Universities Should Be Accessible For All

Posted on Tuesday, July 05 at 09:27 by abacus
Since there were no restrictions on who could study what, students were able to enrol in a number of programs and thus complement and enhance their learning experience. Nowadays we hear about "interdisciplinary learning" or "interdisciplinary approaches" all the time, but students in Austria have been "interdisciplinary all along. In fact, when you look at the CVs of these graduates, you will often find that they hold multiple degrees (under the Austrian system you are allowed to take even three majors at a time - if you find the time, that is). I know plenty of people over there who completed, say, their LLB and MBA studies at the same time. Other examples include people who completed both business school and medical school. Today, however, universities are not free anymore. Each student has to pay a nominal amount of about 400 euros (approx. C$600) per semester, but that's still not bad compared to what Canadian universities charge. What matters the most, I believe, is open access. Athabasca University here in Alberta is an open-access university, but every public university should be open access. Just as health care, education is a public good and as such it must be available to every one. To deal with the resulting problem of limited space, I suggest that all universities offer the option of distance and/or online learning. Also, following some European examples, each department could organize "knock-out exams" after the first year or so. If you don't pass, you can't go on and have to select a different major. This would also help to relieve the stress on facilities with limited space and resources. I call on all political parties to consider open-access post-secondary education. Education is a right, not a privilege.

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:49 pm
    Yes,but Canada is sliding backwards.That is all too advanced for a market driven economy.

  2. Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:13 pm
    Education is a privilege, not a right. The handful of people in Canada who meet admittance criteria but still can't manage financially on loans, grants, awards or scholarships should re-establish their priorities if they want an education. If not, too bad - taxpayers shouldn't be forced to comfort them, especially since they'll end up making more money than most taxpayers.

  3. Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:41 pm
    The above poster is so narrowminded (s)he can see through a keyhole with BOTH eyes LOL<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.yesmagazine.org/article.asp?ID=566">http://www.yesmagazine.org/article.asp?ID=566</a> <br />
    <br />
    Finland has gone from being a poor country early in the 20th century to ranking tenth in the world in life expectancy, education, and income.<br />
    The common belief is that a country must first become rich, and then it can provide welfare for its people. The history of the Nordic societies tells a different story; here, wealth has been built by building welfare for people. <br />
    This success was built on a notion of welfare entirely different from welfare as understood in the United States. In the US “being on welfare” is humiliating, and welfare benefits often depend on the recipient’s relationship to something or someone else. What is radically different about the Finnish system is that here welfare benefits and services are rights that everyone living permanently in the country is individually entitled to. Finnish people have economic, social, and political citizenship. <br />
    Despite its poverty, Finland began to create one of the world’s most generous social welfare systems. The aim was to build the economy while eradicating poverty. The aims supported each other: the growing well-being of people provided a healthy and well-trained labor force, and the economic growth was redistributed to people as social benefits<br />
    <br />
    Open poverty and misery are almost nonexistent.<br />
    <p>---<br>Always be tolerant with those who disagree with you. After all, they have a perfect right to their ridiculous opinions-<br />
    unknown<br />
    The more laws that are written

  4. Tue Jul 05, 2005 8:37 pm
    Anyone who thinks education is a privilege doesn`t truly believe in freedom for all! What are the 'privileged' class so afraid of? A little competition? The money is there to have a system as the article suggests. Economic barriers to post-secondary education is also discrimination! Oh, that BAD, BAD, Finland, eh? I`m sure the international corporate fascist capitalists would love to trash that country too!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  5. Tue Jul 05, 2005 8:57 pm
    "The handful of people in Canada who meet admittance criteria but still can't manage financially on loans, grants, awards or scholarships should re-establish their priorities if they want an education."

    It's more than a handful, and they do re-establish their priorities, some to stick around in a low-productivity job they don't like, or which they are under-utilized in. Too bad is for the taxpayer: here's a damn good investment in future revenue and prosperity, especially if the marginal rate can cover the cost of a publicly-provided education anyway.

    The smart money in productivity, prosperity and innovation (thus economic security) is having as well-educated a population as possible. This is easily dampened, however, when such a population is so in debt from getting this education that they cannot invest in new business and/or take risks to the same degree they otherwise might. All those student loan payments could be mortgage payments, pension or other investments.

    The CEO crowd, crying "tax-tax-tax" when asked to explain Canada's lagging productivity are full of crap. Scandinavian countries have higher productivity growth AND higher taxes (not to mention effective tax rates, when compared to the U.S., are not enough to explain the gap).

    Education is indeed not a right, it is an imperative. It's stupidity that's been our privilege.

  6. Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:50 pm
    AHMEN!!!!!

  7. Tue Jul 05, 2005 11:13 pm
    Well said!!

    ---
    Always be tolerant with those who disagree with you. After all, they have a perfect right to their ridiculous opinions-
    unknown
    The more laws that are written

  8. Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:52 pm
    "Education is indeed not a right, it is an imperative. It's stupidity that's been our privilege".

    Truer words, I've never heard!

    We keep circling the toilet bowl, trying to hang on and wondering why we can't get out, making cuts to post secondary education and research and development funding. Try jump starting the econmoy without any tools. It doesn't matter to the few at the top how healthy the economy is, they've ensured they will prosper whatever it's health.

    DL

  9. Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:20 pm
    We've been comparing notes with a retired university professor neighbour a while ago, who was at Cambridge about the same time I was, in the early postwar years. In my case from 1948 to 55. We concluded that our tuition fees were next to nothing.

    The problem is the neoclassical market economy theory now holding the world in a stranglehold, forcibly diverting the benefits of resource conversion into the pockets of a special interest sector. Until this hold is broken there won't be any betterment. When I was living in England at the time, some people were in the "90% tax bracket" and proud of it. Now they don't pay anything and are using the money to further enslave humanity, while human talent is wasted in the gutters. So, what and where are the benefits of this economic theory? Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC.

  10. Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:51 pm
    Toyota is building a car plant here in Canada because our workers are easier to train,which means they are smarter,which means they are better educated,which means Toyota has a highly trained work force,which helps the company grow successfully,which is why they have more money than GM,Ford,DC combined,which means they can use their knowledge base to improve their company and products,which means they will be making profits now and in the future,which means they have secured their future,which means they will hire educated people in the future........
    Now just imagine if ol "W" had gone to school and got hiself e-d-u-c-a-t-e-d.

  11. Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:07 pm
    "So, what and where are the benefits of this economic theory?"

    Exactly where they're supposed to be. All the numbers that matter and confirm the theory are way-way-up, and all the numbers that are not so rosy, or refute the theory (or it's purported social context), by definition don't matter. Economic theory like this is about what you "should" do, which kind of makes it unique from what theory means to hard sciences.

    So, be advised that the laws of gravity have been repealed! All those flying in private jets understand this and see the obvious supporting evidence. Those of you still walking around on the ground, smarten up, you just don't get it!

  12. Wed Jul 06, 2005 7:56 pm
    Yes gravity is no more.Just read the book "The Final Theory" by Mark McCutcheon.We are expanding!Which is why the economic theory works.........I think.

  13. Wed Jul 06, 2005 8:33 pm
    The idea that everyone should be able to go to university ignores the fact that so many are stupid or uninterested.....it should be free for the smart.

  14. Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:00 pm
    The title says "University should be accessible for all". That doesn't mean the same as "able", at least in the non-economic sense.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news