"On Kyoto, I will say that our government will not be shipping hot air credits overseas. Our focus is on a domestic solution," Ambrose told reporters Wednesday following a one-hour meeting with Alberta Environment Minister Guy Boutilier.
"We draw the line at ensuring that there's a direct benefit to any of the legislative mechanisms or any of the international agreements that we are presently engaged in and that we will become engaged in in the future."
But Ambrose refused to discuss specifics of what will happen to the Kyoto accord or whether the Conservative government will scrap the deal to reduce Canada's emissions.
http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=4bded099-59b9-41d3-8019-617d4f1ad390&k=61102
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on February 16, 2006]
Note: http://www.canada.com/t...

And the Liberals did such a dandy job of cleaning up our act while lashing out at the Conservatives for advocating the scrapping of this deal. How much did pollution rise under their stewardship again... 12% or 20% or more? If the Cons scrap Kyoto, but actually reduce emmissions, isn't that a good thing?
Before the "we hate everything the <neo>cons come up with" crowd starts up, shouldn't we listen to what they are actually saying?
---
Dave Ruston
They have no position with the exception of proposing a clean air act without any plan to achieve clean air. We are so far behind European countries with respect to funding and implementing sustainable energy solutions that it’s a joke. Unless someone in the Conservative party changes their spots on this issue there is every reason to expect them to behave as they have in the past.
Mike
yeah, like that'll ever happen.
Too bad we couldn't reduce their verbal emissions, or better yet harness all the hot air they generate and use it as renewable energy.
Ottawa would lead the world if that happened.
I don't think they'll let you down, Mike.
Actually I think Muldoon was voted best environmental PM. Not kidding.
I don't doubt you DSR, but still wonder "who" is going to support a new multi-million dollar plan. KYOTO has already a lot of paying members and Canada can't be expected to foot the bill for their own. Look south and you'll see the support. The USA is already a polluter by the biggest magnitude. So what plan will the Conservatives come up with?
Why do people put up with Corporations polluting our environment for nothing? We should be so subsidised by these businesses that we get free education and first class health care at the very least!!! PFFT! Just another crime against the planet and all the things trying to live off it.
---
"And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche
The US provides the world with 24 percent of it's polution. If the US is paying the bill, I'm sure Harper will be a great benefit to the world as well. Apparantly he's going to "talk" to the US about our softwood as well. Harpers's ahead of his time.
<<Actually I think Muldoon was voted best environmental PM. Not kidding.>>
I had to consider my use of the word Conservative. What the hell does one call these guys, since they really aren't conservatives in a Canadian historical perspective.
Kind of sad that Brimo and the gang had a better environmental record then present day politicos.
Mike