More Than 1,000 Violations Of Mad-Cow Rules: U.S. Agency

Posted on Tuesday, August 16 at 18:06 by whelan costen
The USDA said Monday it had cited beef slaughterhouses or processing plants 1,036 times for failing to comply with rules on removing those tissues, which are commonly called specified risk materials or SRMs. The violations occurred over 17 months, ending in May. http://www.mytelus.com/news/article.do?pageID=ab_home&articleID=1969612

Note: http://www.mytelus.com/...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:35 am
    mad cow disease in Alberta was a hoax perpetrated by futures traders with the help of the mainstream US press. I cringe when I keep hearing about how Alberta is home to bad beef, this view has been shaped by the best propaganda regime in the world, - the USA government, financial industry and lapdog mainstream media

  2. Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:16 am
    It is interesting how this article plays down the issue though. One case in Alberta and close the border, one case in the U.S. and 1000 violations and no biggy!

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  3. Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:46 am
    I find there may be some parallels between the "mad cow crisis" and GMOs. If I'm not mistaken, the problem originally srose when "scrapie" crossed the species barrier as a result of using animal protein in ruminant feed to speed growth and economise on feed expenses. One would think a lot of people would feel that there was something "unnatural" about basically feeding meat to herbivores. They might have even felt that there could be unpredictable problems down the road. But with the dangling carrot of profit, and in the absence of any science to indicate a problem, feeding animals to animals became common practice. Today we know what happened; cows died, people died, the industry is in trouble, etc. I believe (if there's a cattle farmer out there please correct me) we've been putting animal protein in feed for about 30 or 40 years, and it's only in the last 20 that we saw a problem.

    Is it not possible that in another ten or twenty years, we might find horrible and irreversible effects as a result of growing and consuming at least some of the (now many) GMOs?



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news