The Good Quality

Posted on Wednesday, November 10 at 11:08 by Captain Flynn
I think about all those who went before me and made a country like this. The United Empire Loyalists who would have no part in the American project that came to its fruition on November 2, 2004. Those old Loyalists and their children who defended Canada in 1812 against the onslaught of American values. John A. MacDonald and Georges Etienne Cartier who put together a country that would not practice tyranny, and allow a new people -- the Canadians -- to express themselves in a way that was natural and organic. And so we became the envy of the world.

Laurier settled the west. His Minister of the Interior, Clifford Sifton, told Parliament:

When I speak of quality I have in mind something that is quite different from what is in the mind of the average writer or speaker upon the question of immigration. I think that a stalwart peasant in a sheepskin coat, born on the soil, whose forefathers have been farmers for ten generations, with a stout wife and a half-dozen children, is good quality.

And so as the twentieth century progressed, we Canadians became the good quality. We have a duty, after the election of November 2, to preserve that good quality in the world. It is no accident that after the results of Nov. 2, Americans, in their despair, instinctively looked north. As the Loyalists did before them, as the slaves did before them, as the dissenters of the 60s did -- they all looked north for the good quality.

We can't let them, we can't let the world, down. We must maintain the good quality of Canada. There's going to be an election within a year in our country. I hope we return the good quality to Parliament, and so send a message to the world -- that, no matter what happens to the south, Canadians will always maintain the good quality.

When I woke up in the morning, I woke up in Canada. Everything was bright and the birds were singing. What a blessing my parents gave me.

Link to this article



Note: Link to this article

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by Carley
    Wed Nov 10, 2004 8:11 pm
    I love this country yet I see the values and measeures that made it great slowly being stripped away, by corporate interests and uncaring politicians, that are more concerned with profit then their constituents(sp?)...as a person who's family, like many others, goes back generations to struggling immegrants(like todays immegrants) who wanted nothing more then a piece of land to settle and farm, where they could raise their families in peace, who came to this land to prosper and live freely, I wish for Canada to be that bright shining beacon of hope in the current darkness that all look towards as an example of what freedom and respect for your fellow man means... I love Canada and the ideals that it is supposed to represent... and I believe we can keep this country great if we all try

    ---
    You must be the change you wish to see in the world. - Mahatma Gandhi

  2. Wed Nov 10, 2004 9:14 pm
    Canada, the country where Muslims in Ontario have more freedom from discrimination than white English-speakers in Quebec.

    Go figure.

  3. Wed Nov 10, 2004 9:23 pm
    As an anglophone from Quebec I can tell you Perturbed, you are full of BS. Sure there are some bigoted assholes here, but there are bigoted assholes everywhere. I do not feel oppressed.

  4. Wed Nov 10, 2004 9:35 pm
    I'm talking about laws.

    Quebec's own supremem court has rules that Quebec's laws are illegal, and the federal government lets them get away with it.

    1. Sign laws?

    2. Language police ?

    What is this, Hitler's Germany? I guess anglophones don't ahve the right to their own hospitals, and anglophones don't have the right to drive safely on the highway.


    Welcome to Quebec--the only legalized racist part of Canada. (and no I don't like playing the race card)

  5. Wed Nov 10, 2004 10:46 pm
    I don't understand why you would thank an imaginary being (God) for what humans have accomplished through many generations of hard work and a belief in human effort to improve mankind's lot.

    Bob Allen

  6. Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:02 pm
    Close, very so close Carley.
    But no seegar!
    it is the fiction of nationalisn and colour of law tied in with an international ruling class who take thie homage via the pocketbook.

    Once apon a time there was honour, that was befor this continent got carved up by the HBC, and various other groups with charter(s)

    We elect croocks, we have homelessness, and social ills
    How realy are we different than those we comdem?

  7. Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:22 pm
    Perturbed: did you a have a terrible Mlle Tremblay teaching you French when you were in grade 6??? That would explain a lot!

    Bill 101 was needed to reestablish the majority rights to operate in their own language due to mistakes of the past. I thought you were for this majority right stuff. I would take a bet with you that a majority of Anglophones in Quebec would agree in 2004 that Bill 101 was the right thing to do.

    Do FHQs complain that they do not have "Arręt" on their stop signs? If you are an Anglophone living in Quebec, you should be as bilingual as I am here in BC as a Francophone. It only seems to make sense.

    ---
    "We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"

  8. by Carley
    Thu Nov 11, 2004 12:10 am
    I think the French should be entitled to keeping their heritage, but then I also think that the Natives should keep theirs as well, and I also think Canada should stay together...that is what I think is great about Canada that we're a mosaic... and by the way why does every issue on Vive have to result in talks on separatism or America...I realize these are very pressing issues for some but I believe we have bigger fish to fry at the moment then the huge quagmire of seperatism(not that it isn't a valid issue, so lets not freak out)...Lest we forget this website is called Vive Le CANADA

    ---
    You must be the change you wish to see in the world. - Mahatma Gandhi

  9. Thu Nov 11, 2004 12:28 am
    Mosaic. How artsy of you.

  10. Thu Nov 11, 2004 12:32 am
    1. Bill 101 has been declared ILLEGAL by Quebec's courts.

    2. Quebec is a province in Canada, and Canada's majority language is English. Quebec gets billions from Ontario and Alberta--we should be able to drive safely in Quebec.

    3. I think we all know the reason was to make non-francophones less welcome. French in Quebec was in no way in danger of disappearing, and you know this, rationally.

  11. by Carley
    Thu Nov 11, 2004 12:55 am
    I was making an analogy. Or is analogy too "artsy" as well?
    I was trying to state my comments to the article...please try to remember just because you don't share someone else's viewpoint doesn't necessarily mean it isn't also valid, there is no need for us to belittle one another Perturbed, isn't there already enough people in the world being put down?

    ---
    You must be the change you wish to see in the world. - Mahatma Gandhi

  12. Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:07 am
    1. Sounds highly political. Could someone clarify this?

    2. And Quebec's majority language is French. Simple. Your logic sounds like the flag logic: people just enjoying to irritate each other.

    3. Have you ever lived in Quebec before -or do you know anyone there? Did you ever visit Montreal in the 60s or early 70s? Do you understand what language a new immigrant will pick when there are over 200 millions Englisg speaking people around you (if there are no regulation in place)? Lord Durham tried the hard way and it did not work. The soft way was simply to let demography do its work. 101 was about self-respect, kind like Canadian Sovereingty -vs- US. Can you dig this one better???

    Perturbed: I can ensure you that the more people like you the radical fundamentalist separatists can point to in the ROC, the more they are inclined to separate. You have heard about Bush being a top Al-Qaida recruiter. Well the hardcore separatists just luv people like you. Could you be one hiding under this alias? 'cause you are doing a fine job: I am always such a great federalist but when I see your postings, I go right onside with Samuel and Delenda, in spite of our rather significant differences.

    ---
    "We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"

  13. Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:16 am
    <p> I know its bad form to comment on your own post, but Perturbed is sounding like Stephen Harper. I haven't heard this kind of nonsense from a self-described progressive anglophone since the 1970s. <p> Calling the mosaic "artsy" is snide and disrespectful of fellow posters on this site. The term mosaic has also been used since at least the 1980s to described multicultralism. And I'm not sure why Perturbed brings up transfer payments to Quebec. Because anglophones provide the money, they should call the shots? I thought that "argument" went out with the Quiet Revolution. <p> The only conclusion is Perturbed = Troll. </p><p>---<br>The poster formally known as Action-Jackson <br />
    homepage: http://againstallflags.blogspot.com

  14. Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:29 am
    What can I say? It sounds so sappy.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news