Broadbent Outraged By Martin’S Abuse Of Power

Posted on Sunday, March 07 at 18:42 by Anonymous
It is totally unacceptable to deny democratic rights to the residents of Ottawa Centre because the Prime Minister is afraid the Liberals will lose the seat.

It is also the ultimate in hypocrisy for a Prime Minister to say he wants to reduce Canada's democratic deficit, while denying the basic democratic right to have an elected member to 114,000 Canadians for over 14 months."

Ed will be holding a Press Conference on this subject tomorrow morning. For more information – check the web site tomorrow. www.edbroadbent.ca

Note: www.edbroadbent.ca

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Mon Mar 08, 2004 11:51 pm
    I hope he brings up Martin's constant line of addressing western issues, while ignoring the new Parlament seats that died on the books when Cretin dissolved parlament. Proportional representation for the West!!!<p> <p>---<br>"History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme" Mark Twain <br />
    "The greatest price of not participating in politics is being governed by your inferiors." Plato

  2. Tue Mar 09, 2004 12:03 am
    As much as I am loathe to defend Martin, I must point out that the riding redistribution bill is in process of being passed. It is in fact the conservatives who delayed its swift adoption in the Senate before Parliament was dissolved.

  3. Tue Mar 09, 2004 12:16 am
    What's interesting to note is how Ed Broadbent's actually supported FTA during the last few days before the deadline that was set. Even though he was clearly opposed to the FTA. Instead of the NDP and Liberals coming together to stop the FTA as it seemed they would have done. The NDP changed from being opposition to FTA to supporters of FTA.

    Turns out the Union helped change the NDP support for the FTA after he was clearly oppose to it. Not sure the complete details. I'm going to look more into this.

    Its becoming more clear to me now that the NDP needs to do some changes with their connections with the Union as proposed by CAP when they had proposed to merge.

    With that said I will still feel forced to vote NDP. Unless the Progressive Canadian Party becomes a actual political party in the upcoming election. Or if Stevens and Orchard get the real Progressive Conservative party back.

    Kevin Gagnon

  4. Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:14 am
    A good way to get some answers to your questions, would be start a discussion on the rabble.ca discussion forum:
    http://www.rabble.ca/babble

    There's lots of people who are very knowledgeable about NDP history who could clear up how that went down.

    As of Jan. 1, the NDP's relationship with unions is fundamentally different, since unions can't give any money to the party because of changes to electoral law. Since they don't have any more financial leverage, the party is much more independent, as you suggest it should be.

  5. Wed Mar 10, 2004 4:01 pm
    Many in Canada on the outset of the announcement of the FTA deal were rather quiet about the whole thing. Most of the NDP were in that catagory until details were released of the deal. the NDP under pressure by many different groups joined the fight - and earned their most seats for it.

    The Liberals at the time ALSO fought the FTA. Once in power though...



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news