The plant breeder develops cultivars to meet both sets of needs and, what is not well recognised is that, the final consumer benefits from improvements in both agronomic and quality characteristics.
Meeting the needs of the farmer results in a stable supply of consistently high quality product –stability in production for citizens in the developed world means a stable and affordable price. In lesser developed countries, meeting the agronomic needs may mean the difference between a harvest and no harvest at all. It is evident that meeting farmers’ agronomic needs benefits all humankind.
Stable production also benefits food processors, and it is here that the second type of need is met. Processors and users demand all sorts of quality characteristics from crop plants, dependent on their end product. Healthier oils, increased levels of vitamins, proteins and amino acids are examples. While these primarily benefit consumers in the developed world, some, such as increased levels of essential vitamins and other nutrients, also benefit those in the developing world.
http://www.europabio.org/documents/140404/ne_140404_benefits.htm
Note: http://www.europabio.or...

---
When you are up to your ass in alligators it is difficult to remember that the initial objective was to drain the swamp
Perhaps GM crops are benign and won't hurt us. Perhaps they'll mutate the cane toad to be the dominant species on the planet. But I know one thing - don't F with Ma Nature, cause she always wins.
---
"I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden
Increase profits and monoplies. Farmers in our wheat producing provinces, substain heavy fines, if monopolized Granola is blow onto their fields and they don't remove all of it.
---
"And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche