Harper acknowledged that Canadians have not given any one party a majority, and have asked all parties to work together.
Earlier, Liberal Leader Paul Martin announced that he will step down as leader.
The Conservatives are currently elected in 124 ridings, the Liberals are elected in 101 (leading in two others), the Bloc is elected in 50 (leading in one other) and the NDP is elected in 27 (leading in two others). One Independent was elected, in Quebec.
"There will be another chance and there will be another time," Martin told a roomful of supporters in Montreal.
He said he called Harper to congratulate him.
The Conservatives picked up more than 36 per cent of the popular vote, nearly a seven-per-cent increase from 2004. This compared to the Liberals with 30 per cent, the NDP with 17.5 per cent and the Bloc with 10. 5 per cent.
Full story:
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canadavotes2006/national/2006/01/23/mainelecstory060123.html
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on January 24, 2006]
Note: http://www.cbc.ca/story...

I noticed BTW that in his French speach Harper referred to a sovereign Canada but did not do so in English. Odd... Or is it?
---
"We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"
Harper said he would like to see PR and Jack Layton said he would like to see PR .. so lets see how fast they bring that on.
The Harper said if you elect us , we will sue the Liberal Party of Canada and here is a little mention of part ot that promise which was brought up in the Parliament.
The Speaker: The hon. member for Saanich--Gulf Islands.
Mr. Gary Lunn (Saanich—Gulf Islands, CPC): Mr. Speaker, let us talk about the findings of Justice Gomery. This Minister of Public Works has very selective memory. The Kroll audit, part of the Gomery commission, identified $40 million were still missing and unaccounted for. Justice Gomery also stated that because of the cash they could not come up with the exact number. Nobody knows for sure. We do not know the number. The only way to get the real number is to sue the Liberal Party of Canada and let it defend the numbers in court.
If all holds true that parties are so great then these two thing should happen.
---
Good government is not a party government
I don't like the potential reliance on the Bloc at all.
One thing is for sure anyhow, and that is that Canadians do not TRUST any one party with a majority - Thanks be to God.
TT
---
‘The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.’ (Edmund Burke)
Chall I agree with you 100% .
---
Good government is not a party government
Both have said they would like to see proportional representation and legislation that would make and hold “government “ more accountable .Lets see how much power Stephen Harper gives the Auditor General . Lets see if she will get the power required to look into these 9 trust funds that were set up under Paul Martins watch ! Lets hope that the Auditor Generals Office is provided with funding that will give Ms Fraser the room to hire an efficient and creditable staff to insure ever cent is monitored.
Stephen Harper has stated that if elected he will sue the Liberal Party to have them answer to the millions of our tax dollars that are still missing, or was that a bunch of bull? If this governing Conservative Party is going to be any different than the Liberals, he will follow through on those things , because they are a start to accountability.
I never voted in this election or the last one simply because I have no faith in our political system , but I will continue to speak out against this ill system and hope for something that treats all Canadians with respect..
Canadians are not asking for very much, we are told that the “government” are collecting taxes to maintain out public infrastructure and that is where we want them spent. We were never told that they were to be collected to bail out failed business . These business should have had enough insight to retool their industry and made them a better fit for the times and if the auto industry is in big trouble then let them find their way out, we are their consumers , not their bankers too.
If wages are out of control then I am sorry , unions such as the CAW are going to have to learn that for every dollar they increase some ones pay , there will be employees or member of that union who will be sacrificed in the name of that business servings . I am not one to kiss the corporate ass, but shareholder do invest in a business to earn a profit, maybe it would be wise for the auto industry after it restructures to consider their employees as partners or open the door to become shareholders.
But never the less, Canadian are going to have to retool their electoral process, because it is not balance in a way that it servers all Canadian , but yet we are all investor , but we are not receiving equal shares value for the amount of taxes we invest in the country. We are not respected as shareholders and as shareholder we have not seen and accountable accounting practices.
It our money and we deserve to know where every penny is goings, we deserve to know that “our government” is getting the best value for our investment when contracts are awarded and all tenders should be open for the Auditor Generals Department to review.
---
Good government is not a party government
<br />
<a href="http://www.vivelecanada.ca/forum/viewtopic.php?showtopic=14691">http://www.vivelecanada.ca/forum/viewtopic.php?showtopic=14691</a><p>---<br>"Beer Garden'? You mean, a real garden of beer? I thought they only had those in Canada!" --Largo
What the commentators forget, or dismiss, is the simple fact that it isn't Harper who makes his policies, but the big business mind benders who ran his campaign.
The others didn't even come close to their effectiveness, stomping around in the mud. Whenever Harper was away from their influence, he put his foot into his own mouth, as on the question of abortions.
Harper's minority is probably more dangerous, than if he'd received a small majority.
The coming action plan is now obvious. Harper will act sweet as honey and beat his chest as the "Great Canadian". He'll introduce a few motherhood type legislations the others can not afford to oppose.
In between he'll also put forward some minor issues he can afford to lose without losing power. But that will be done with the planned purpose for the record to give him the excuse to claim that his minority position prevents him from him from acting on the country's behalf, crying his eyes out for public support to "make Canada great and independent".
Then, when his handlers feel that the polling numbers are moving in his favour, he'll introduce some major legislation the others can not support and it will be the Conservatives who'll force an election, begging for majority.
As a diehard "deep integrationist free trader" if he gets majority the next time around, the first thing he'll do is to put up signs all around the country "Canada for Sale".
As if Canada hadn't already been sold, with our economy controlled from abroad.
Now....will he follow Mulroney's footstepts to Washington to get his orders, within the next few days, or will his mindbenders advise against it, fearing public disapproval?
In any case, the next year or two will be the rule of PR campaigns by multinational PR hacks to ensure a Harper landslide the next time around.
Ed Deak, Big Lake.
Let's continue the actions to teach people the true message.
---
Good government is not a party government