In 1930, the Rivers and Harbors Act was enacted following a disastrous 1927 flooding of the Mississippi River. The notion that government could take preventative measures and act to lessen the effects of tropical storms was born. Despite that foresight, a devastating hurricane rolled over Florida in 1935, the so-called Great Labor Day Hurricane, leaving hundreds dead. Nevertheless, that failure did nothing to dampen a growing expectation amongst the people of the United States that public officials should be actively involved in disaster avoidance and relief.
In fact, however, those expectations didn’t result in fully institutionalized relief measures until the 1970s. It is a safe bet that most Americans have no idea when government officials decided to throw in the towel and rely on a hope and a prayer that they could dodge the inevitable storms forever. But they are surely learning at the end of summer 2005 that their government is feeble, inept, unable to cope with a large-scale catastrophe … and that much of this failure results from lack of planning or deliberate decisions to forgo planning.
Some critics are decrying the lack of National Guardsmen in the New Orleans area. They note that most of the available troops and the equipment needed to deal with Katarina are off on an adventure in Iraq. And those remarks are true: American resources, despite the enormous wealth of the country, are presently stretched very thin and the needed men and equipment, in large enough numbers, are elsewhere occupied. But it is also coming to light that officials in the New Orleans area have been trying for years to get the levees fortified, the pumps upgraded, the evacuation planning rethought … only to have the federal government not only fail to come up with funding, but to deliberately reduce the funds already available.
As the man currently in charge, President Bush will bear a lot of the blame for what has happened here. He didn’t cause the hurricane, he couldn’t have diverted it elsewhere. But he didn’t need to divert the emergency response people in the Delta area to a foreign adventure in Asia. He didn’t need to claw back funding for structural improvements in New Orleans and around the Mississippi levees. But he did, and for this he deserves condemnation. In fact, he cut $71.2 million from the New Orleans Corps of Engineers so that plans to fortify levees and upgrade the water pumping system had to be shelved. But successive presidents have also failed to heed the warnings about the peril New Orleans would face when that inevitable category four or five storm hit head-on. And all of those former presidents deserve condemnation for their negligence as well.
Bush had the audacity to take to the airwaves and proclaim that no one could have foreseen this tragedy even though he knew full well that such an event had been predicted for years. Worse, the White House politely refused all foreign offers of assistance, including from Canada, which the cynical among us believe is meant to signal that the usual suspect corporations in the US will make money out of the reconstruction … can’t have any of that potential profit upset by some do-gooder country trying to provide free assistance, just because it’s the right thing to do.
But what has really struck a sour note with Americans and astounded the rest of the world, is the ineptness of the response to this disaster. This is the same nation that is very often able to mobilize quickly to provide assistance to other countries in the aftermath of some catastrophic event. Apparently, they’re a little like the carpenter who builds everyone else’s houses but never seems to be able to finish his own.
When a massive tsunami struck the coast of Aceh in Indonesia last December, the carnage was unthinkable. However, this allegedly third-world nation managed to mobilize its troops, emergency and medical workers in the blink of an eye. To be sure, there was a great outpouring of help from much of the world; but the Indonesians were prepared to respond almost immediately. India also managed to act and react with speed.
The American government was lethargic in its reaction to this crisis although the Red Cross was on its way to the hurricane zone before the wind even stopped blowing.
It is not lost on anyone that the bastion of free enterprise is apparently ill-equipped to deal with its own emergencies. Writing for ZNet, Michael Parenti noted: “When an especially powerful hurricane hit [Cuba] last year, the Castro government, abetted by neighborhood citizen committees and local Communist party cadres, evacuated 1.3 million people, more than 10 percent of the country's population, with not a single life lost, a heartening feat that went largely unmentioned in the U.S. press.” The American press today is hardly able to contain its derision of the Bush administration’s response.
Parenti goes on to note that a great deal of the problem can be traced directly to America’s lack of social planning. The free market will take care of everything important, to the profit of corporations; the unfortunate should rely on private charity. That thinking has permeated political levels in America to an unprecedented degree so that any form of assistance to people is denied because it doesn’t serve the interests of the market. The poor are on their own in the American system which can only be described as ‘free enterprise for the poor, socialism for the rich’. [It is worth noting that in the midst of all the devastation in the Delta region, Congress is making sure to set aside time on September 6 to pass another tax rebate for the wealthy.]
Even the American news networks who have generally given George Bush a pass on virtually every inane thing he has said or done since 2000 are criticizing the pathetic rescue efforts. And it is not lost on many that the folks still in New Orleans after the rain stopped falling were largely poor and black. One can’t help but wonder if the response would have been swifter had the damage occurred to some tony upscale white neighbourhood.
There are things that can be done to mitigate the potential damage from hurricanes, but they all cost money. Hurricane shutters can be installed, laminated glass can withstand high winds, roof bracing can be installed, side walls can be bolted to foundations … but year after year we see television images of frantic southerners heading off to their local Home Depot to buy all the plywood they can carry. A little planning would go a long way toward making life more tolerable in the high-risk hurricane zones. But what is really needed is the long arm and deep pockets of government to help. In the land of the free, the government is not going to interfere with the right of anyone to be ruined or killed by bad weather; it’s their own fault that they weren’t rich enough to take suitable precautions.
As Paul says the US refused our intial offer for help because they likely want their Halliburton rebuilders doing all the work and I think this is the reason that they also go running to "aid" other nations in their disaster relief efforts. Although, Canadian corporations are doing exactly the same kind of lobbying, don't think they're not. Why do you think there is this space of "dead" silence while people die? If you listen hard enough you can hear all the phone calls being made and the money changing hands, and then finally four days later the supplies start rolling in. The system is set up for profit making not life support.
In a disaster, give me Castro any day.
---
"And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche
If you didn't listen to Air America, you got minimal information. After 2 days of coverage, it was still coming across as if possibly 80 or so people had died.
Now on TV this morning, several of the networks are attempting to paint the picture that things are going steadily well and that perhaps many would have been saved if they hadn't purposefully avoided being rescued.
Excuse me while I puke.
I was raised to a sheer anger level when it finally hit me on Wednesday that the pictures of the area showed no boats or real rescue in progress.
Had the REAL shocking truth been let out immediately, ie, they were literally stuck there in high water (over their heads, duh) and had no boats, life rafts, buses etc to get out of the area, perhaps their would have been brought forth the obvious conclusion that floatation devices of one form or another had to be supplied pronto in mass quantities.
The other impact of the lack of truth out was the negative snowball effect it had in getting people so confused and lacking hope of rescue (probably exponentially rising after day 1) that they perhaps became dysfunctional in their thinking. This further complicated the already poor rescue attempts.
What was required was actually very simple:
1. Truth of the actual predicament that they were in regarding being "stranded at sea". This obvious neglected truth is the most grim element of what you are speaking about.
2. Helicopters, etc which would have broadcast that boats, life rafts, tubes, etc were on their way WITHIN HOURS OR THE NEXT DAY and for everyone to be prepared to be evacuated in this high water. This national level attention to COMPLETE evacuation was required.
3. A mobilization of 1000s of boats, rafts or floatation devices akin to rescuing a mass quantity of people who were effectively stranded out at sea.
Hundreds of small boat owners were being brought to New Orleans by the New Orleans police department. This wasnt a disorganized bunch of yahoos looking to goof around, this was an organized local disaster group led by city officals. FEMA turned them away.
When you actually look at everything FEMA did to ENSURE that no relief made it through to help people, you can only assume FEMAs role was to kill as many people as possible.
The single most telling event was FEMA cutting the phone lines of the State Emergency Command Centre. As an ex-military person myself I have had lots and lots of training in dealing with emergencies. The *FIRST PRIORITY* is to establish communications, not DESTROY communications.
FEMA cannot even claim they cut the wrong phone lines by accident as cutting ANY communications is completely wrong in an emergency.
However, when you are attacking an enemy, the two most important goals are
1) Cut communications to disable command and control
2) Cut supply lines, keep the enemy from being supplied, make them starve or die of thirst. Stop medical aid from helping the injured and sick, let them die.
FEMA was not there to render aid to New Orleans, they were there to lay siege to the city.
evacuees to the Texas city, Barbara Bush said: "Almost<br />
everyone I’ve talked to says we're going to move to<br />
Houston."<br />
<br />
Then she added: "What I’m hearing which is sort of<br />
scary is they all want to stay in Texas. Everyone is<br />
so overwhelmed by the hospitality.<br />
<br />
"And so many of the people in the arena here, you<br />
know, were underprivileged anyway, so this--this (she<br />
chuckles slightly) is working very well for them." <br />
<a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001054719">http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001054719</a><br />
<br />
This is what the white upper crust Christian bottom feeders of Texas feel about their fellow Americans. This Bush family is really something else aren't they? How much of this Bush family are the citizens of the USA willing to take? <p>---<br>Good government is not a party government
The road to the truth could take years and become as mirky and polluted as the waters which lay claim to over 10,000 dead.
But there is one thing I know is true. Our national government did not respond. It's almost as if there was no government at all.
Just to try and take my mind off things I watched F/911 this weekend. It really brings into perspective what we're dealing with.
requested from Canada was medicine. Just one year ago he was telling Americans not to buy these same medicines because they were 'dangerous'. I not sure Bush can spell the word irony though.(I was listening to Air America yesterday and they said Bush would respond by declaring a "War on Tropical Storms".
Wouldn't surprise me.)
That doesn't mean that there are not some within the upper levels of FEMA who may have intentionally dragged their feet but if you cast your minds back, they weren't particularly effective in New York and Washington four years ago either. Most of the rescue work fell to local emergency crews.
Paul Harris
What is absolutely incredulous is Bush's refusal to allow certain countries to help out. If anyone knows the names and how to contact key people, I would like to ask their help and assistance in supporting our newly formed civil rights organization, Lakota Wawokiya Civil Rights Org, in which we go in and do battle with lawyers, judges, prosecutors, States Attorneys, and now even the Governor, in an attempt to keep innocent Lakotas from being sent off. Since it is no longer fashionable to slaughter Indians, White America is now using the criminal justice system to eliminate Native Americans. This is what I call a man-made disaster. There are literally hundreds of innocent, confused Indians sitting Americas prisons along side Leonard Peltier and Arlo Looking Cloud.
If you could send me the country and contact info, I would like to ask for their assistance. Thank you for your help.
not true, in fact FEMA has become another excuse to steal land from those private property owners for land developers who want the land for future casinos in the Gulf area....it is well documented and there is proof that FEMA knew about all this and let the distruction happen to this degree intentionally with the help of the White House ......research and you will see the truth.......FEMA is and was never for the people of the US, but for a small group to profit from, ....and this is fact, research
Political parties tend to do that very well, they roll the dice with the publics infrastructure dollars, knowing full well that they are draining our coffers and this is why political parties have turned into the modern mafia of this century.
We must stop funding them with our time, our money and more important our VOTES. Political parties here in Canada and the United States are legalized legislated crooks.
Compliments of the day to you
Wayne Coady
Dartmouth
Nova Scotia Canada
---
Good government is not a party government