Our Heritage Minister launched a full-front attack against Mr. Harper, claiming that without the CRTC we would have never created such big stars as Céline Dion or Shania Twain.
I believe that this claim is bogus; it does not reflect the reality of Canadian culture. Shania got her start in Nashville, and Céline is a major international star, who could easily do without the Canadian market (she actually jumped to fame when she appeared in the Eurovision Song Contest, representing Switzerland of all things!).
One criticism also revolved around the fact that Canadian TV would have more American content and that we would not see Canadian stories told on TV. In what way would that differ from the situation that we have had for years?
Apart from very few Canadian productions, Canadian TV networks fill their schedules with American fare. It is only now, finally, that we are beginning to see more Canadian, and better, productions (Eleventh Hour, Train 48, Corner Gas, etc.).
My hope has always been that we could have a TV system like the one they have in the UK. How come the British can have so many domestic productions, when Canadian producers always have to go and beg for money? This cannot be right, something must be wrong.
The problem is that most Canadian producers try to do something “artsy-fartsy”: they think, I believe, that this is the only way to make a Canadian film or show. Corner Gas has finally proved to all of us that “artsy-fartsy” is not the way to go. For the first time in a very long time (or ever?), a Canadian show is regularly among the top 15 shows in Canadian TV ratings.
And what about our broadcasters? In fact, they are not broadcasters, but “simulcasters”. Simulcasting US shows is not the way to go, for a number of reasons:
1. Most Canadians have access to US networks and actually prefer watching US shows on US channels (because Canadian broadcasters are unreliable: they show one episode one week, pre-empt it the next few weeks and then pick it up again, showing the same episode as the originating US network, effectively leaving out a bunch of episodes that Canadians can only see if they turn to the originating US network. Is it really that hard to just show all the episodes in the proper sequence, as they do in England? Jeez!).
2. Canadian broadcasters are very unreliable (see above).
3. Now that many Canadians have access to digital “time-shifting” channels, they can watch American TV without the “simulcast problems” (the signals of time-shifting channels are not replaced by the signals of Canadian simulcasters).
The CRTC has been absolutely inactive and ineffective in ensuring a stronger Canadian TV industry. So, if the CRTC were to be weakened, or even abolished, who would notice?
Comments
view comments in forum
You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.
---
"These Yankee politicians are the lowest race of thieves in existence." - Sir John Sparrow Thompson
If you want to hold on to the organization (or the health care system as you posted on that thread) solely because that's the Canada you've known all your life, then you need to carefully think about what you're saying and whether or not you are limiting yourself.
For example, someone could've made a strong statement and fought till his death to keep cassette tapes from replacing records because "that's the way it's always been". If that guy had his way, he'd limit society.
I personally think CRTC has had it's time and doesn't have the flexibility to change to support the nation's demands. In other words, it would cost way too much to try to tweak it....it's better to outright replace it.
Here's a possible scenario:
CBC Newsworld should be given an off-air frequency and turned into CBC2, with CBC becoming CBC1.
CTV could function as our version of ITV, with Global and CHUM serving as our Channel 4 and Channel 5.
In addition, I would remove US networks from basic cable and move them to a higher tier. This way, our networks would have a sounder basis, and simulcasting would be a thing of the past, thus giving Canadian networks more independence in terms of programming and scheduling.
Canadian content should be promoted and enforced, again along the lines of policies in place in Britain.
Under such a system, Canadian shows would have a larger audience (with the basic US networks shifted to a higher tier and given the fact that most Canadians subscribe to basic tier and tier 1 only), making this whole undertaking generally more profitable (and generating more funds for future Canadian productions).
And, finally, I think that our cable companies should replace CNN with CNN International, which would make more sense.
And yes, those simulcast CanCon excuses for networks are simply dreadful. God bless the CBC, they are truly Canadian, they make no excuses for being Canadian and people tune into it to indulge in unadulterated Canadian content.