President Putin's Speech - The Student Becomes The Teacher

Posted on Monday, February 12 at 19:33 by whelan costen
The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, or USSR (more commonly known as the Soviet Union), was a constitutionally communist state that existed in Eurasia from 1922 to 1991. It was often referred to as Russia, (incorrectly) which was its largest and dominant constituent state. From 1945 until its dissolution in 1991, it was one of the world's two superpowers, along with the United States, that dominated the global agenda of economic policy, foreign affairs, and military operations; this period was known as the Cold War. For decades the Soviet Union was considered a threat to the free world. Reports of civilians being arrested, detained and disappearing were common. Great spy movies were made reflecting the harsh brutality of the KGB. ‘Roughly, the KGB's operational domain encompassed functions and powers like those exercised by the United States' Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the counter-intelligence (internal security) division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the National Security Agency, the Federal Protective Service, and the Secret Service.’ According to wikipedia.org. The Red Army was the most feared and ominous threat to the planet. We in the West, were treated to all kinds of stories, movies and themes which featured the ‘bad’ often Robotic Russian conquering the world, but alas at the last moment they were always overcome by a ‘good ol’ boy, heroic’ American. The two superpowers wielding the armor of battle while all of humanity held their collective breath, was so much a part of our reality, that when the Berlin Wall fell there was almost an audible sigh of relief and wonder throughout the world. No longer would we live with the trepidation of who might have access to the unholy button of nuclear war. The end of the Cold War had an incredible impact on the peoples’ dreams of peace. Apparently it had a valuable lesson for Vladimir Putin. The KGB is no more. Although Russia is still working through the path to a true democracy, where should they look for a living example? President Putin says in part, “We are seeing a greater and greater disdain for the basic principles of international law. And independent legal norms are, as a matter of fact, coming increasingly closer to one state’s legal system. One state and, of course, first and foremost the United States, has overstepped its national borders in every way. This is visible in the economic, political, cultural and educational policies it imposes on other nations. Well, who likes this? Who is happy about this? In international relations we increasingly see the desire to resolve a given question according to so- called issues of political expediency, based on the current political climate. And of course this is extremely dangerous. It results in the fact that no one feels safe. I want to emphasise this – no one feels safe! Because no one can feel that international law is like a stone wall that will protect them. Of course such a policy stimulates an arms race.” As with many teachers who find their student’s wisdom threatening to their position, the response to this students observations and wisdom echoing back, is met with hostility. I find no bravado in Mr. Putin’s speech. No cocky arrogance. No heroics or delusions. What is clearly evident is a man who has understood the dream of freedom, democracy, fairness and equality. His comprehension of the obstacles to reaching the dream of peace, ending poverty, homelessness and independence for every nation is clear, concise and passionate. If this speech was delivered by Robert or John Kennedy, Martin Luther King, or anyone born into a free nation the response would likely be quite different. These are interesting times. The ideals of democracy are flailing in the wind all around the so called, ‘free world’ and the leader of Russia is standing firmly with the tenets of democracy, fairness and freedom and reading the lessons back to the teachers. Mr. Putin is chastising the teachers, for their pursuit of World domination. They talk freedom and democracy for all, yet they hold dreams of a super-world-order, using tactics reminiscent of the old USSR. Have we flipped? Have we become what we feared? Is it reasonable to respond with anger, to a cautionary speech, reminding those of us who often brag about our democratic freedom, that we are off the path? Is it wise to not heed the warning of those who see and are brave enough to speak? The planet is on a path of destruction, of that there are few who doubt. What an incredible opportunity for the world to embrace a man with real vision! There may be others like him, but few with the opportunity to be heard. Shall we listen? I wonder if we shall see any Canadian politicians with the vision and the strength to stand with Mr. Putin in his commitment for all of the people of the world? All who stand for these ideals are encouraged to read this speech. The Universal, Indivisible Character of Global Security - Complete Transcript of Presentation to Munich Security Conferencehttp://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=PUT20070211&articleId=4741 -10- Contact info: http://web.mac.com/whelancosten Ph: 403-660-0449 [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on February 14, 2007]

Note: http://www.globalresear... http://web.mac.com/whel...

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by RPW
    Tue Feb 13, 2007 4:14 am
    <blockquote> Instead a nation called Russia developed, with a leader who is clearly trying to walk the democratic walk. </blockquote> I would say he is pursuing a "disciplined democracy"...............<p>---<br>"When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change." <br />
    -Max Planck<br />
    <br />

  2. Tue Feb 13, 2007 6:01 am
    I think it is encouraging, not to say he has all the answers, I suspect he is just
    exploring. It stands to reason that the freedom and democracy he was told he
    needed is nowhere in sight provoking his questions and concerns now. I mean
    the USSR walked away from Empire building and are attempting to build
    something different. It can't be easy when you can't find an example to follow.

    ---
    "aaaah and the whisper of thousands of tiny voices became a mighty deafening roar and they called it 'freedom'!"' Canadians Acting Humanely at home & everywhere

  3. by RPW
    Tue Feb 13, 2007 6:21 am
    Russians however, like to do things "big"........

    ---
    "When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change."
    -Max Planck

  4. by Deacon
    Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:02 am
    Yes, the Russians do like to do things in a big way.

    And it's that kind of drive that probably gives people like those who drew up the Plan for the new American Century all kinds of reasons not to sleep at night.

    Ironic, isn't it, the role reversal we see here?

    The former USSR out-democratising the USA.

    Who would have figured that one?

    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  5. by ouhite
    Tue Feb 13, 2007 10:06 am
    I was quite pleased to read about it too....

    as usual the US replied back with stupid, distorting comments (one Cold War is enough, There is no need for accusations in a multipolar world, etc.), and I was surprised (then again, not *that* surprised) that many mainstream sources seemed to have a bent towards the US's propagandist statements...

  6. Tue Feb 13, 2007 2:39 pm
    I find it interesting that all it takes to establish one's moral character in the eyes of Catherine is to criticize the US. Anti-American = automatic good guy. I would think that her recent experiences would have cured her of that particular delusion, but bashing the US seems to be the equivalent of holding a magnet next to her moral compass.

    Putin is an authoritarian thug, and has little business criticizing anyone. And you can start comparing the US to the Soviet Union when they start locking up Michael Moore and Noam Chomsky in gulags and sending tanks across the Canada/US border, not just investment dollars.

  7. Tue Feb 13, 2007 5:25 pm
    I find it interesting that telling the Global authority on Democracy that they should practice what they preach = Anti-American. Does telling the US that they should also practice real Capitalizm mean I would be anti-american?

    I also find it interesting that quoting Putin somehow makes Catherine anti-american. If I quote you, does that make me a Collectivist?

    ---
    "I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden

  8. Tue Feb 13, 2007 5:32 pm
    Sorry, forgot the second part off your rant:

    Putin is an authoritarian thug, no doubt. But after the breakup of the USSR, the WTO and western powers did NOT forgive the debt owed them by the USSR, and forced Russia to pay. Yeltsyn did the one stupid thing he could - started selling off the old Soviet infrastructure for bargain basement prices. Everything that could be used as a source of taxable income - he privatized. Now Putin is bringing that back into the economy. And he's being heavy handed about it. But he need to be, given the well financed corruption he faces.

    As for 'locking up Michael Moore and Noam Chomsky in gulags', have we forgotten Guantanamo?

    "And sending tanks across the Canada/US border, not just investment dollars."

    Investment? Do not make me laugh!

    ---
    "I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden

  9. Tue Feb 13, 2007 6:57 pm
    I agree with DC, Putin may be a thug, but at least he's putting his country first, and he's cutting out the parasitic leaches that were feeding off of his country. That's a hell of a lot more than we can say about Bush or Harper.

    The USA has absolutely no need to send tanks across the border since Harper and his groveling predecessors have been giving the USA whatever they asked for. The tanks will only come if we nationalize our resources and reassert our sovereignty like Putin is doing.

    As for locking up Noam, why? He agrees with the official 9/11 fantasy.

  10. Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:07 am
    Individualist, Russia has an anarchist movement. All the major cities have groups. They do not like Putin and Putin does not like them. But they do exist, they organize syndicalist unions, hold meetings, publish newspapers and have protest marches. Just like we do here. The main problem they face is not so much the state but neo-nazis who have attacked and killed some militants. Thus, your point about Moore and Chomsky is not apt. Putin did of course arrest some of the Russian Mafia types who had taken over the oil industry when the USSR went belly up, but as far as I can tell, genuine political dissidents have not suffered to any great deal, certainly not anything to the extent they have in US allies like Turkey, the Phillipines or Columbia.

  11. Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:08 am
    "As for 'locking up Michael Moore and Noam Chomsky in gulags', have we forgotten Guantanamo?"

    Has anyone been locked up there simply for speaking out against the US government or system? People are routinely incarcerated on the other part of that island for speaking out against *their* government. But hey, they have universal health care, so that makes it alright.

  12. Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:12 am
    You seem to have missed what I was saying. I was pointing out the folly of comparing the US government to *any* totalitarian regime, be it the USSR or Nazi Germany. I was not stating that Putin was in that class. I simply said he was an authoritarian thug who didn't have any business lecturing the US. Two different points.

  13. Wed Feb 14, 2007 2:17 am
    What can we do when our "leaders" find out, what many of us have known for years, that those "investment dollars", aren't worth the electricity that puts them onto computer screens and yet our politicians sold our country for them?

    Can we sue, or charge somebody for fraud ?

    Ed Deak.

  14. by Deacon
    Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:38 am
    "Has anyone been locked up there simply for speaking out against the US government or system?"

    A very interesting question.

    Considering the broad definition of "enemy combatant" being used by the boys in Homeland Security, it is indeed a very salient point to look into.

    And trust me my friend, I will now be looking into it, and if I find evidence that the US has indeed being doing the deeds your ask about, I will be more than happy to let you know.

    My question to you Individualist is this: If the US has been covertly warehousing it's political opponents at Guantanamo, what does that make the United States government using YOUR moral and ethical compass? Does it make them good or evil?

    Answer please.



    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news