If that is what it means, then I cannot support our troops. I cannot wish them well if their purpose is conquer other people, and plunder the wealth of other countries that have done us no harm. That would require me to endorse crimes against humanity conducted under the guise of national security and patriotism. I cannot do that—I will not. It is simply wrong.
Neither should we, as we so often do, confuse supporting our troops with supporting the president, or wrongful and immoral policies of corrupt government. The president and his ilk do not support our troops or he would not use them as pawns; he would take care of them when they come home broken and torn with psychic scars. He does not care about them—they are only a means to an end.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article14815.htm
Note: http://www.informationc...
The problem I have with folks bringing up the Canadian defence against the "nazi scourge" is that as a parallel to todays conflicts arising out of 911, it doesn't fit. The type of fascism we faught aginst is unfortunatly the side we have chosen to march along side this time. Simply, I don't see our soldiers fighting on the side of right this time, however good the intention of our troops are. "cut and run" are George Bush's words, just as Afghanistan is Bush's war for reasons far removed from simply saving the Afghani people. Your sisters heart and courage may be in the right place but I firmly believe our troops are in the wrong place, for the wrong reasons.
I suppose we could just let the religious lunatic Taliban take over again to beat their women and plot against the West they so passionately hate. They can grow their poppies to supply our addicts, and they can be left to give refuge to any and all terrorists who want to exterminate the infidels (that's you and me,friend).
I'll take a couch jumping, red string wearing, rosary toting, bible thumping westerner any day over that lot. Oh, and don't forget, they want to annihilate the Jews too....sounds like something the nazis wanted to do...hmmmm.
By the way,it's very offensive to me that anyone would compare our troops to nazis or fascists
I suppose it didn't even occur to you that your(not mine) friends in the northern alliance are the narcotics suppliers. Or that you and your valiant sister are good automatons for Harper who would have GLADLY went to Iraq.
How many have died in Afganistan because of us. I don't mean just our troops but theirs and their families. You claim to have feelings for the people living under the Taliban but you don't. Better dead than red is the redneck way of thinking. But go back to your church and pray for the Taliban abused children but your sister probably already murdered them.
I hear you me too.
"It seems to me that 99% of those opposed to our troops being in Afghanistan are against it because it's "George Bush's war" or the "US's war"."
And that would be a problem because....?
"It's a free country last time I checked and "cut and run" can be used by anyone"
It is, so sorry, use it as you will.
"I suppose we could just let the religious lunatic Taliban take over again to beat their women"
Yes and Afghanistan was invaded by the US for 911, not to save women from the Taliban. You remember the manhunt for Osama, that according to Bush isn't important anymore. Yes the reasons to be there just keep changing. Why is that?
"and plot against the West they so passionately hate. They can grow their poppies to supply our addicts, and they can be left to give refuge to any and all terrorists who want to exterminate the infidels (that's you and me,friend)."
You know if you want to buy into any boogeyman manufactured and then spoonfed to you by the MSM do so. WMD was such a boogyman so we were assured by the US administration, US and British intelligence, and the MSM. Iraq was invaed, sacked, and is still currently occupied even though we know the WMD story was bogus. Now tell me why I'm going to trust the claims about Afghanistan?
"By the way,it's very offensive to me that anyone would compare our troops to nazis or fascists"
You are free to be as offended as you choose to be. I didn't for a second mistake our troops for nazis or fascists. They are directly aiding the US military objectives in Afghanistan and those objectives in the middle east are invasionary and agressive, not defensive, and not justified. So in a looser sense, I feel that in supporting the US led agression in the Middle East, are closer to actions of Hitler than to that of the allies. The second world war as a parrallel doesn't fit that well to the current conflicts IMO anyway.
Those who join the military must obey the hierarchy. They willingly sacrifice their personal freedom to that of the state. It is the Prime Minister and his government that decides how to apply the military. The Prime Minister often uses the propaganda tactic of telling us "we must support the troops." Really what he means is that we must support their policies. The policy of the new Conservative government is to always follow their allies.
Because of the hierarchical and dangerous nature of the work the troops must trust and obey. They must rely on each other. They must do as they are told. That is the nature of their job. Saying that they support the mission is meaningless because they have no real choice.
On the other hand, those of us who are not part of that hierarchy, must care enough about the troops and our country to look closely at the mission they have been given. Is it right, is it just, is it realistic, does it fit with our values?
Many of us feel that the Afghanistan mission has been a mistake from the very beginning. It took military action against a criminal offence which is an over reaction. It is hard for someone with family taking such risks to even consider that our government might be putting them at risk for the wrong reasons or needlessly. I understand that because I have close friends whose son is now fighting his life after being injured in Afghanistan.
While we might not agree with the Taliban system of strict moral law coupled with a strict family hierarchy, they did destroy the opium trade and sought to grow food to feed the people rather than produce drugs to sell on the global market. They achieved a measure of security in a land that had been disrupted by war for decades. They were able to stop much of the rape that was used a means that was used by some Afghan factions to dismean their opponents. Since our troops arrived the opium trade has flourished and the people need food.
Certainly the Taliban practice a repressive brand of Islam. However, many of their beliefs are not unlike some in the Christian right. They believe in the union of church and state, the traditional hierarchical family, separate spheres for men and women, and the rule of "moral" law. What they oppose is foreign interference in their lands.
Our governments, both Liberal and Conservative, have sent our troops to interfere in their world. I don't believe that is in the best interests of our troops or of our country.
---
"I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden
No bad apples.
Just easily misled sheep, tricked by sophisticated techniques of mass media, government propoganda, and military psy-ops procedures. Shock and disorientate, provide a parental figure to lead, and then remove all culpability.
Result?
Instant Nazi Stormtrooper. You don't have to grow them that way, like in Star Wars.
---
“The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous, the essential act of warfare is the destruction of the produce of human labour”
All that guy needs is a good scratch behind the ears. Wonder if MRS armyguy would oblige?
---
“The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous, the essential act of warfare is the destruction of the produce of human labour”
You should be offended that your sister has been put in harms way to better a gaggle of plutocrats and oil barons pocketbooks. And you should be thanking me and the others in this country who truly care for your sister and would spare her from the nightmares that are sure to plague her in the future. You are proud that your sister can kill while we would surely embrace her for a peackeeping role.
I hope your brave sister lives to defend this country as she most likely signed on for and not get caught up in your twisted bloodthirty jingoism!