“Give Me A Lever Long Enough, And I Alone Can Change The World”--Archimedes

Posted on Tuesday, November 27 at 16:06 by Diogenes
2. Make markets work. Tapping into the power of self-interest and the laws of economics is far more effective than appealing to pure altruism. No longer content to rely on traditional notions of charity or to see the private sector as the enemy, great nonprofits find ways to work with markets and help business “do well while doing good.” Habitat mobilizes hundreds of corporate partners in its quest to end poverty housing, from Home Depot, which contributes supplies like lumber and power tools to build sites, to Whirlpool, which promises to put clothes washing machines and dryers in Habitat homes. Beyond garnering in-kind donations, Habitat is changing the way these companies operate by mobilizing teams of corporate volunteers to pick up hammers and join the home-building movement. It has become an effective employee recruitment and retention strategy for corporations, as staff members are motivated and inspired by their corporate-sponsored volunteer efforts. Leading social change groups don’t want simply to apply social Band-Aids, but rather to attack and eliminate the root causes of social ills. 3. Inspire evangelists. Great nonprofits see volunteers as much more than a source of free labor or membership dues. They create meaningful ways to engage individuals in emotional experiences that help them connect to the group’s mission and core values. Habitat for Humanity has aced this practice; its home-building projects are natural ways for its volunteers to perform meaningful, handson work that bear immediate, visible results. These volunteers become so inspired that they spread the word among their circles of friends, church groups, synagogs, corporations, and other networks. It’s a virtuous cycle. 4. Nurture nonprofit networks. Although most nonprofits pay lip service to collaboration, many of them really see other groups as competition for scarce resources. But high-impact organizations help the competition succeed, building networks of nonprofit allies and devoting remarkable time and energy to advancing their larger field. Habitat for Humanity tapped into the worldwide network of religious organizations and nonprofit groups that want to make a difference, establishing affiliates in partnership with existing organizations and building out their programs from there. 5. Master the art of adaptation. Successful social change requires that nonprofits listen, learn, and modify their strategies based on external cues and internal evaluation. Even Habitat, which in the beginning refused to accept government funding and shied away from policy reform, changed its ways over time. When the federal AmeriCorps program presented an opportunity to attract hundreds of thousands more volunteers into the housing movement, Habitat joined the program, accepting government support and significantly expanding its ranks of volunteers. They adapted, and did so because the change allowed them to achieve greater results. 6. Share leadership. Habitat founder and CEO Millard Fuller, and his successor, Jonathan Reckford, ooze charisma. But they also know they must inspire leadership in others if their organization is to become a stronger force for good. They distribute leadership throughout their organization and their networks of religious and nonprofit groups—empowering others to take action. http://changethis.com/40.01.ChangeWay/download [Proofreader’s note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on November 28, 2007]

Note: http://changethis.com/4...

Contributed By


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by MrPrax
    Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:15 am
    <p>Semantics here? <p>Nonprofits are not necessarily dedicated to 'lofty' social goals that eliminate 'poverty' or preach fundamental change, but might simply be advocates (Pro-Life movement), fraternal organizations (Masons) or a number of things like Little League© teams. <p>Now Habitat for Humanity is a nonprofit, but it's not technically making 'social' housing or building housing for 'poor' people -- it's building homes for people that don't qualify for 'traditional' mortgages. Lofty goals aside -- it is just another 'revenue' model for the homeownership market? <p>From their <a href="http://habitat.ca/faqp1.php"> own FAQ</a>: <hr> <p>Who qualifies for a home? <p>The three criteria to qualify for a Habitat home are (1) need for affordable housing, (2) ability to repay a Habitat mortgage and (3) willingness to partner with Habitat. <p>(snip) <p>Who Holds the Mortgages? <p>Mortgages are held by the local Habitat affiliate office until the mortgage is paid off. <hr> <p>Besides simply feeding speculation, and putting aside the fact that their 'enterprise partners' don't generally pay wages that can buy a house, and not mentioning the heavy evangelical flavour of the movement especially down South, I am not really seeing how any of people benefited from these homes are any MORE protected if the economy goes bad and they are out of a job and out of mortgage payments. <p>I'm not dumping on them per se -- they have so far been able to do something that <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Business/IndustryInfo/wireStory?id=3743285"> subprime bandits</a> like CountryWide haven't been able to do (or any of the major banks here) with their revenue model and that is provide a stable lending regime that does provide a certain 'down'class of homeowner with <a href="http://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2006/novdec/features/reckford.html"> home ownership</a>. <p>But I do object to making these guys out as somehow a solution to the very 'for' profit problem of <a href="http://www.wheremostneeded.org/2007/07/habitat-for-hum.html"> capitalist models</a> that always demand that the housing supply be consistently short, so as to provide consistent pressure to the demand and value enhancement of <a href="http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_404187.html"> LAND</a>.

  2. Wed Nov 28, 2007 5:11 pm
    "Make the markets work"........

    You can't make something work that doesn't exist. Except perhaps the deregulated money creation powers of the banks, creating non existing money with perceived power designed to take over, control and kill not only the markets, but all forms of life.

    When a few major powers are permitted to form cartels to decide what is going to be paid to producers, and what people will pay for the stolen resources and products, the whole concept of the markets is gone.

    Which means this whole idea is a non starter. Read what Adam Smith has really said about "self interest" and then compare it with the distorted versions used now to enslave humanity.

    Ed Deak.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news