Remember This One?

Posted on Friday, June 25 at 10:20 by Just_Society
Demand better. I am. I'm hoping as hell the star spangled tories don't win on monday. If that means holding my nose and voting Liberal, so be it.
Actually, I don't remember it either. And I can't find a reference to it. Instead, I'm hijacking this article with a link about something similar and just as worrisome. If someone can find an actual link supporting the above statements, I will edit it in. --JvH
Mr. Harper also reiterated a number of pledges made in a leaked copy of the party's policy. For example, a Conservative government would elevate the Canadian ambassador to the United States to a cabinet position, give natives the right to buy property on reserves, and pass a law requiring fixed election dates.

Harper agrees to consult first ministers (read down to the senate reform parts)

Note: Harper agrees to consul...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Fri Jun 25, 2004 8:10 pm
    actually I hadn't heard this one? But it isn't that surprising.

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  2. Fri Jun 25, 2004 8:18 pm
    I hadn't heard it either, and I <em>did</em> notice things like Harper's twice slithering off to Faux to apologise for our reluctance to help slaughter Iraqis. <p>I have to say I <em>won't</em> believe this story without something like a usable citation.

  3. Fri Jun 25, 2004 9:39 pm
    Perhaps it would be better (if either Harper or Martin wins some sort of majority) to create a place in the US cabinet for the Prime Minister..........his new title would be called "Governor of the Outer Territories" (or outer limits).

  4. Fri Jun 25, 2004 11:14 pm
    Sorry. Harper's idea was to appoint the Canadian ambassador to the US to Cabinet. My misktake.

  5. Sat Jun 26, 2004 12:39 am
    While that's what he said (for now), it may well turn out that the way you first stated it will come true.......

  6. by JimmyD
    Sat Jun 26, 2004 3:26 pm
    Regardless, the Americans would never think of doing it and Canada and Canadians should not even consider even thinking of doing such a stupid thing.

  7. Sat Jun 26, 2004 6:20 pm
    Not Canadians! But the politicians now..............

  8. Sun Jun 27, 2004 3:50 am
    Appointing our Ambassador to the United States, the country we sell 80% of our goods to, is a good idea. Wether people like it or not, the American market is our bread and butter.
    Consulting the Provincial Premiers is another good idea, the Liberals almost lost the country in 1995. More Federal-Provincial dialogue with respect to issues that are divisive is a good thing.

  9. Sun Jun 27, 2004 3:06 pm
    I don't like having unelected in cabinet, and MPs
    generally don't get made ambassadors.

    And I think we have to get over this notion of them being
    our bread and butter - they need us more than we need them
    if their trade deficit is anything to go by. (Back when
    TIME ran its cover "would anyone notice if Canada
    disappeared?" I thought there's a real quick way to find
    out. Cut off the oil, cut off the water, cut off the
    natural gas, cut off the electricity, cut off the lumber,
    blow up the Alaska pipeline, block the Alaska highway and
    the St Lawrence, bar their planes from landing, confiscate
    their military bases, etc etc.) We do a lot of north-south
    international but only because we don't trade east-west
    domestically nearly as much as we ought. This
    bread-and-butter story is just an annexationist psyop.

    (Could someone repair the lead again? "Canadian ambassador
    to the US ambassador" is just silly.)

  10. Sun Jun 27, 2004 5:06 pm
    Anon,

    Wish you'd separate yourself from all the other Anons. That post deserves it.

  11. Sun Jun 27, 2004 7:23 pm
    sorry, Either konqi barfed my old login cookie or vive
    outtimed it.

  12. Sun Jun 27, 2004 7:28 pm
    Like I told Bill O'Really when he screamed for a boycott of Canada... If you start with the gunning computers of the Abrams tanks, please do. =p

  13. Tue Jul 13, 2004 8:42 pm
    yeah like you guys invented that piece of technology! A Canadian corporation, for one reason or another, is under contract by an American Corporation just to build the thing.
    Just like G.M., Ford, Chrysler etc.


    Mike

  14. Tue Jul 13, 2004 9:10 pm
    What's your point, Mike ??


    ---
    "Arrogance in Politics is unacceptable"
    Jim Callaghan
    Minden, Ontario
    705-286-1860
    www.misterc.ca



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news