Iraq Had No Banned Weapons...

Posted on Sunday, January 25 at 18:41 by whelan costen
"I don't think they exist," David Kay said Sunday. "The fact that we found so far the weapons do not exist - we've got to deal with that difference and understand why."

Kay's remarks on National Public Radio reignited criticism from Democrats, who ignored his cautions that the failure to find weapons of mass destruction was "not a political issue."

"It's an issue of the capabilities of one's intelligence service to collect valid, truthful information," Kay said. Asked whether President George W. Bush owed the country an explanation for the gap between his warnings and Kay's findings, Kay said: "I actually think the intelligence community owes the president, rather than the president owing the American people."

Iraq had no banned weapons: outgoing U.S. arms inspector

Note: Iraq had no banned weap...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Mon Jan 26, 2004 11:28 pm
    Well we didn\'t really expect anyone to say that the President owed anything to the people, did we?

    I wonder how many more people will die before the truth in this lie comes out, or is buried?

  2. Tue Jan 27, 2004 12:05 am
    Whelan,

    The truth is always out there. It just gets put in a anti-american category /-: Cause none of these issues are put through the courts, its seen as not real information and just lies and conspiracies.

    Only Mr. Bush can lie and get praised for it from patriotic Americans.

    Kevin Gagnon

  3. Tue Jan 27, 2004 12:09 am
    And Whelan, even if Iraq DID have WMD\'s, they CAN\'T reach the U.S., not even Israel. We KNOW that North Korea has WMD\'s.....Saudi Arablie, Syria, etc. are brutal regimes, and China, India, Pakistan have WMD\'s. I guess they like to pick on beatable, indefensible opponents. Also, we know that WE live right NEXT to THEOR WMD\'S....does that make you feel safe?

    Should a country be allowed to carry a loaded gun in their pocket, just \"Because\"?

  4. Tue Jan 27, 2004 6:20 pm
    Now Rummie and Wolfie are saying that the WMD\'s that didn\'t exist now don\'t exist in Syria. It\'s all perfectly clear now. Two double negative existences make a positive existence.
    We must stamp out this non-existence of WMD\'s now....we must invade Syria to make sure that they continue to not exist. I\'m sure Rummie knows where they aren\'t \"They aren\'t just north of mumble mumble somewhere.\"
    We must stop their Weapons of Mass Destruction related program activity ummm thingies.

    Now that is logic!

  5. Tue Jan 27, 2004 10:20 pm
    >We must stop their Weapons of Mass Destruction related >program activity ummm thingies.
    >

    And do you support the star wars plan. Missle Defence In Space? Just as I would not support any country having WMD, I will not support any kind of military/security plans that would open the door for more war as other countries start to compete military wise and security wise.

    Instead of being a country of example of PEACE, the U.S will be a country that will encourage more war. Peace starts by being an example. The U.S history is far from being an example of PEACE.

    Kevin Gagnon

  6. Wed Jan 28, 2004 8:12 am
    Chretien in his final days, was getting smarter and said to the U.S., when you are the biggest kid on the block, it is not time to show your might, but time to show your wisdom and compassion. Or something equally as brilliant. Sad that he waited all these years to speak so eloquently.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news