However, the public and press are starting to ask "how would it work?" The answer has to be "there are several models, here's a couple, with alternatives."
So if that interests you, you may find this site, still under construction, worth a look:
http://www.wilfreddaylawoffice.com/page1.htm
And you can help by sending comments to:
dayphope@on.aibn.com
Comments
view comments in forum
You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.
The fact that many Canadians don't know the first thing about PR is probably the most important thing to attack.
If a referendum were held today, polls show that the voters would be split almost 50/50 on the issue.
Your site is well done and easy to understand. I would like your opinion on how ridings work.
Would it not be better if ridings had roughly the same amount of voters, so the riding size wouldn't influence the outcome ?
I have read that in order for the NDP to get one seat they need some 111,000 votes, but for the Bloc to get one seat they need far fewer votes, as with the Libs and Cons.
Any comments on that ?
---
"Arrogance in Politics is unacceptable"
Jim Callaghan
Minden, Ontario
705-286-1860
www.misterc.ca
The overall object of electoral change is to get more voters out. Had those 40% of Canadians who did not vote, voted, the chances are Parliament would have a vastly different composition than it now does, whether under FPTP or PR.
In a nutshell, appealing to Canadians' sense of duty or pride, has been the traditional approach, and it is not working. But "bribes" just might.
---
RickW
Also, they need to know the issues, and simply by enticing voters to cast a ballot for any other reason is asking for trouble.
Voters do not take enough time to look into all the issues before they vote, and that is something we cannot force them to do.
By all means, it would be nice if more people took the time to vote, but intelligently.
You can't legislate that.
---
"Arrogance in Politics is unacceptable"
Jim Callaghan
Minden, Ontario
705-286-1860
www.misterc.ca