Focus On North American Energy

Posted on Tuesday, August 16 at 13:04 by jensonj
Oil efforts stalled On March 23, 2005, Presidents Bush and Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Martin met at Baylor University in Texas to announce a new Security and Prosperity Partnership for North America. Energy cooperation was front and center in this statement as well, but the truth is that this new initiative, like its 2001 predecessor, has also drawn scant attention. One needs only look at the energy bill just approved by the U.S. Congress, which does little to promote a North American partnership on energy, to confirm that we remain stalled on the effort to enhance regional energy security. While our three governments have announced good plans but have not followed up with enough action, others have been paying attention to North American energy: High oil prices have sparked renewed interest in Canada's energy reserves, especially oil sands. In the last four years, China has invested significantly in Canada's energy market. In April 2005, CNOOC acquired 17 percent of an oil sands company in Alberta. A Canadian pipeline operator plans to develop a $2 billion pipeline with PetroChina International to provide China access to crude oil from Canada's oil sands. In May, Sinopec bought a 40 percent stake in another oil sands project in Alberta. China has previously invested in Canada's coal and natural gas resources. China is not alone. France's TOTAL offered $1.12 billion on August 3 for Deer Creek Energy, a Canadian company with rights to oil sands in Alberta province. The U.S. firm Kinder Morgan announced an Aug. 1 agreement to buy the Canadian firm Terasen to be in a position to transport to market oil recovered from Alberta oil sands. Time to take initiative These acquisitions are signs, if we are smart enough to pay attention to them, that it is time to get interested again in the North American Energy Initiative. Two points to emphasize before we suggest how Canada, Mexico and the United States can get back on the path to energy security: First, the North American Energy Initiative is not "anti-China." It need not conflict with expanding trade or positive relations with China. This is about Canada, Mexico and America doing all we can to produce more energy and use it more efficiently. North Americans have done less than we could have in our own neighborhood. Second, each country will bring to this effort to produce energy security its own laws and culture. Is there a way forward? We think there is. In May 2005, a group of citizens from our three countries issued the report entitled "Building a North American Community." (Two of our co-authors, Andres Rozental and Tom d'Aquino, were vice-chairs.) It calls for a North American resource strategy recognizing that we start from a strong base. Canada is already America's leading supplier of imported natural gas, electricity and oil. Canada's oil sands provide in a world of $60 per barrel oil a viable new source of energy that has catapulted Canada into second place in the world in terms of proved oil reserves. In 2004, Mexico was the second largest exporter of oil to the United States. Both countries offer more secure energy supplies than the Middle East. Here are four things we should do today to encourage increasing private investment and assuring energy security. First, we must dramatically increase the efficiency of our current use of oil. Conservation plus new sources are the strong foundation we need to build. http://www.billingsgazette.com/index.php?id=1&display=rednews/2005/08/14/build/opinion/35-guest-opinion.inc

Note: http://www.billingsgaze...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Tue Aug 16, 2005 10:25 pm
    "This is about Canada, Mexico and America doing all we can to produce more energy..."

    Equals fools paradise. America has thumbed their noses at conservation at every turn. Canada and Mexico are hardly better. So the more we find, the more we will just use thus only making the problem worse now and later.

    Conservation must come before everything. Then we must focus on new forms of renewable energy that are earth friendly. It is our only true way out.

  2. Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:49 pm
    Its the same old "We need private investment so that we can give away our resources at rock bottom prices crap" The idea that Canada should invest in its own energy resources to ensure an east/west distribution to the provinces has obviously never occurred to these anti-Canadians. The only good thing I can see coming from this is that when we don't have enough oil for our own citizens but are legally bound to keep supplying the U.S. through NAFTA, we will be forced to come up with some greener energy alternatives. But I forsee some long, cold winters ahead..

  3. Thu Aug 18, 2005 6:27 am
    NAFTA can be dissolved. We would supply our own needs. The U.S. is already ignoring NAFTA re softwood rulings. There is no point in having NAFTA anymore. What are the cowardly Liberals going to do. Continue to huff and puff at the Americans about getting the duties back while the Americans sit back and laugh. After all of this the Liberals still want to "negotiate" and not retaliate. The Liberals are nothing more than traitors.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news