U.S. Lawmakers Continue To Perpetuate 9/11 Myth

Posted on Tuesday, October 17 at 09:01 by jensonj
''Although proponents of the fence on the U.S.-Mexico border have stated that it is necessary to preserve national security, they have not called for a similar structure along the United States border with Canada,'' states the county's resolution passed at a meeting last Tuesday, ''despite the fact several terrorist groups have made or attempted entry through the Canadian border, including some of the Sept. 11, 2001, attackers.'' In the initial aftermath of 9/11, there was unsubstantiated speculation that some of the 19 suicide bombers had crossed into the U.S. from Canada. Debunking that myth has become a full-time job for Canadian diplomats south of border since then, as members of Congress and cable news pundits have periodically revived it. Canada's former ambassador, Frank McKenna, took to the American airwaves to combat the myth directly. http://www.canada.com/topics/news/world/story.html?id=9f450d61-2d5f-4354-a333-62a81f7db080&k=62034

Note: http://www.canada.com/t...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by chall
    Tue Oct 17, 2006 9:52 pm
    Yeah, perpetuating the myth that 19 Arab hijackers managed to not only defeat the worlds most technologically advanced defence system, but suspend the laws of physics as well.

  2. Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:27 pm
    What would it matter if the Americans enclosed themselves within their own country? Obviously Mexico and Canada would be a lot safer.The "Iron Curtain" provided the USSR with the containment required and the USSR monitered traffic going both ways. Mexicans and Canadians have standards as well. Rather then fight the Americans on an issue they refuse to drop, Canada should set the standards. Their own border security (USA) could check out any American leaving that country before passing them on to Canadian security. The terrorists in the USA originated there and some actualy Americans themselves. Canadian troops should be brought back to defend our country and insure undesirable Americans cannot enter Canada. This would also save the taxpayer the cost of sending troops overseas and the price of arming our Customs & Immigration personal. Why should our troops be aiding and abetting a country who dosen't trust them. The "friendly fire" wasn't all that friendly.

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  3. by Wraun
    Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:06 am
    It doesn't matter what who says, when, where or to whom. There will always be the ignorant. It gets to me when I hear statements like that but, oh well, I guess it's something we're just going to have to live with and maybe we can find a way to use it to our advantage.

    ---
    Everybody got to deviate from the norm

  4. by avatar Jacob
    Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:58 pm
    If Frank McKenna had been in the south of Texas, they might perhaps have listened to him, and understood, and remembered - assuming that they would catch his accent.

    But maybe these things are all too much to expect from Bushland.

  5. Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:40 am
    I guess it's something we're just going to have to live with and maybe we can find a way to use it to our advantage:

    It's the Americans turf. If they don't want anyone else in or their own out, I don't begrudge them. They have the terrorists in Washinton and I would just as soon keep them away from us. The USA is becoming more like the USSR every day. People who enterd the USSR knew the differances from the free societies and behaved themselves accordingly. If you MUST go to the USA, then be prepared for the totaly different enviroment. The "Open Border" dissolved at the very day of 911. Americans blame Canada for their own border protection and refuse to accept that the problem originated within their borders. With the "Wall" they can no longer blame anyone else. That is, unless Canadian/Mexican contractors erected the wall(s).

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  6. by Wraun
    Thu Oct 19, 2006 1:05 am
    Ya you're right! My remark about using it to our advantage was to imply that if they want to believe that terrorists come from Canada, let 'em. Fear of "Canadian terrorists" is not compatible with an NAU or allowing "free movement of people across borders".
    Furthermore, prior to the requirements of a passport or "secure border crossing documents", the process of security at the international border lies with the country that is being entered. To blame Canada for a lapse in American border security is also maddening to me because no one gets inspected or interrogated by a Canadian official before leaving Canada. If Ahmed Rassam had made it to his destination and completed his mission, it would not have been the fault of Canadian security. Immigration laws? That's debatable too. Homegrown terrorist from Canada? That's the fault of US atrocities in the Middle East. So no matter which way you slice it. It ain't our fault!

    ---
    Everybody got to deviate from the norm

  7. Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:05 pm
    Really, what do you expect from a bunch of ignorant rednecks who wolf down any garbage that is thrown their way by their government and media? In the final analysis, who gives a rats ass what they think?



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news