas? I bet you didn't know that. I wonder why? Is it because the bullsheit peddlers don't want to let you go? Every stinking day but ONE. amazing.

    The route was so spread out, like I'd need a car to deliver the papers. And we're talking typical interurban streets. In fact the guy was counting on me running my car around, AS IF. Wants to get me to use my money for gas and wear 'n tear. You know what I found out? So few people want newspaper delivery, that huge gaps are occuring in routes, making them ever more inefficient to service with personal delivery. I looked at the economics, and said "NO MAS"

  5. Tue Feb 22, 2005 7:40 am
    hopefully corporate crap media will die in the medium of newspapers. save some trees and save us from the bullshit. thing is they still control that teet known as TV. as long as they control that, they control the minds of those that refuse to ask questions.

  6. by hoopoe
    Tue Feb 22, 2005 8:00 am
    I have been absolutely amazed how people have been able to get so worked up over same-sex marriage since it is really such a nonissue when it comes to the impact passing a law in favor of it would have on an individual's life. In contrast to this, I am even more amazed how people can show such little interest in matters that will deeply affect them such as BMD and deeper integration with US policy. When looking at the letters to the editor in the Calgary papers the number published about gay marriage far outnumbers those on BMD, etc.

    Of course in line with the article and the comments one has to be deeply suspicious of an agenda being put forth by these media moguls to distract from more important issues that they want to see become government policy.

  7. Tue Feb 22, 2005 4:54 pm
    I find it amazing that the people who demand a voice for Canada don’t demand a voice for ordinary Canadians. The activist judges have claimed our right to decide issue after issue and we are mad because it’s not streamlined enough. Don’t ever think that they are going to return your rights when we get to your favorite projects. We all bought into this and I don’t see any way we can change things now. Get use to it. It’s going to be forever.

  8. Tue Feb 22, 2005 5:41 pm
    Please clarify what you mean, I honestly don't get what you are trying to say
    (no offense intended).

  9. Sat Feb 26, 2005 10:17 pm
    I fully agree. Harper and martin copied GeorgeW. approach in 2004 election-distracting the public with gay marriage etc away from the real issue of the failed war in Iraq.I know because I lived there.R.G. Mac Donald.M.D. Quebec

  10. Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:25 am
    Marriage and missile defence. Canadians don't want to defend themselves and don't even want the defence provided by others anymore either. Probably because a 'nation' that has decided to render its institutions meaningless is not worth defending. Guys can go out and marry all their brothers or they will soon be able to breed up a bunch of women just like cattle - who in their right mind aspires to this kind of crap? Canada has become a shitty little navel gazing bunch of drooling social engineers. Pathetic.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news