The Germans, Belgians, and French arrived in what is now the Central African Republic in 1885. In 1887 the French signed a convention with Congo giving them control over the Oubangui River. In 1894 the French made Oubangui-Chari one of their territories. In 1910 it became part of the Federation of French Equatorial Africa (A.E.F.). The French instituted a plantation-style economy which stayed in place, gradually weakening, until the Central African Republic declared independence in 1960.
1966 saw Jean-Bédel Bokassa take over the country in a coup, abolish the constitution, and begin rule by decree. Bokassa was supported through coup and assassination attempts by France who needed uranium from the Central African Republic to support their nuclear program. Even after finally supporting a coup against Bokassa in 1979 in favour of David Dacko, France granted Bokassa asylum from charges of treason, murder, cannibalism and embezzlement.
Dacko was overthrown by General André Kolingba who slowly, under political pressure brought democracy to the Central African Republic. In 1993 elections were held and Ange-Félix Patassé won his first six year term as president. Patassé won another six year term in 1999 and, with the help of French and UN forces, held onto power until 2003 when rebels installed General François Bozizé as president. The latest coup took place while the world’s eyes were on Iraq last year. The violence in Central Africa did not make the mainstream news.
That is a short and incomplete history that brings us up to the present. The present is not a wonderful time to be a Central African according to the CIA World Fact Book’s entry for the Central African Republic. AIDS is running between twelve and fifteen percent, life expectancy is just over 41 years, infant mortality is just over 92 deaths per 1,000 births, only about half over the age of fifteen can read and write, and political upheaval in the neighbouring countries of Chad and Sudan have a tendency to bubble over the borders.
In spite of deforestation and desertification being major environmental problems, timber is the main agricultural product for export. There are uranium, diamonds, gold and possibly oil in the Central African Republic, but most of the resources are not being exploited and those that are tend to be exploited in ways that harm the environment. The proceeds from that exploitation stay in the hands of the wealthy (the richest 10% of Central Africans control almost 48% of the wealth). Much of the wealth created by the exploitation of natural resources, mostly diamonds at this point, is taken out of the country by the foreign conglomerates who control the operations. Meanwhile according to the UN 95% of Central Africans live on less than two dollars a day.
The International Monetary Fund and World Bank are deeply involved in the region and pushing for the same sort of development, trade, and economic reforms that have caused so many problems elsewhere.
The Central African Republic does have resources to trade and the G8 members involved would very much like to access those resources. There are few roads and little infrastructure but the building of roads and infrastructure risks the possibility of opening the area up to conflict from Sudan, Chad, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. There are already approximately 200,000 internally displaced persons in the Central African Republic and with the precarious nature of the nation’s food supply, risking further conflict in the area could be a recipe for disaster.
At the same time, the lack of roads and infrastructure mean that 1,000,000 Central Africans live in isolation and do not have access to education and health care. As one of the ten worst affected countries in the HIV/AIDS crisis that has even more dire implications because the crisis cannot be effectively dealt with if health care and education are not readily available.
There are also ecological concerns. A reasonable part of the Central African Republic’s future development could depend on tourism and scientific study. Roads and infrastructure are necessary to accommodate those things, but too much development carried out in the wrong ways can have a serious negative impact on the development of wild life preserves, the continuation of cultural traditions, and the overall supply of basics like potable water. Too often in the rush to develop natural resources or develop an eco-tourism industry, such things are put on the back burner. In the end that undermines attempts to take advantage of those resources to improve the lives of local inhabitants.
The Central African Republic is not immune to the problem of bushmeat being taken and lost 30,000 hectares of forest between 1990 and 2000 according to the World Wildlife Fund and Monga Bay. Child soldiers are also a factor. While these problems are much less in the Central African Republic than other African nations, they can become much worse if the proper steps are not taken.
The Central African Republic’s history is very instructive to those concerned about imperialism. It has suffered greatly in the past under colonial rule. It continues to suffer today under the influence of past colonial masters, and the present funding of the IMF and World Bank. It is presently on the cusp of moving forward, with democratic elections tentatively scheduled for 2005, and the direction the country takes could go either way. We can create another state where civil war runs rampant and poverty, disease, violence, and terror are constant companions. We can allow yet another state to fail because of economic concerns.
We can also work with the people of the Central African Republic to create an example of how to do things properly. Canada has a considerable expertise in mining in remote areas. While our environmental record is far from immaculate, or even good, we also have considerable knowledge in that area. A prominent Canadian, Stephen Lewis, is the UN Special Envoy for HIV/AIDS in Africa. Paul Martin seems to have somewhat of a relationship with Bono, who has chosen to champion not only AIDS, but debt relief for countries that have fallen in to straits they cannot escape under the current system. Perhaps Bono can have a chat with Mr. Martin about the importance of African states overcoming their problems and succeeding. We can push for debt reduction and for loans from the International Monetary Fund to be forgiven and for economic restructuring not to be based on the usual model of subservient client state selling raw materials to the developed world at discount prices.
Canada has expertise in rural development and water purification. We are proficient in technology. We have an abundance of educated people who can teach what we’ve learned to the people of the Central African Republic.
Canada is already somewhat involved in the Central African Republic. The Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) is already involved in a program to demobilise soldiers there. They provide a transitional allowance and some business training to soldiers who will put down their weapons. It is an important program but we need to do more if the Central African Republic is to succeed.
If Canada wants to move forward in the world while helping others, and we continue to at least pay lip service to those goals, there are worse places to start than the Central African Republic. The problems they are facing are not yet insurmountable and they can become an example of how to do things right.
By helping the Central African Republic we can show the world that there is a better way, that something can be done.
--- Reverend Blair was raised in Saskatchewan and currently lives in Winnipeg, Manitoba. He comes from a long line of social activists and cried on Tommy Douglas before his first birthday. His column appears biweekly on Vive le Canada.
Note: Central African Republic
Jean-Bédel Bokassa
entry
International Monetary ...
World Bank
problems
bushmeat
30,000 hectares
factor
Stephen Lewis
AIDS
debt relief
expertise
The Canadian Internati...
---
Dave Ruston
I think that's what our leaders have been doing...ignoring the problem. When is the last time a Canadian leader stood up and gave a speech pushing Canadian aid programs? Not as a political photo-op, I mean, but because they were trying to inspire others.
Having tooted my horn, let me say that most of what you write is bang on. The only place I take exception is with the suggestion that Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) poses a threat to CAR. The usual reasons for conflict in this part of the world are (not in any particular order): ethnic animosity, pastoral versus farming, the exploitation of resources.
A significant number of Congolese live in CAR where they sought refuge either from DRC's civil war (1998-2003) or from the recent spate of ethnic unrest in the northeastern Ituri region of Province Orientale. As well, there are many Congolese working in the CAR diamond mines but they have been asked to leave. Although CAR initially tried to eject them en masse and almost overnight, negotations between Bangui and Kinshasa eventually produced a more workable plan. All of those people are slowly repatriating.
That is the only issue that could have potentially created a DRC-CAR conflict. Following CAR's brief civil war in 1997, they settled into a relative peace and actually managed to keep out of DRC during the latter's civil war (something seven other neighbours can't say). And since the establishment of DRC's transitional government in February 2003 and the overthrow of CAR's government in March 2003, DRC and CAR have a common goal ... a transition to democracy. There are many critics who doubt that either of them will get there, or even want to get there, but that remains to be seen. Joseph Kabila in DRC and François Bozizé in CAR have much in common.
The pastoral versus farming conflict doesn't influence DRC-CAR relations and neither does the resource issue. DRC (formerly Zaïre) is said to be the most resource-rich chunk of real estate on the planet. It is all they can do to protect their own assets, the last thing they will consider is going after CAR's.
If there is conflict in DRC's future, it will surely arise out of ethnic animosity in its eastern provinces along the borders with Uganda, Burundi, and especially Rwanda. The ethnic issues that caused Rwanda's 1994 débacle have not gone away and continue to bubble just below the surface. DRC has far too much on its plate with those 'friends' and is far too busy with a transitional govrenment designed to bring about its first democratic elections in more than 40 years to be concerned about challenging the resources of a nation that is comparatively resource-poor.
I applaud your call for action from Canada. There is much we can offer to this part of the world because of expertise we possess but it should also be a natural thing for us to do anyway ... we belong with those nations to La Francophonie, and cooperation should almost be a given. There is little assistance they can offer us but there is much we can provide them. And both sides would stand to enjoy enormous economic benefit from such cooperation. Besides, we should do it just because it is the right thing to do, and because no one else is doing it.
I'm afraid, though, that following these stories as I have has left me somewhat jaded and I find myself agreeing with Roméo Dallaire ... Western nations stay out of central Africa not because the problems are immense, but because the people are black. They don't matter.
In my humble opinion
Best regards,
Paul Harris
PS ... I met Tommy numerous times as an adult living in Regina. Never cried on him, though.
I'll certainly defer to your greater knowledge on that point though. Of course the next time I end up writing about Africa, you'll likely get an e-mail.
I find myself agreeing with Dallaire a lot too. We only show up when there's something in it for us. I find that extremely troubling because it over-rides the obvious...that there's always something in building relationships even if doesn't seem like it at first.
I definitely agree with you on the economic point as well...it would pay off. I don't think that's the right reason to help though. We should help just because we can.
DRC is getting a tremendous boost from the most unlikely of sources ... South Africa and just the personality of Thabo Mbeki creates some measure of confidence.
I think CAR's chances for an improved future are much more solid than DRC's but they might both surprise their critics and do very well. They do need help and I think Canada should be there to offer that help ... because it is right and moral. If we benefit from it, so be it, but our motivation should be humanitarian.
But I concede the point about a conflict in any of those countries having serious impact on neighbours because of the flow of refugees. I still consider the biggest threat in the area to be Rwanda because of the longstanding Hutu-Tutsi conflict ... another centuries old rivalry that white people managed to inflame into murderous hatred.
And I should have said more forcefully that I fully agree we should be there to help solely because it is the right thing to do. That should always be what drives our actions.
I remember travelling in a backwater part of Venezuela two years ago when I met some people from Honduras. They were delighted to meet a Canadian. They had vivid memories of Hurricane Mitch (1998) that inflicted so much damage and felt the need to thank me personally for the assistance Canada provided. They commented that Canadians and Americans were both there quickly but there was a palpable difference between us: The Americans showed up and took over, we showed up and asked how we could help. To them, that was a significant difference ... even when trying to help, Americans come across as bullies.
Anyhow, Blair, it is a very good piece and it is nice to have some company in trying to remind the world of what is going on in equatorial Africa.
Paul Harris
---
RickW