"The theme of this year's conference is very timely," said David Bercuson, CDFAI's Director of Programs. "Prime Minister Harper has stated that Canada is an energy superpower. We wanted to examine this idea and what it may mean for Canada. Canadians are very aware of their nation's prominence in the international energy community, and the impact that decisions made here at home have on the world's energy supply."
The CDFAI poll also showed that amongst decided voters the Conservatives (37%) enjoy a healthy 10 point lead over the Liberals (27%). The NDP were at 15% followed by the Bloc and Green parties at 9% each.
Other results showed that Canadians are supportive of the energy superpower concept (57%), but remain divided over what to do with that energy wealth.
In addition to the poll, participants at CDFAI annual conference were presented with a paper commissioned by the Institute prepared by Annette Hester examining the notion of Canada as an "Energy Superpower" available at. http://www.cdfai.org/
The CDFAI poll was a national online poll conducted by Innovative to explore the issues surrounding the theme of the annual conference. The poll is available at http://www.cdfai.org/
The survey focuses on the following areas:
1. Canada as an Emerging Superpower
2. The Kyoto Accord
3. Canada's Energy Wealth
4. Critical Infrastructure Protection
5. Canada/U.S. Relations
6. The Arctic
....
http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release.do?id=787225
& here's the survey. The stuff about Harper, Layton etc is on p.40 but there's a bunch of other good stuff:
http://www.cdfai.org/PDF/CDFAI2007Poll.pdf
Note: http://www.cdfai.org/
http://www.cdfai.org/
http://www.marketwire.c...
http://www.cdfai.org/PD...

---
Everybody got to deviate from the norm
Arctic as Artic. As in all quantitative research, the thing to look for is the bias
in the question, not the so-called accuracy (Within 2.9% 99 times out of 100.)
The Kyoto questions are classic examples of questions biased to produce a
satisfactory answer for the poll sponsors. I have spent 42 years having every
word I've written put through qualitititive and quantitative research
methodologies and have a healthy respect for the ease of manipulation that
biasing brings the less scrupulous among us. In my view the online aspect
increases this potential. Very sketchy. Sort of like Pythagoras in bed with
Nostradamus.