But it wasn't always clear that this would be the case — something that's important to keep in mind when dealing with the intense competition from Asia these days, says Mr. Holt, RBC's assistant chief economist.
Before Canada signed on to the Canada-U.S. free-trade agreement in 1988 and the North American free-trade agreement in 1993, critics charged that Canadian production would move south, exports would evaporate, jobs would dry up, foreign investment in Canada would deteriorate, the tax base would shrink, and the restructuring would force the country into a painful and long-term funk.
The adjustment was not without pain, but the end result, after 18 years of free trade, has made the criticisms look frivolous, the paper argues. The paper, provided to The Globe and Mail, is to be presented at the Canadian American Business Council's annual forum on competitiveness this week.
Exports have soared and foreign direct investment in Canada has risen substantially. Government coffers are full to overflowing, and Canada's fiscal situation is the envy of many a rich country. And while many of Canada's top companies have been bought by foreigners, often American, Canadian companies have been just as busy buying up U.S. firms, the study says.
Still, public opinion is not completely onside, and many trade experts and politicians alike have raised questions about the value of NAFTA in light of Canada's failure to prevail over the United States in the costly softwood lumber dispute.
As well, wage growth has been disappointing, and Canada's record on productivity has been lacklustre since the agreements came into effect. But those problems predate North American free trade, and were well entrenched in Canada in the 1980s, Mr. Holt argues.
Over all, the initial adjustment to the FTA and NAFTA was painful at first, but successful after a few years of restructuring, he says. And Canada can hope for a repeat of that experience as it deals with intense trade competition from China and India, as long as it takes some key steps to ensure a strong footing.
With adjustment to NAFTA under Canada's belt, the economy is in the midst of yet another major transition, this time dealing with the rise of Asia — now a major source of goods and services of every kind.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20061106.wrnafta06/BNStory/Business/home
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on November 6, 2006]
Note: http://www.theglobeandm...

Uh, did I miss something? Canada DID prevail, in ruling after ruling. It was the USA that did not honor the NAFTA agreement, and it was Bush's bum-buddy Harper that allowed the US to violate the terms of the agreement with a capitulation on the dispute.
NAFTA crashed and burned with the softwood lumber dispute, and no matter how many coats of new paint you put on it, it's still a burning wreck.
That should read, "in light of Canada's capitulation, submission and utter failure to protect one of its largest industries from American tactics designed to undermine and ultimately take control that industry".
One sector that has definitely reaped the rewards is transportation. There is a shortage of truck drivers because Canadian natural resources are just so plentiful that we can't get rid of it all with the number of trucks we have.
Canada probably is doing better over all than what we were prior to the FTA but that only compares the way we used to do things to the way we do them now. That really hasn't changed much. We used to dig it up, cut it down, pump it out and ship it off but with the FTA we just do all that faster. What we should've done was maybe add a little value to the pulp we ship to China, the logs to Japan, the ore to the US, etc..
If we were to do that, it would likely make our current economic situation look laughable.
---
Everybody got to deviate from the norm
Free trade is not a boon, it is a boondoggle. Like anything else, it is nothing more than a tool used by the super wealthy to economically destroy the working class.
I'm sure some have, but not the population. Assumidly foreign owners are not being labeled as "Canadians". Millworkers are going to be ticked, seeing they are not being refered to as "Canadians".
---
Expect little from life and get more from it.
Nothing new here. Back on Oct.18, 1991 the then Executive VP of the RB, Edward Neufeld, said in a speech in Singapore, taken verbatim from a tape I made of the original broadcast: "It is in the national interest and it makes sense for Canadian manufacturers to move to Mexico, and cheap labour to remain competitive, or perish, and bring back the profits to repay investors".
That was long before NAFTA became reality, but these jerks were already counting on it.
Ed Deak.
I'd love to be able to gather all those who believe this competition garbage, and put them on an island with limited resources, and NO access in/out to the outside world.
I'd then inforn them that there are too many of them, and they would have to "downsize" by 50 percent in order to be eligible for further supplies.
I'd then leave them to their own devices, and after they reached their goals, I'd repeat the process.
Once they achived those goals, I'd inform them that the island has been leased out as a firing/weapons test range, and that they'd have to leave before three months have passed.
Naturally, I'd make sure they got the notification one week before the date they had to leave.
I'd then wait 3 more months jst to make them sweat, then beging bombing.
Any who survived would be used as cheap labour, and rewarded according to thei past deeds.
Any who complained would be tied up and tossed into the lagoon, conviently full of salt water crocodiles and whatever the most aggressive shark species residing in that area happened to be.
I know it's visious, but damn, wouldn't it be ironic?
Their fate would be as bad as the fate they so flppantly dished out to millions.
That, is MY idea of justice fairly applied.
---
"and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"
"The Weapon" - Rush
---
"And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche