Rice's Ottawa Trip May Turn Into Fool's Errand

Posted on Friday, October 28 at 12:29 by Anonymous
So why is Rice here now and what does she want? Well, mostly she's here now because she didn't come after Paul Martin's government stopped waffling long enough to opt out of continental missile defence. What she wants is more interesting. Along with lower lumber rhetoric and fewer energy threats, Rice is looking for the diplomatic boost that would come with a more visible Canadian commitment to rebuilding Iraq. Almost as an aside Monday, Martin linked what Washington wants to what his government needs. Forecasting his meeting with Rice, the Prime Minister said, "We are going to be discussing several issues including softwood and Iraq." Whoops. Publicly linking a popular Canadian cause to an unpopular U.S. war isn't subtle diplomacy or good politics and it sent a shudder rippling across Official Ottawa. More is now at stake than lumber, oil or even the next federal election. Cohabitation with the colossus next door becomes more difficult for Canada with each new display of U.S. rogue behaviour. Martin certainly isn't hiding Canada's growing discomfort. With an approving electorate watching, his government is asking Rice, and ultimately Bush, for a clear sign that the U.S. will again accept the discipline of international institutions, agreements and law. Nurtured by narrow U.S. domestic political interests, a trade problem has foolishly been allowed to grow into a full-blown, cross-border test of will. Softwood is no longer just about lumber; it's about the fair resolution of differences and, most of all, it's about trust. http://www.embassymag.ca/html/index.php?display=story&full_path=/2005/october/26/travers/

Note: http://www.embassymag.c...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:06 pm
    Canada had years to refute the softwood issue. Why now? NAFTA has always been a political football and Martin is taking a kick at it for his betterment in the next election. Rice is just feeling out the Canadian stand on the foreign issues she has been magnifying. Her report to Bush won't be flattering to Canada and I'm sure they'll have a good laugh about it.

  2. by hoopoe
    Sat Oct 29, 2005 3:26 pm
    What hole have you been hiding in? Canada has been refuting the softwood issue for years. Unfortunately, we stupidly and naively thought that NAFTA rulings had any legal bite; they don't. The US has always understood this and that is why they won't budge and will never give our $5 billion back through negotiations. The solution is to slap an export tax on all energy leaving this country for the US to recoup the money.

  3. Sat Oct 29, 2005 6:00 pm
    What hole have you been hiding in?<<

    Today we see a firm stand against the USA, KINDA! Two weeks ago the wood exporting provinces were discussing raising the stompage fee's to accomodate the Americans DEMAND. Canadians are not discussing a won ruling with the USA but discusing how to win the US over, within Canada. It sounds better the way Martin tells it. Campbell hasn't yet decided how logging corporations can get their wood cheaper in BC to ship back home. He still has a few years befor the next election. The softwood dispute is not about Canadians, it's about logging coporations. Who's hiding in the hole besides me?

  4. by hoopoe
    Sun Oct 30, 2005 3:44 am
    Obviously, I'm talking about the fact we have had a ruling from NAFTA panels in our favor for years. You were implying that Canada all of a sudden just woke up yesterday and noticed that the US stole $5 billion dollars from us, which as per the above is not the case. That's the hole that I was referring to, ie. you didn't seem to be informed. Maybe if you would have read beyond the first sentence of my comment you would have realized that I'm well-aware of all of the points that you raised above. As far as Martin goes, he is playing a fool's game. It wouldn't be so bad if it was just him but as he represents all Canadians he makes the whole nation look like fools before the world. As far as I can see, he (and Harper would be worse), he is a blowhard who is afraid to take any concrete action.

  5. Sun Oct 30, 2005 7:31 am
    >>As far as Martin goes, he is playing a fool's game. It wouldn't be so bad if it was just him but as he represents all Canadians he makes the whole nation look like fools before the world. As far as I can see, he (and Harper would be worse), he is a blowhard who is afraid to take any concrete action.<<

    This is the hole I refer to. Taking a stand after winning the case repeatedly. Why now and not before? The debt grew but should have been paid previously. Martin blows the steam now, because an election is on the menue. What were the rest of us doing after the first vote in our favour? We stood by and waited for our own Government to intervene. Now that they have, shouldn't we be saying "it's bloody well about time".



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news