Bush In Canada: A Lingering Impression

Posted on Wednesday, December 22 at 13:22 by sthompson
"We just had a poll in our country when people decided that the foreign policy of the Bush administration ought to stay in place for four more years. ...it's a foreign policy that also understands that we've got an obligation to defend our security." Though everybody in the world except for his half of divided America believes that his administration is conducting an illegal and globally destabilizing war in Iraq, "I made some decisions, obviously, that some in Canada didn't agree with, like, for example, removing Saddam Hussein and enforcing the demands of the United Nations Security Council." Though Canadians in particular have been very cool to Mr. Bush's unilateralism and suspicious of his motives in Iraq, "I fully understand there are some in my country - probably in your country and around the world - that do not believe that Iraq has the capacity for self-government, that they're willing to sign those people up for tyranny. That's not what I think." ``It is cultural condescension to claim that some peoples or some cultures or some religions are destined to despotism and unsuited for self-government,'' he said. ``Today in the Middle East, the doubters and pessimists are being proven wrong.'' Mr. Bush oozed a jittery confidence. He knew exactly what he wanted to say and even how to say it with a homely dyslexia. He made no overt statements about policy direction, but you could feel the menace of the cards that he, in typical Bush fashion, kept hidden close to his vest. Of course, Mr. Bush came to Canada for his reasons. Canadian pundits pointed out that his early visit surprised the Prime Minister's Office. Canadians had been expecting the visit to be a little mending of fences but understandably mostly for American domestic consumption. There are minor but irritating trade disputes on lumber and beef that some Canadian leaders hoped Mr. Bush could be persuaded to end. But mending fences with a political lightweight such as Canada was not really on the president's agenda. The appeasers - the business class and fellow travellers who still think that Canada made a mistake in not being on side with the US on Iraq and who decry any protest that might injure trade with the States, no matter that it was an illegal, imperial war - must also have had a hard time listening to this cocky but obviously double-speaking president who left an impression that he didn't give a hoot about Canada's trade troubles with the US, or NAFTA or the WTO for that matter. Instead, probably breaking agreed-upon planning for the visit, Mr. Bush made surprise comments about Canada's participation in his planned missile defense shield. Some international observers stated that the Bush visit was believed part of a new wider campaign to get western nations on side for participation in this shield and in doing so for weaponization in space - a big no-go in Canada. The security set a Canadian precedent. Demonstrators were mostly kept far away in obligatory Bush fashion. Mr. Bush did not address parliament for fear of being heckled which could have made harmful sound bites on US news. The group Lawyers Against the War (LAW) endeavored to get Mr. Bush arrested for being responsible for US military use of torture in Iraq, but police and court officials weren't interested. Mr and Mrs. Bush left the country unscathed. Polling showed that the president's visit hardly affected Canadian opinion of Bush and the US, and any new American appreciation of Canada - "Bush Gets Chilly Reception in Ottawa" was a typical US media headline - is even more unlikely. Did Bush look presidential back home? Probably, but who cares. But observers seeking insight into what the administration of the world's foremost power is going to do in their second four-year term must have left with a lingering impression of a slimy rat, cocky and bold, intent upon maximizing his ratty existence - with, in all probability, much more negative effects for Canadians and the rest of the world.

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Thu Dec 23, 2004 5:15 pm
    Of course Dubya wasn`t here to mend the fence that various past US administrations damaged all on their own. He was just touching base with a fellow corporate fascist puppet. You know, ensuring that Canada`s resources flow freely to the wealthy on the continent, without benefitting the Canadian people like it should.After all, the USA burned themselves up too fast, and now as they begin to crash, they put their arm around Canada and say, " Your resources are important to the well being of the continent, right buddy. - RIGHT, BUDDY? "

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  2. Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:58 pm
    "He made no overt statements about policy direction, but you could feel the menace of the cards that he, in typical Bush fashion, kept hidden close to his vest."

    President Bush can keep playing poker. The bankers will not finance him forever. He will have to pay his country debts some day. And return to detox.



    ---
    "We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"

  3. Thu Dec 23, 2004 9:44 pm
    "President Bush can keep playing poker. The bankers will not finance him forever."

    I don't see why he would ever have to answer to anyone, he's done much worse than not pay a couple of loans and he still got re-elected.

    "He will have to pay his country debts some day. And return to detox."

    GWB the first 'Dry Drunk' President, much worse than a regular drunk. HE won't be paying anything back. HE will be rolling in the profits that HE has brought to friends like Chenney. HIS only downfall will be as the world's 2nd biggest scapegoat in the eyes of history , next to Hitler. One man isn't that powerful there's no convincing me otherwise...it's just that our simple hollywood-loving-consumer-minds won't let us get past the fact that there could be more to the mess created in the last 8 years than just one man.

    I am sure the future will prove me right.

    ---
    When an invasion can bring a country its freedom then unconsciousness is true happiness.

  4. Sun Dec 26, 2004 2:02 am
    Hitler was a scapegoat? Do you know what the word means? Call someone who has a dictionary and ask.

  5. Sun Dec 26, 2004 2:17 am
    JJ, get lost !!

  6. Sun Dec 26, 2004 4:50 pm
    I understand there is a danger I might make you think.

  7. Sun Dec 26, 2004 4:51 pm
    I meant "he" might make you think. (Hee hee)

  8. by avatar Jesse
    Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:04 pm
    JJ, I can see your IP address, quit replying to yourself.

    ---
    Canadians are asking, why do americans hate us? They hate our freedoms: our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to disagree with each other.

  9. by hoopoe
    Tue Dec 28, 2004 8:19 am
    <blockquote>"I made some decisions, obviously, that some in Canada didn't agree with, like, for example, removing Saddam Hussein and enforcing the demands of the United Nations Security Council."</blockquote><p>I think Bush must have more bowel movements in a day than thoughts in his head. From the above quote, it is clear that not only does he not understand history in general but he doesn't even remember the history that he himself has created. What he did in Iraq had nothing to do with the UN; in fact, just the opposite as the security council did not support removing Saddam Hussein from Iraq and urged him to let the inspections continue! If he truly wanted to carry out the security council wishes, he wouldn't have interfered with lifting the UN sanctions, thus saving hundreds of thousands of lives.

  10. Sun Jan 02, 2005 7:33 pm
    all the countries opposing the iraq pre-emption signed the un resolution, but stood against doing anything about wmd they agreed were there. mainly the countries implicated in the oil-for-food scam. canada isn't the only country who profiteers off of dictatorships, like castro in cuba. big countries like france and russia prefer to sell weapsons to terrorists while pretending to be against them. russia lost two planes and dead school kids with that frame of mind. it will be interesting to see what gets blown up and who gets killed in france. terrorists are such fair weather friends. they only know ya when they can get weapons from ya, then they shoot you in the back. typical canadians.

  11. by hoopoe
    Tue Jan 04, 2005 2:57 am
    You don't know what the hell you're talking about. The <u>FACT</u> of the matter is that the UN <u>DID NOT AGREE</u> there were WMD in Iraq. In <u>FACT</u>, their chief inspector Hans Blix said that they had not found any evidence of WMD or that Saddam Hussein was trying to resurrect his earlier WMD programs at the time Bush wanted UN approval to attack Iraq. <p> The oil for food scam was perpetrated by a few individuals and not countries or governments. <p> You think the US doesn't sell weapons to terrorists? Just who do you think created Al-Quaida by handing advanced military hardware to Bin-Laden (not to mention millions of dollars) to fight the Russians in Afghanistan; your beloved US, of course? They also sold weapons to Iran shortly after they had held hostages and had a government very inimical to the west and the US in particular. Closely linked to this sad episode in American history, of course, is the <u>FACT</u> that your beloved US hired the Contras to murder civlians (mostly unarmed farmers and peasants) in a campaign of fear in Nicaragua all because such people had the temerity to democratically elect the socialist Sandanista government (you read correctly, democratically elected; isn't the USA supposed to be promoting democracy?). Not only did America sell weapons to terrorists in this instance but by extension played a direct role of a terrorist (hidden behind the face of the Contras, of course). In fact, it is the US who is the biggest small arms dealer in the world, including explosives commonly used by terrorists. <p> Maybe you could explain just exactly how Canada has profited from such a poor country as Cuba. Quite to the contrary, Canada has engaged in trade with Cuba and it is on a comparatively small level as our total trade goes or trade between any two nations for that matter. I think it is safe to assume that since you bring up Cuba in particular you are most likely from the US whose big beef about Cuba is based on the fact that Castro ousted the mafia and took over their hotels and booted out exploitive American corporations and seized their assets in Cuba (assets that had more than paid for themselves with such exploitation). <p> Your assertion that France, Russia, Canada, and I guess any other nonamerican country is a friend of terrorists is idiotic and shows that your ability to properly analyze world events is at a child's level.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news