Bush Administration As Dangerous Now As Before

Posted on Monday, October 31 at 10:31 by 4Canada
That was just a small part of a broad pattern of deceit and double standards set by the president and his cabal of ideologues. Their mode of governance has been to do whatever they could get away with, including waging an unwarranted war on false pretences by fixing intelligence and exploiting public fears. Libby was part of the neo-con clique of Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz (now at the World Bank), John Bolton (at the United Nations), Zalmay Khalizad (current envoy to Iraq) and others who, in the 1990s, called for invading Iraq to preserve "U.S. access to oil" and to foster the safety of "friends and allies like Israel." Once in power, they wasted little time after 9/11 to put the Iraq plan into action, and fixed the facts to justify it. Hence, the tall tales of Saddam Hussein's ties to Al Qaeda, his weapons of mass destruction and the phoney story of nuclear cake from Niger, which is what CIA agent Valerie Plame's husband Joseph Wilson discredited, only to see a vengeful White House blow her cover. The probe into Libby and Rove will mean something only if it serves as the start of a process of holding this administration fully accountable for the deaths of 2,000 Americans and between 30,000 and 100,000 Iraqis, and the torture of hundreds in American detention centres. The people who gave us Iraq are now targeting Syria and Iran, and are likely to get more belligerent in the days ahead to divert attention from their mounting domestic woes. Canadians need to be alert to the possibility that Stephen Harper and other local chicken hawks, who wanted Canada to go to war in Iraq, may now want us to do Bush's bidding in his new ventures abroad. http://www.commondreams.org/views05/1030-24.htm

Note: http://www.commondreams...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Tue Nov 01, 2005 1:16 am
    Why is it that you cannot find any negative articles on Cuba, Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, Iraq under Saddam Hussien AND HIS SONS? Why can't you talk about how well they govern their populations and how everyone is free to say and do what they want. How their governments are free from the type of corruption that engulfs the Bush administration and while you are at it, how they treat THEIR prisoners?

  2. Tue Nov 01, 2005 1:33 am
    You are looking in the wrong section. Look under "War and Peace".

    Looking under "Uncle Sam" would naturally bring up stories about the US Government.



    ---
    "If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill

  3. Tue Nov 01, 2005 9:56 am
    I will treat the question as genuine.

    the government and some of the people of the USA as being the paragon s of democratic virtue.
    They are not! Those that believe the US is are deluding themselves

    Do you hoestly believe that by talking aboutthe similar corruptions of other countries legitimises "the type of corruption that engulfs the Bush administration" ?

    ---
    "The cost to the good people for their indifference to their public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." - Plato
    I don't make jokes. I just watch the governmen

  4. Tue Nov 01, 2005 4:34 pm
    No. It's just that you guys never look in other directions. Makes me wish the U.S.S.R. would have won the Cold War. Then your flag would be ALL red, with a hammer and sickle instead of a maple leaf.

  5. by avatar Darna
    Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:11 am
    This article comes from the section of this site called 'Eye on Uncle Sam'... so, although your question may be valid, it's misdirected. Why don't you use that passion and write your own article, then submit it? By the sounds of it, your arguments would be well-received and probably a healthy debate would come from it.

    ---
    "Let me be very clear about this. Steroids ought to be banned from baseball." G.W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Oct. 4, 2005

  6. Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:32 am
    >>Then your flag would be ALL red, with a hammer and sickle instead of a maple leaf.<<

    Why & how so? Did Canada show to much favoritism to Americans in the cold war?

  7. Wed Nov 02, 2005 5:29 am
    Are you that stupid, so as to ask a question like that?

  8. Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:00 am
    It looks like Mr. Bush has a better handle on the middle east then we could have thought. Iran wants to obliterate Israel. Who would stop Iran? The appeaser Euro Union, I doubt it. The U.N., I doubt it. Their too busy stealing money like the Canadian government. Me thinks that Mr. Bush trying to change the face of the middle east is not a bad goal. The other alternative is to kiss Israel away.

  9. Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:20 am
    The animosity between Jews and Arabs, Indians and Pakistanis, and whoever else, between whoever else is thousands of years old. I say leave them all alone and let them fight each other and who ever, if anyone, is left standing then I guess they won. It's just that simple.

  10. Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:49 am
    YA JUST DON'T GET IT DO YA?<br />
    <br />
    <br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/chapter_01.htm">http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/chapter_01.htm</a><br />
    Chapter I<br />
    <br />
    THE ACTORS ON THE REVOLUTIONARY STAGE<br />
    <br />
    <br />
    Dear Mr. President:<br />
    <br />
    I am in sympathy with the Soviet form of government as that best suited for the Russian people...<br />
    <br />
    Letter to President Woodrow Wilson (October 17, 1918) from William Lawrence Saunders, chairman, Ingersoll-Rand Corp.; director, American International Corp.; and deputy chairman, Federal Reserve Bank of New York<br />
    <br />
    <br />
    The frontispiece in this book was drawn by cartoonist Robert Minor in 1911 for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Minor was a talented artist and writer who doubled as a Bolshevik revolutionary, got himself arrested in Russia in 1915 for alleged subversion, and was later bank-rolled by prominent Wall Street financiers. Minor's cartoon portrays a bearded, beaming Karl Marx standing in Wall Street with Socialism tucked under his arm and accepting the congratulations of financial luminaries J.P. Morgan, Morgan partner George W. Perkins, a smug John D. Rockefeller, John D. Ryan of National City Bank, and Teddy Roosevelt — prominently identified by his famous teeth — in the background. Wall Street is decorated by Red flags. The cheering crowd and the airborne hats suggest that Karl Marx must have been a fairly popular sort of fellow in the New York financial district.<br />
    <br />
    Was Robert Minor dreaming? On the contrary, we shall see that Minor was on firm ground in depicting an enthusiastic alliance of Wall Street and Marxist socialism. The characters in Minor's cartoon — Karl Marx (symbolizing the future revolutionaries Lenin and Trotsky), J. P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller — and indeed Robert Minor himself, are also prominent characters in this book.<br />

  11. Thu Nov 03, 2005 6:14 am
    Re: the posting on who "won the Cold War".

    Nobody. With millions of others, many who died, I worked on the destruction of the USSR for 45 years with every weapon I could find and think of, with many contacts behind the Iron Curtain.

    When our reporters stood by the Berlin Wall, boasting that "The East has chosen capitalism over communism", I knew that the West will screw up. Capitalism and the USA have not won the Cold War any more than beating pathetic Iraq. The USSR collapsed from within through its own corruption, when people just got fed up. The same way as it will happen to the totally corrupt US empire, when its people wake up.

    Now, many, behind the former Iron Curtain wish they hadn't, because their living conditions still haven't reached the pre collapse levels 15 years later, while their ruling class became filthy rich on their backs.

    The people behind the Iron Curtain did not "choose capitalism", but desperately wanted to be free. What they got instead was another, far more vicious ruling class, many of them former communists, who are stealing their eyes out without even any coverups and excuses.

    So, stop the propaganda crap about "winning the Cold War" and get those goddamn B52s away from above our heads. The Cold War is supposed to be over. What the hell are those poor idiots training for to bomb ?

    Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC.

  12. Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:48 pm
    There is much truth to what you say, but that is an Canadian opinion which I understand. The Americans can't say so what and see how it all turns. That is one of the huge differences between our two countries. We have no real responsibility in the world and the Yanks have most of it. As Mark Steyn writing in the London Telegraph says "except for America the free world means a free ride".

  13. Thu Nov 03, 2005 5:29 pm
    Sorry Ed, but the collapse of the USSR was staged.

  14. Thu Nov 03, 2005 6:44 pm
    Could you please explain the staging ?

    The cold hard fact was that the people couldn't take the fraud any longer and stopped supporting it, as they are nown getting burned by capitalism. I maintained my contacts for 45 years, some in position to travel abroad, where they could write to me freely, without any secret police censorship. I didn't know the detailed facts in the USSR itself, but have had good information about the satellites, where I speak 2 languages.

    I have to admit, that in spite all this, the collapse with a whimper came as a surprise, thanks to Ghorbachov. This was something nobody could predict. The collapse itself was inevitable, as is the collapse of the US empire, because all empires self destruct, by going that one fatal step too far, but we were very much afraid of prolonged bloodshed and civil wars.

    Let's hope our present empire will go the same way.

    Ed Deak.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news