Deep Integration And The New North American Man.

Posted on Monday, February 28 at 17:26 by notacolony.ca

The exclusion of the general public from this historical debate is not a conspiracy. It's merely a reflection of how the real power lies outside of Canada, in Corporate-Occupied Washington. And the media don't talk much about it because they are part of the same corporate system. Why further rile an angry public who want less  to do with the New America. 

Nor is it John Manley himself who is uniquely important to deliver the goods to Washington. Like Brian Mulroney before him, he merely represents a constituency. And while Manley's group will only make recommendations, it will have the ear of the governments of Canada, Mexico and the United States. The Task Force for the Future of North America (TFFNA) cannot be ignored. 

The TFFNA is a pet project of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Membership in the CFR is “restricted to U.S. citizens” who come mainly from the corporate or political world, and others who share their view.

According to its website, the CFR’s mandate is to spread its gospel so that interested parties “can better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other governments.”

In other words, they offer free advice on imperial management.

The TFFNA is an ambitious project, and somewhat unique for the CFR in that “unlike other Council-sponsored task forces, which focus primarily on U.S. policy, this initiative includes participants from Canada and Mexico, as well as the United States, and will make policy recommendations for all three countries.”

Policy recommendations that, if implemented, will finally kill-off the meager amount of political sovereignty that remains in Canada after years of corporate-driven, NAFTA-rule.

The push for Deep Integration, a.k.a NAFTA-plus, has so far mainly come from the corporate community in Canada, the think tanks on their payroll, and their cheerleaders in academia. The TTFNA is different. It is the mother-of-all continentalist projects, a who’s who of power and influence, from all three countries, hammering-out a collective vision for a corporate super-state they hope will rival a rising China and a rejuvenated Europe. 

A recently leaked but barely-covered (of the so-called national papers, only the Toronto Star ran it) confidential summary of the TFFNA’s first meeting lays out the short and long term “integration” goals for North America. Honest people would call these suggestions what they are: a roadmap for full and formal control of the neighbours and their resources by the United States. To call it “integration” is misleading. It conjures up images of a European-style continental integration with several bigger partners and wiggle-room for smaller powers. North America, however, consists of a superpower and two much weaker neighbours. If there is a comparison to Europe, it’s when Germany and Austria “integrated” in 1938.  What is being sought is “anschluss American-style”, and it needs to be exposed for what it is, so that it can be stopped. 

In short, Deep Integration is a process aimed at securing and strengthening the economic center of the US Empire, locking-in past gains and cracking-open new opportunities for corporate penetration into areas previously protected for the public good. Here is what the corporate-state leaders want from their immediate neighbours. They want control of everything that they don’t already control through NAFTA, like Canada’s water and Mexico’s oil. They want to further integrate the military command structure of Canada and Mexico into US power. Using “security concerns” due to the never-ending, so-called “War on Terror” as an all-encompassing excuse, they want to harmonize immigration and foreign policy. 

Make no mistake about it; Canada's current level of economic integration is unacceptable to a post 9-11 Washington. Another large attack, when it comes, will produce calls for a garrison state that cannot and will not be ignored. So the choice is really between Deep Integration and Deep Independence. If some future attacker has any connection to Canada whatsoever, Canada will be blamed. Border security politics will blot out everything else. And because investors and corporations see it as “extremely costly to all three countries”, the planners are counting on an unwillingness to return to a pre-NAFTA reality.  

But wait. Why would regular Canadians and Mexicans want to transfer their remaining autonomy to the USA? And isn’t it a little untimely to be holding discussions about deepening ties when America has spent the last four years descending into something that looks like fascism? Where the citizens re-elect a war criminal President and don’t seem to care about the killing of tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis in an unjustified and illegal war? Where reports of torture illicit little outrage yet suggestions of same-sex marriage provoke hysteria?

Brand USA is at an all-time global low. And that is why the TFFNA wants to keep the focus on the integration of the North American continent instead of the disintegration of the Canadian State. 

Which creates a little dilemma.

There is no such thing as a shared identity in North America like that which exists in Europe and Asia, to counterbalance the loss of national identity that integration inevitably brings. The planners acknowledge this and suggest manufacturing a North American brand, using the mass media and education systems to sell a previously non-existent shared history and identity. 

They even suggest a North American passport. This would accomplish the extra goal of harmonizing a mandatory domestic identification program with a single standard for all three countries. This identification would be for internal use only, more like the Soviet Union than Europe. 

Task Force members know these things will be a tough sell but they are confident that if they remain patient, and keep pushing, they will prevail. Instead of mentioning public resistance, they refer to “serious obstacles” and concede that “contentious or intractable issues will take more time to ripen politically.”

To be sure, elite sectors of Canada and Mexico have no objection, and will gleefully promote and participate in the annihilation of their own countries. After all, there are plenty of John Manleys around. But there are far more citizens who actually want less America, not more.

The decision to stay out of Iraq was wildly popular in both Mexico and Canada. America might be in a rightward drift, but it is progressive forces to her north and south that are on the march.  And other states in the neighbourhood are celebrating a renewed sense of independence and hopefulness. Defiant symbols like Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and Brazilian President Lula da Silva are energizing other nationalist political forces in the region. 

In spite of a clear divergence in values between majorities in Canada and the USA, the Canadian public still makes a clear distinction between its dislike of American policy and its fondness for Americans in general. But just because you like your neighbour does not mean you want to move in with him.

When the TFFNA completes its work, and presents it conclusions, John Manley can count on kid-glove treatment from the media. The “suggestions” he presents will be sold as a cure when they are really just more of the disease. Organized political opposition to the destruction of Canada must emerge and push back.

Clearly, this is much bigger than the political goals of one man, and it is unimportant whether it is Manley or someone else who delivers the goods. Someone will emerge to finish off what  Brian Mulroney started, and if he fails, another will surely pop-up. As long as the moment is here, the man will appear. It is up to those who care about Canada's survival to change the moment, to inform and encourage the citizens to awaken and stop the destruction of their national political space and their popular sovereignty. And when the John Manleys can no longer suggest destroying the country in order to save it, without destroying their political careers, we will know that the time for a more independent Canada has arrived. 

Copyright © 2005 Nota Colony.ca          

Home


Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:49 am
    John Manley has never been anything but an American wannabee much like Brian Mulroney. He had absolutely no empathy or respect for Canadians. He left politics to make money and there is money to be made in being promoting the agenda of the power elite the United States.

  2. Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:45 am
    I doubt he'll ever win. Another French-Canadian quisling wouldn't be any better though.

  3. Tue Mar 01, 2005 5:07 am
    The conjecture in this article is imagination run wild. But anyhow, Manley's associated with the Liberal stink in this country and for that reason he shouldn't be trusted. The Liberals have proven themselves to be thieves, liars and double-talkers - what decent person could possibly want to associate themselves with that group?

  4. Tue Mar 01, 2005 5:39 am
    The man has been 'outed' and I expect he will be greeted with polite smiles at the convention, and if not, then God help us all.

  5. by N Say
    Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:30 am
    i too think that there is a bit too much imagination in this editorial, however the fact that manley is working with the council on foreign relations is pretty disturbing. check this book out:<br />
    <a href="http://www.canadiandemocraticmovement.ca/books-index-req-view_book_details-bkid-29.html">http://www.canadiandemocraticmovement.ca/books-index-req-view_book_details-bkid-29.html</a><br />
    <br />
    or this review:<br />
    <a href="http://www.eco.utexas.edu/faculty/Cleaver/357Lsum_s2_ShoupMinter.html">http://www.eco.utexas.edu/faculty/Cleaver/357Lsum_s2_ShoupMinter.html</a><br />
    <br />
    that's the sort of stuff the council on foreing relations plans out, and that's who manley is working closely with. :o<p>---<br>"George Bush has declared the war on terrorism to be the cause of his generation. The cause of Canadian sovereignty will be ours." - John Godfrey, MP for Don Va

  6. Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:47 am
    Pathetic. Anyone think a public campaign against him would occur should he run?

  7. Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:57 pm
    John Manley made a smart strategic move to distant himself from Mr. Dithers, Mr. Petticoat, Mr. Graham and that mob. It can get pretty smelly in the pig pen and he will look like Mr. Clean when his opportunity arises. Beside these guys are just professional Canadians (they are paid to be Canadians). When they are out of office and off the dole they generally gravitate to directorships on boards of GM, Kraft, US Steel, McDonnel Douglas or Coors/Molson, Wendys/Tim Hortons. Pick any of the Dow 30 listed on NYSE and you'll no doubt find at least one Canadian. MMMMM....now where could I find more about these jobs?

  8. Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:03 pm
    Canadians love the conspiracy theory. Maybe Mr. Manley is working for the CIA or he alone knows where Elvis is living.

  9. Wed Mar 02, 2005 1:51 am
    The CFR has always been the major think tank for US imperialism. What ever they are into - watch out!

  10. Wed Mar 02, 2005 4:17 am
    Do you think anarcho that a public campaign could tarnish him enough to not be nominated?

    ---
    The midget, Bush, and that Rumsfield deserve only to be beaten with shoes by freedom loving people everywhere.

    - Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, The Iraqi Informat

  11. Wed Mar 02, 2005 4:42 am
    The guy behind the documentary about Paul Martin, should maybe focus his attention on Manley. A documentary about Manley would be interesting to watch.

    Kevin

  12. by em
    Wed Mar 02, 2005 5:34 am
    "Organized political opposition to the
    destruction of Canada must emerge & push
    back." Most Canadians, if they knew about
    the TTFNA, would oppose its policies. So
    how does one get the word out?

  13. by N Say
    Wed Mar 02, 2005 5:39 am
    the same way that people stopped star wars. this would be really no different

    ---
    "George Bush has declared the war on terrorism to be the cause of his generation. The cause of Canadian sovereignty will be ours." - John Godfrey, MP for Don Va

  14. Wed Mar 02, 2005 7:01 am
    Someone on this thread said;

    ""George Bush has declared the war on terrorism to be
    the cause of his generation. The cause of Canadian
    sovereignty will be ours." - John Godfrey, MP for Don
    Va"
    ...perhaps, perhaps?

    ...but let me ask - exactly how will we make Canadian
    sovereignty the cause of this generation - thusfar we
    have had excellent speeches and books from great
    Canadians Mel Watkins, Maude Barlow, the Council of
    Canadians, Linda McQuaig, Murray Dobbin's writings,
    and an absolute plethora of others...and still those who
    hold 'the powers' that will make or break this nation -
    continue, essentially on the same path.

    So, to my mind, if we continue writing such books and
    giving such speeches, --lambasting "their policies"
    there will indeed be some battles won...but will we win
    in the end by such tactics--and can we really 'win' just
    by lambasting their policies/programs...without offering
    a substantive alternative and positive vision for a
    sovereign Canada? - I do not think it sanguine to think
    so, whilst perhaps dreamers may?



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news