Challenge To Harper

Posted on Monday, March 22 at 18:14 by KevinGagnon

Perhaps the Liberal agenda of Star Wars, privatization and corporate tax cuts is too close to his own to criticize, but in his latest bizarre attack, Harper lashed out at the NDP over one of the rare instances of him agreeing with the party.

In his leadership acceptance speech on Saturday, Harper accused the NDP of wanting to “destroy the system.” Given the NDP’s support for the systems of international law and publicly funded and delivered health care, he could only have been referring to the NDP’s “change the system” campaign on proportional representation.

Funny, because Harper used to support the NDP plan to call a referendum to ask citizens if they would like to change their voting system and use PR instead. When the NDP triggered Parliament’s first vote on PR since 1923 last fall, he joined the Alliance, Bloc, two Liberals and the NDP and voted in favour of the referendum.

Or, perhaps he was referring to the banking system, which, for the record, only needs changing, not destroying. He could explain what he meant by agreeing to debate NDP Leader Jack Layton, something Harper has refused for four days.

Layton challenged Harper to a debate after Harper’s first bizarre attack on Wednesday, in which he said NDP policies were more dangerous than Quebec separation to the future of Canada. Despite criticizing fellow leadership candidate Belinda Stronach for not debating him, Harper refuses to explain why Canadian values will kill the country in a radio or television debate with Layton.

Last year, he ducked about 10 radio or television debates with Layton, all initiated by media outlets, on such issues as the war on Iraq, same-sex marriage and the federal budget.

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by Wildel
    Sat Mar 27, 2004 12:48 pm
    From the very start...


    Harper seems challenged.

  2. Sun Mar 28, 2004 7:32 am
    Harper will not debate Layton, and nor will Martin debate Layton, because Layton is the only one with truth and facts on his side, the other two are doing a tap dance around issues and they both have two left feet...so we won't be hearing a debate, nor will we hear any truth during the election campaigns and since lies are expected we'll get plenty!

  3. Sun Mar 28, 2004 9:43 am
    Whelan Costan,

    Isn't that two RIGHT feet? Or more correctly they have to wrong feet.

  4. Sun Mar 28, 2004 9:45 am
    Actually, I misspoke, it's two wrong bodies!

  5. Fri Apr 09, 2004 8:00 pm
    We have already seen the legitmacy of democracy eroded through voter turnouts in the last number of elections. Voters are understanding that there is no difference who they vote for, they just don't understand why. Everything they don't want happens anyways, so they have become cynical of the entire system. This broken system is apparently the one that Harper is defending. Who needs well informed voters if you're only agenda is to destroy the country and make money doing it?

    A debate between Layton and either Harper or Martin would be a real shock and awe event for Canadians. They would realize in one shot who is really concerned with the issues they care about, and who can really fix them. They would realize that there is not that much difference between the Libs and Cons except timelines.

    For my part I am almost looking forward to seeing Harper elected because an extreme change would be better seen than the slow sneaky process of the liberals. Unfortunately that route would probably mean a great deal of social unrest and possible 'intervention for the forces of democracy' by the states :( Who wants a revolution, but then...who wants nothing.

    ---
    If we are standing still we are moving backwards.

  6. Tue Dec 21, 2004 11:38 pm
    Belinda Stronach should quit the Conservatives and join the NDP. Jack Layton is more facts then Stephen Harper and Stephen Harper should not be trusted.

  7. Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 am
    Debates are just auditions for the role of leader, they make nice television or radio, but they don't really tell us a whole lot. Who cares how well a politician can grandstand during a debate, getting in a good soundbite is a far cry from being able to create good law. Parliament is not even a forum for debate anymore, the Liberals have created a culture where votes are whipped and deals made behind the scenes, the real power is in the PMO and Privy Council.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news