Who Is Paul Martin?

Posted on Monday, March 15 at 11:00 by sthompson
We ask, not to dampen the national enthusiasm for a prime minister who will both lead us and choose how we identify ourselves and tackle our deepening social deficit, but to be clearheaded about where he will likely go, and to sharpen our resolve to either encourage the direction or to resist and critique it.

This is the man who claims a deep affinity with his father, Paul Martin Sr., Liberal member for Windsor for many years, a small-town lawyer, then politician and left-leaning Cabinet member. But Paul Jr. spent 30 year as a Chief Executive Officer for two companies, Power Corporation and Canada Steamship Lines (CSL).

Company officers universally have a goal, clearly stated in Mark Achbarıs new film The Corporation; (see review p.18): maximize profits and cut away losing holdings. But public office calls for a crucial understanding of and commitment to the public interest, not to the bottom line.

Does Mr Martin own up to the fact that Canada is now in 8th place in the annual United Nations Human Development Index? Does he recognize that social inequality grew in Canada during his term as Finance Minister, when he was consumed by deficit cutting? Does he stay awake nights thinking about child poverty, and how it has increased, despite all pledges to the contrary? Is he pleased by a higher number of low-paying jobs? Does he hear Canadians declare they do not want our foreign policy made in Washington and are utterly opposed to Star Wars II? How much did he know about the sponsorship scandal, and when?

In 2000, Martin sat on a five-year, $193 billion surplus but, transfixed by deficit hysteria, refused to mend the safety net which he had virtually destroyed. The Centre for Policy Alternatives and the Manitoba justice coalition Choices showed that the deficit targets could be met without a single spending cut. His insensitive choices, always accompanied by grandiloquent language, show him as a man out-of-step with Canadian values. Martin seems to have repudiated the Liberal "Red Book" of 1993, and moved instead to embrace the "Washington Consensus", a program marked by privatization, deregulation, smaller government and unfettered free trade.

Is this gentleman (regarded by many as charming, intellectually curious and decent) trustworthy? Or is he in the lap of the Business Council on National Issues (now called the Canadian Council of Chief Executives)? We cannot avoid asking, does CSL continue to ply international waters with its 16 ships registered under "flags of convenience" (i.e. Bahamas), thus escaping Canadian tax and labour law? Lastly, does he really believe that ongoing approval from the generally-disregarded federal Ethics Counsellor constitutes any kind of a moral guide to be followed?

Progressive Canadians, seeking a just society and a independent place for Canada in the world, must catch and keep Paul Martin's ear. As veteran writer Douglas Fisher said of the throne speech, "Such a profusion of intentions but a minimum of specifics." We need to persistently stay in the vision of the Liberal government. As John Mitchell, Richard Nixon's attorney general said in the 1970s: "Watch what we do, not what we say."

Canadians wanting an activist government which favours the common good must pay attention to our prime minister's deeds, rather than his language.

----------
Copyright Catholic New Times.
Reprinted with permission.

Note: Catholic New Times Catholic New Times

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Mon Mar 15, 2004 9:51 pm
    Oh, and under those flags of convenience, he ran, ready.... drumroll.............SWEATSHIPS! Will he allow the Washington concensus to turn Canada into a SWEATSTATE?

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  2. Tue Mar 16, 2004 12:09 am
    Good article, hope that many people will read it and heed the warning.

  3. Tue Mar 16, 2004 3:37 am
    I'm not the only one that has noticed this about Martin then. In one of my emails to him I stated that if I was to just listen to him he could convince me he had Canada's best interests at heart but by chosing the people he did to fill out his cabinet said something completley different to me. And for me. ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS. He does not have Canada's best interest at heart.

  4. Tue Mar 16, 2004 7:00 am
    I know, it is really hard when he says all the right things. I'm just waiting for a serious issue to come along to really highlight where he stands.

  5. Tue Mar 16, 2004 8:34 am
    Anonymous,

    I think it was serious enough that he never spoke out against Aristide being ousted. And if he doesn't speak out against the U.S. ousting Chavez I'll never forgive him.

  6. Wed Mar 17, 2004 8:55 am
    A money w*ore.

  7. by avatar Milton
    Wed Mar 17, 2004 4:33 pm
    Right on , perturbed. He is heavy and he ain't my brother. Remember the magician wants you looking at the wrong hand. He wasn't cutting deficits, he was cutting corporate taxes and social programs. Welfare for the rich and the poor will tighten their belts cause there is not enough to go around cause some rich guy says so. I know they didn't take a global inventory because if they had they would have found more than enough to go around.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news