Scholars Repudiate Official Version Of 9/11

Posted on Saturday, January 28 at 19:27 by Milton
These experts contend that books and articles by members and associates have established that the World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down by controlled demolitions and that the available relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the official story about the attack on the Pentagon. They believe that the government not only permitted 9/11 to occur but may even have orchestrated these events to facilitate its political agenda.

The society includes U.S. and international faculty and students of history, science, military affairs, psychology, and even philosophy. According to its spokesmen, S9/11T represents a concerted effort to uphold the standards of truth and justice and to strengthen democracy in this nation, which has taken a terrible hit in the aftermath of 9/11, when "everything changed." Its function is to bring scientific rigor to the study of 9/11 phenomena.

Note: (PRWEB via PR Web Direct) "Scholars for 9/11 Truth"

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by avatar Jacob
    Sun Jan 29, 2006 4:59 am
    I have known this for a fairly long time. Go to a website <a href="http://www.whatreallyhappened.com">http://www.whatreallyhappened.com</a> and see many reports about the growing body of knowledge on this.<br />
    <br />
    When I read the "official version" of the structural engineering reasons of the collapse, as an article in the American Society of Civil Engineers magazine a few years ago, I did not believe it. Too many buzz words. In this long article (almost half the magazine) there was no mention at all of "WTC Building 7" which was not hit by a plane at all, but yet imploded as other buildings do that are demolished on purpose. Enjoy that website!!!<br />
    <br />
    <br />

  2. Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:17 am
    I can recall a TV program about sky scrapers around the time of 911. One interveiw was with the architects who designed the World trade towers in NYC. They stated that an aircraft shouldn't have toppled the towers. I laughed out loud thinking their ego was at stake. An airplane crashing into the building is not a normal event. I however, quit laughing as the program continued. More and more architects explained how most towers built today, wouldn't have fallen as those towers did. The inner skeleton makes it impossible.

    It is inconceivable that identification from one of the hijackers, in the plane that hit a tower, was found amongst the rubble. Very inconceivable and that has to make one think.

    That am program was never aired again. (at least not on any channel I get)

  3. Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:38 am
    I received the following a couple of days ago on another list I'm on and forward it without comment, except, when we were watching the live telecast as the towers burned and collapsed, and couldn't believe it.

    Ed Deak.
    --------------------------------------------------------

    1. The omission of evidence that at least six of the alleged hijackers---including Waleed al-Shehri, said by the Commission to have stabbed a flight attendant on Flight 11 before it crashed into tthe North Tower of the WTC---are still alive.


    2. The omission of evidence about Mohamed Atta---such as his reported fondness for alcohol, pork, and lap dances---that is in tension with the Commission’s claim that he haad become fanatically religious.


    3. The obfuscation of the evidence that Hani Hanjour was too poor a pilot to have flown an airliner into the Pentagon.


    4. The omission of the fact that the publicly released flight manifests contain no Arab names.


    5. The omission of the fact that fire has never, before or after 9/11, caused [an American] steel-frame building to collapse.


    6. The omission of the fact that the fires in the Twin Towers were not very big, very hot, or very long-lasting compared with fires in several steel-frame buildings that did not collapse.


    7. The omission of the fact that, given the hypothesis that the collapses were caused by fire, the South Tower, which was struck later than the North Tower and also had smaller fires, should not have collapsed first.


    8. The omission of the fact that WTC 7 (which was not hit by an airplane and which had only small, localized fires) also collapsed---an occurrence that FEMA admitted it could not explain.


    9. The omission of the fact that the collapse of the Twin Towers (like that of Building 7) exemplified at least 10 features suggestive of controlled demolition.


    10. The claim that the core of each of the Twin Towers was “a hollow steel shaft”---a claim that denied the existence of the 47 massive steel columns that in reality constituted the core of each tower and thhat, given the “pancake theory” of the collapses, should have still been sticking up many hundreds of feet in the air.


    11. The omission of Larry Silverstein’s statement that he and the fire department commander decided to “pull” Building 7.


    12. The omission of the fact that the steel from the WTC buildings was quickly removed from the crime scene and shipped overseas before it could be analyzed for evidence of explosives.


    13. The omission of the fact that because Building 7 had been evacuated before it collapsed, the official reason for the rapid removal of the steel---that some people might still be alive in the rubble under the steel---made no sense.


    14. The omission of Mayor Giuliani’s statement that he had received word that the World Trade Center was going to collapse.


    15. The omission of the fact that President Bush’s brother Marvin and his cousin Wirt Walker III were both principals in the company in charge of security for the WTC.


    16. The omission of the fact that the west wing of the Pentagon would have been the least likely spot to be targeted by al-Qaeda terrorists, for several reasons.


    17. The omission of any discussion of whether the damage done to the Pentagon was consistent with the impact of a Boeing 757 going several hundred miles per hour.


    18. The omission of the fact that there are photos showing that the west wing’s façade did not collapse until 30 minutes after the strike and also that the entrance hole appears too small for a Boeing 757 to have entered.


    19. The omission of all testimony that has been used to cast doubt on whether remains of a Boeing 757 were visible either inside or outside the Pentagon.


    20. The omission of any discussion of whether the Pentagon has a anti-missile defense system that would have brought down a commercial airliner---even though the Commission suggested that the al-Qaeda terrorists did not attack a nuclear power plant because they assumedd that it would be thus defended.


    [Note that the author of this critique does not claim to be a structural engineer. Nor do I. Which makes both of us at least as (if not more) qualified than our leading critic here. . . whom I'm quite sure is otherwise intelligent and does not necessarily kick poodles for sport.]

  4. Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:16 pm
    Good stuff, seems the world is waking up. The Globalist Elite have been influencing world events for years, isn't it time we did something about it?<br />
    <br />
    Here's some online videos that might interest a few people, the first two are the latest and greatest, check them out:<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3498980438587461603&q=eyewitness">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3498980438587461603&q=eyewitness</a><br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change</a><br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9124194186333362123&q=9%2F11+reopen">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9124194186333362123&q=9%2F11+reopen</a><br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1336167662031629480&q=painful+deceptions">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1336167662031629480&q=painful+deceptions</a><br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8797525979024486145&q=9%2F11+ruppert">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8797525979024486145&q=9%2F11+ruppert</a><br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6529813972926262623&q=the+great+conspiracy">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6529813972926262623&q=the+great+conspiracy</a><br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=alex+jones&so=0">http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=alex+jones&so=0</a>

  5. by avatar Milton
    Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:25 pm
    If you go to the <a href="http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org">Scholars for 911 Truth</a> site you will find in depth scientific analysis of what took place on 911. They have also done an in depth analysis of the official story that was produced by the commission and they show it to be a pile of rubbish fit for consumption only by those who believe in magic. To top it off the company which excavated the rubble and shipped the steel to China before it could be metallurgically analyzed goes by the name of Controlled Demolition,Inc.. This company turns up at other terrorist events as well (Oklahoma and London). Eye witness accounts were ignored, black boxes mysteriously disappeared, molten iron was found in the WTC basements 8 weeks after the event took place, WTC building 7's collapse is not explained. <a>Have a look at the reports prepared by <a href="http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/fetzerexpandedx.htm">Fetzer</a> and <a href="http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html">Jones</a> . <p><a>This quote is from the <a href="http://www.kurtnimmo.com/?p=201">Another Day In The Empire</a> site. <p>"It’s ironic General Leonid Ivashov, former Chief of Staff of the Russian armed forces, delivers the truth on globalism and this truth, unavailable in the corporate media of the “free world,” is published in a newspaper in Las Tunas, Cuba. Ivashov tells us so-called international terrorism “is not something independent of world politics but simply an instrument, a means to install a unipolar world with a sole world headquarters, a pretext to erase national borders and to establish the rule of a new world elite” and “is a phenomenon that combines the use of terror by state and non-state political structures as a means to attain their political objectives through people’s intimidation, psychological and social destabilization, the elimination of resistance from power organizations and the creation of appropriate conditions for the manipulation of the countries’ policies and the behavior of people.” <p>Ivashov hits the nail square on the head. “The organizers of [the nine eleven] attacks were the political and business circles interested in destabilizing the world order” because they “were not satisfied with the rhythm of the globalization process or its direction.” As others have explained—most notably <a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BOL403A.html">Andreas von Bulow</a>, Bundestag member of a parliamentary commission which oversaw the three branches of the German secret service—only “secret services and their current chiefs” (or retired staff with “influence inside the state organizations”) have the “ability to plan, organize and conduct an operation of such magnitude. Generally, secret services create, finance and control extremist organizations. Without the support of secret services, these organizations cannot exist—let alone carry out operations of such magnitude inside countries so well protected.” Thus the obvious patsy “Osama bin Laden and ‘Al Qaeda’ cannot be the organizers or the performers of the September 11 attacks” because they “do not have the necessary organization, resources or leaders” (or the military and intelligence experience and knowledge required). Instead, “a team of professionals had to be created and the Arab kamikazes are just extras to mask the operation." <p>According to General Ivashov, the covert operation nine eleven was effective because it turned “the people’s demands to a struggle of undefined goals against an invisible enemy … destroying basic international norms and changing concepts such as: aggression, state terror, dictatorship or movement of national liberation” and also depriving “peoples of their legitimate right to fight against aggressions and to reject the work of foreign intelligence services.” <p>Here in America and likely much of Europe, General Ivashov’s message is all but invisible, since the corporate media assiduously ignores any discussion of nine eleven that does not take the fantastical Straussian neocon version of events as gospel truth. As an example of this, run a Google News search on General Ivashov—it will return the sole link to the Cuban newspaper above, peroid. <p>In order to combat the globalist agenda to reduce the planet to a “free trade” gulag, General Ivashov suggests the creation of “a geo-strategic organization (perhaps inspired in the Cooperation Organization of Shanghai comprised of Russia, China, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan) with a set of values different to that of the Atlantists,” that is to say the neolib-neocon faction (in Russia, many political analysts call defenders of “unipolar globalism” Atlantists, or as <a href="http://www.evrazia.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=244">A. Dugin</a> of the International Eurasian Movement describes it, “strategists of the Western civilization and their conscious supporters in other parts of the planet, aiming at putting the whole world under control and imposing the social, economic and cultural stereotypes typical of the Western civilization to all the rest of mankind…. The atlantists are the builders of the ‘new world order’—the unprecedented world system benefiting an absolute minority of the planet’s population”)." end quote <p>The list of exposed manufactured evidence is staggering because it shows the power that the major media wields over the minds of the supposedly educated people in the western civilisation.

  6. Mon Jan 30, 2006 4:24 am
    Here's some online videos that might interest a few people<<

    Very interesting and well represented. Of course you know that the US is also "in charge" of the internet. Perhaps enough copies have been downloaded and at this point futile to censor them.

    Side note* Some of the gold under the Trade Center was owned by the "Bank of Nova Scotia". That puzzles me!



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news