Several weeks ago, members of Congress apologized to Arar as he testified by video from Canada before a joint hearing of a House of Representatives subcommittee about what he called the "immoral" terrorism-fighting program known as extraordinary rendition.
The practice allows the U.S. government to grab suspected terrorists in one country and fly them to their home country or another where they are wanted for a crime or questioning.
In a courtroom packed with several hundred spectators, the judges heard arguments for more than an hour in the case. They did not immediately rule on whether a federal judge in Brooklyn was right to toss out the case Arar brought against the U.S. government.
Sack repeatedly questioned Jeffrey Bucholtz, a deputy assistant attorney general, about the limits of U.S. government authority.
"The Constitution doesn't apply to aliens abroad," Bucholtz said. He added that it was "not designed to govern what happens the world over."
http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5ib8AvNOAs6eHz8K7V1eyt91tJ0cg
Note: http://canadianpress.go...

Laws of their constitution doesn't go beyound their border and explains why no law is applicable to overseas Americans. Their law says no other laws are valid, as far as Americans are concerned. If Arar was an American citizen, the Americans would have saved the costs of his return.
---
Expect little from life and get more from it.
And yet, the US has a policy that International passengers who have already cleared customs of the country they are travelling to; must disembark protected areas and pass again through US customs.
Which is where they picked up Arar. ON US SOIL. So, tell me again the US constitution doesn't apply.
---
The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.