The Last Straw: Boycott The U.S.

Posted on Friday, March 11 at 19:15 by Milton

Was I ever relieved when Rosie emailed me that night to say she had arrived safely in Guatemala City.

After I got over my anger at her rude treatment, I told myself: that’s it. Time to hit the Yanks where it hurts, the only place they care about it: their wallets. From now on, I’m going to boycott U.S. products as much as possible and will not travel there, until they show they are a civilized nation. Twenty years ago South Africa was a pariah state, boycotted by all people of conscience for its brutal treatment of the black majority. The international boycott of South African products was a powerful weapon in forcing the apartheid regime to change. It gave citizens around the world a practical way of making a difference.

Today a rogue nation defies world opinion by occupying another country for its oil and to wield political power in a key world region. It continues its slaughter there with so little respect for human life that it doesn’t bother counting the victims of its war. It tortures its prisoners of war with impunity. Meanwhile it runs a concentration camp in Cuba where, despite repeated pleas, it refuses to obey internationally respected rules for the human treatment of prisoners. The global supercop dismisses calls for an international criminal court out of hand.

In the face of stark evidence of climate change, the rogue nation thumbs its nose at 141 nations in the world that have agreed to act against this looming ecological threat.

The list goes on. The point is, what are we going to do about it? Is it simply enough to march in the next antiwar rally, as important as that is? Or don’t we need to ratchet up the pressure on the U.S. through economic pressure? A boycott of U.S. products might seem like an extreme step. But many citizens of Muslim nations started boycotting American products when the U.S. invaded Iraq two years ago. They were joined by a growing number of Europeans and even some Americans, led by Adbusters’ Boycott Brand America campaign. The recent near-murder of Italian journalist Giuliana Sgrena by U.S. troops in Iraq is sure to bolster the ranks of Europeans who boycott the U.S. The British consumer group Ethical Consumer found that 20 percent of European and Canadian consumers questioned in a recent survey said they avoid buying U.S. products to protest the Iraq war and U.S. foreign policy. The Victoria Peace Coalition has endorsed a U.S. boycott.

The dim-witted cowboy who can barely speak coherently may be the frontman for this rogue nation. But behind him is a powerful array of corporate interests for whom he is headwaiter. What they want, Bush delivers: tax cuts that shovel even more money into their pockets, gutting of environmental laws that let them pollute with impunity, and now plans to destroy the U.S. social security system so corporations can invade this market. As Ralph Nader said, George Bush is a corporation masquerading as a politician. A boycott confronts this corporate behemoth head-on. And it will serve to educate people about the corporate interests behind the Bush throne.

A U.S. boycott also helps protect the environment. As the Finnish environmental organization Dodo notes, “The world’s consumers have a responsibility to help President Bush consider the (Kyoto) issue anew…By boycotting American products we will decrease U.S. production and the country’s rapidly growing energy consumption.”

I am not entirely comfortable with the boycott tactic, because of the hundreds of Americans I’ve met who share my values. I know that many Americans are resisting the Bush regime. But not enough. Americans, if they chose to, could rise up and force the U.S. war machine to a halt. Yes, it would be very tough and would require a massive mobilization. But did the Ukrainians find it easy to overthrow the corrupt regime that had been oppressing them?

This is a question of conscience. It’s time to put our money where our values.

Murray MacAdam is an author and advocacy worker in Toronto, Canada.

Published on Friday, March 11, 2005 by CommonDreams.org [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on March 13, 2005]

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sat Mar 12, 2005 4:16 am
    Right on Murray--I've avoided buying U.S. for years and go into a rant when an aquaintance mentions WalMart, Safeways, Monsanto, Cargill, ADM, Dow, Dupont, etc.etc. But where is our politician who advocates buying back Canadian control of the resource industries these groups control? Vern

  2. Sat Mar 12, 2005 5:37 am
    umm- sorry to be a sore loser - EVERYONE is searched. They then do RANDOM extra searchs of passengers. Both Canadian and American officials do this. She was not singled out for any reason. Yes maybe the US customs official let his own bias towards good volunteer work invade his professional position, but I repeat - suck it up - it happens to all of us.

    I know because I'm on the inside, and we get searched too.

  3. Sat Mar 12, 2005 5:39 am
    oops - i should have added - i do support the boycott though - just because of the war though, not because of airport screeners doing what they are paid to do.

  4. Sat Mar 12, 2005 6:08 am
    I just do my best to boycott anything made by The Corporation.

    The Amerikans don't make anything anymore to boycott.

    Even those silly flags they wave are made in China :-)

  5. Sat Mar 12, 2005 6:34 am
    What is with all this talk lately from Washington calling Canada and the U.S. "Family". I don't have any family there, never did. We're not related at all. The closest sane relationship one could call our two countries is "neighbours" though even that is a stretch when you consider the usual benign and civil image it conjures up. We have a lot of neighbours, Denmark, France, Russia, and they don't cause us near the problems the U.S. does. Maybe we should get to know our other neighbours a better. Let's have a Kyoto parteeee! I'll bring the smoked salmon.

  6. Sat Mar 12, 2005 9:24 am
    RIGHT ON!
    I have stopped buying anything made in USA.
    Magazines,calendars,cars,furniture,anything.
    If it says product of USA,I don`t buy.
    As for the airport search,live with it.We all get searched!

  7. Sat Mar 12, 2005 2:52 pm
    It would be worth it for you all to pick up the book United States of Europe. You will be surprised as to what well known Companies are European owned now. Shell for example is owned I believe by a company in Germany, or somewhere in Europe.

    Kevin

  8. Sat Mar 12, 2005 3:28 pm
    Shell's full name is Royal Dutch/Shell (so guess where it's based).

    Wonder if they had any influence over the Netherlands joining the "coalition of the willing" despite a lake of public support?

  9. Sat Mar 12, 2005 3:30 pm
    Whoops, lack of public support, not lake!

  10. Sat Mar 12, 2005 5:54 pm
    What the hell is a US customs officer doing in Toronto, questioning a Canadian who`s leaving Canada for Guatemala? They have no business here!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  11. by hoopoe
    Sat Mar 12, 2005 6:14 pm
    Probably had a layover in a US airport, as I doubt there is a flight from Canada straight to Guatamala. American customs has done their screening before boarding in Canadian airports for years now (I guess it would be better if you are refused entry to be closer to home anyway).

    Shell has always been European-owned and are based out of the Netherlands and Britain.

    While airport customs and security do monitor everyone and scan their bags, they certainly do not search everyone. I do not disagree with the random searches but there is definitely a qualitative difference between Canadian customs officials and American officials. On a trip to San Francisco about 1.5 years ago, the American customs agents wore scowls on their faces and very curt (bordering on rude) in their questions and seemed to suspect that every single person who came through was lying to get into the US, which all amounted to a very unwelcoming experience. Overall, they conveyed a sense of resentment that you were visiting their country. In comparison, the Canadian customs agents on my return were friendly and smiling (literally).

  12. Sat Mar 12, 2005 6:45 pm
    I have no objection to border officials properly and completely screening travellers, conducting random searchs, or even directed searches when circumstances truly warrant. It's their job, and we all benefit from it. However, we have every right to expect that it be done in a professional, polite and expeditious manner, that there be no racial profiling, and that the legitimate travel plans of individuals are not interrupted by or held hostage to PETTY BUREAUCRACY, SMALL TIME BIGOTRY OR PERSONAL PREDJUDICE. In this instance, viewing the incident (or at least what I know of it) from the perspective of a former professional, I can find only one fault with the actions of the US officer. He should never have asked why the traveller was going to Guatemala. It was none of his business. The appropriate question would be "why are you going to the United States?"...and the appropriate answer would be "I am transiting through the United States en route to Guatemala, or wherever." The officer could then, if he wished, ask what she was bringing into the US and how long she expected to be there, then verify her declaration with a search, if he chose to. All that is routine. It is the responsibility of Guatemalan authorities to determine why she wished to enter that country and what she was bringing in there. They have no pre-clearance treaty with the United States that I am aware of. Perhaps the tone and demeanour of the US officer were not all they should have been, but it is impossible to determine that unless you actually witnessed the clearance. It is after all a difficult and demanding job. Having said that, tales of Canadians being mistreated by US officals both at airports and land border crossings are legion, and far too numerous to be ignored or dismissed any longer. These days far too many Canadians are being denied entry to the US for reasons that do not make any sense, or for no discernible reason at all. It is likely a product of the raving political paranoia that presently grips that country. The real culprit is the weak Canadian government, which does nothing effective to protect the interests of its citizens. If a Canadian protests, the government often responds with flimsy excuses if it responds at all, sometimes in tones and terms every bit as arrogant as the complainant claims to have experienced from the US officals. That's not good enough, and we have to demand better. I think we are all worried, and not just a little bit alarmed, about what is happening in the United States. But a spotty, poorly observed boycott of the US or its products and services would have absolutely no impact and perhaps hurt the wrong people. Again, the solutions lie with our own government. Under the mesmeric thrall of big business, their policies towards the US often do not serve the interests of most Canadians. This is something we can and must change, and it is the best way to make a real difference. We must help ourselves, and not always blame the Americans.

  13. Sat Mar 12, 2005 8:08 pm
    ah dave - when you catch a flight to the US from a Canadian airport - the second you enter the US customs area -you are in American territory for all legal purposes - sort of like an embassy. they can enforce their laws within that area. i have special clearance to enter their area at will - it is not a big deal.

  14. Sat Mar 12, 2005 8:14 pm
    we just have a better system overlooking airport screening. it is mandated first: by the minister of transport - then transport canada - then CATSA - then the local contractor (at most Canadian airports that is Aeroguard - a union company)

    They are taught as part of their CATSA training to try to be friendly because tourism is an important business and the first person travellers usually see - or the last they see are the screeners. first and last impressions count the most. its simple really - we care while they may not always.

    security is a must - lets be realistic. it s not only terrorists that have to be screened out. its the drunk with a weapon. its the criminal packing blade and planning on having a few on board. its the drug mules. look at Reyat - not a terrorist of the osama kind, but certainly brought lots of death and came from vancouver. as long as people want to harm others - airplanes will be a target.

    if you get what you deem to be shitty service while going through screening or customs - tell them. write a letter to the head office or to the government official in charge -they get enough - they change the rules. I have seen it happen here numerous times.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news