Canadian Style Torture

Posted on Wednesday, September 07 at 10:41 by 4Canada
Mona Elfouli calls on Justice Minister Irwin Cotler, Prime Minister Paul Martin, Deputy PM Anne McLellan, Immigration Minister Joe Volpe and Ontario Minister for Corrections Monte Kwinter, to Respond to Her Husband's Demands for Medical Attention and Contact Visits with Children TORONTO: SEPTEMBER 6, 2005 -- After two months without food, secret trial detainee Mohammad Mahjoub, an Egyptian refugee held since June, 2000, without charge or bail at Metro West Detention Centre, is weak and in ill-health as he marks day 61 of a hunger strike. Almost eclipsed by the high-profile hunger strike of Syrian refugee Hassan Almrei, who ended his protest Saturday on Day 73 without food, Mahjoub has continued his quiet, determined battle for improved conditions of detention while he awaits the outcome of the lengthy court processes which will determine whether he will receive bail and, in the longer term, whether it is legal to deport him to torture in Egypt. Mahjoub is demanding, among other things: * a monthly contact visit with his children, denied to him after more than five years at Metro West; * proper medical treatment, including care for a knee injury sustained in jail, a liver biopsy to properly assess the Hepatitis C he contracted at the jail (which, despite being recommended by a doctor, has been denied for undisclosed security reasons) and a pair of glasses. (After protracted efforts by advocates outside the jail to bring an eye doctor in to see him, Mahjoub has not been able to fill a prescription for glasses in over 8 months.) "I am appealing to the people of Canada and to the Canadian government, the people who are responsible for Mohammad being in jail on secret evidence -- Irwin Cotler, Anne McLellan, Joe Volpe, Paul Martin-- and to the Minister responsible for jails in Ontario, Monte Kwinter -- to help us reach a solution so Mohammad can live," says Mona Elfouli, who has been married to Mahjoub since 1996. "I don't want to become a widow, and my two little children need their father home with them. But while we wait for bail, we need to make things more livable at the jail for my husband. He needs medical attention for his Hepatitis C, and it is torture for the children not to be able to hug and kiss their dad." Elfouli says her husband has struggled constantly for basic dignity at the jail, but has run up against institutional barriers. "We both appreciate that there are some very good people at the jail, some good guards and captains and caring people in the health care unit, but it is immigration that is making it so hard for him to get proper healthcare, and Mr. Kwinter's office refuses to allow the touch visits." Matthew Behrens, a friend of Mahjoub's who has offered $5,000 towards his release on bail, is concerned that government officials on all levels simply don't care. "This is, after all, a federal government that is determined to deport Mohammad and the other secret trial detainees to torture. The Ontario government has refused to sincerely negotiate, forcing these men to the point in their nonviolent protests that lifelong damage, if not death, will result. "So it's clear on one level that the governments don't really care about their lives. But one thing they do care about is votes. And we hope they see that a lot of formerly sure votes are in doubt, especially with blood on their hands should Mr. Mahjoub die in custody on their watch. Thousands of people responded in the past 10 days to the demands of both Mr. Almrei and Mr. Mahjoub, and those folks are disgusted at the insensitivity and callous lack of action of both the Ontario and federal governments. "Time is running out on Mr. Mahjoub. The government had better move soon." Last Friday, a delegation of medical professionals delivered a letter to Prime Minister Paul Martin's Montreal constituency office calling for immediate action to meet the conditions necessary to end the hunger strikes. "We regard the conditions under which Mr. Almrei and Mr. Mahjoub are currently detained to be unacceptable from a health standpoint," the letter read. "It is shocking that people have to resort to a hunger strike to demand conditions that we feel to be so basic and justified. Furthermore, it is imperative to understand that if this hunger strike continues much longer, a fatal outcome or at least a disability is to be expected. This is an entirely avoidable outcome and for these reasons we urge your urgent and immediate intervention to avoid an extremely regrettable consequence." The medical professionals note that, in addition to the immediate conditions giving rise to the protest, it is unacceptable that men such as Mahjoub are forced to deal with the psychological torture of indefinite detention and uncertainty over whether he may be deported to torture. By way of comparison, in 1981, Bobby Sands and 9 other IRA prisoners on hunger strike died after periods varying from 46 to 73 days after sustaining severe organ damage (e.g., blindness). Several survivors of the strike remain permanently handicapped. For more information, contact the Campaign to Stop Secret Trials in Canada at tasc@web.ca or (416) 651-5800. Our website is www.homesnotbombs.ca TAKING ACTION: Please write, call, fax the following individuals. A sample letter is provided below. Please cc your letters to Prime Minister Paul Martin (pm@pm.gc.ca ), Anne McLellan, Deputy Prime Minister, (McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca), Immigration Minister Joe Volpe (volpej@parl.gc.ca) and Justice Minister Irwin Cotler (cotlei@parl.gc.ca) CC correspondence to Campaign to Stop Secret Trials in Canada at tasc@web.ca or fax (416) 651-9770 NOTE: Mr. Kwinter's office will say this is a matter for the federal government and will try and shift your attention to Ottawa, since Mohammad is a federal detainee, but he is held in a provincial jail, so the province has the ability and responsibility to meet with him and change his conditions of detention. Monte Kwinter Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services 18th floor, 25 Grosvenor Street, Toronto, ON, M7A 1Y6 Phone: (416) 325-0408 Fax: (416) 325-6067 mkwinter.mpp@liberal.ola.org Anne McLellan Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness 13th Floor, 340 Laurier Ave. Ottawa, ON K1A 0P8 Phone: (613) 992-4524 Fax: (613) 943-0044 or McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca please cc: Paul Martin, Cotler, and Volpe Monte Kwinter Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services Government of Ontario Re: Hunger strike of Hassan Almrei Dear Mr. Kwinter, I am writing to urge you to take immediate action to meet the legitimate demands of Mohammad Mahjoub, who has been detained without trial in an Ontario prison for over five years and is now on a hunger strike to demand minimally decent conditions of detention. His main demands include proper medical treatment for the Hepatitis C he contracted at the jail (a prescribed liver biopsy has been denied), proper medical care for as knee injury sustained at the jail, filling a long-neglected prescription for eyeglasses, and touch visits with his young children once a month. Although he is a federal detainee, he is within your jurisdiction in a provincial jail, and it is therefore your responsibility to respond to this crisis. As of today (Tuesday, September 6), Mohammad Mahjoub is on Day 62 of his hunger strike. Mr. Mahjoub was already in poor health before beginning his current hunger strike, and medical professionals have stated, in a letter to Prime Minister Paul Martin September 2, 2005, that Mahjoub is at imminent risk of permanent, severe impairment, and very possibly, of death. By way of comparison: in 1981, Bobby Sands and 9 other IRA prisoners on hunger strike died after periods varying from 46 to 73 days after sustaining severe organ damage (e.g., blindness). Several survivors of the strike remained permanently handicapped. In 1996, many Kurdish hunger strikers in Turkey died after periods of 65 to 69 days. Please intervene immediately to try to find a humane solution to this situation. You have the power, and therefore the moral responsibility, to resolve this crisis. Surely it is not too much to ask for a monthly contact visit with two small children and for proper medical care. As Canadians, we pride ourselves on respecting basic human rights. Please remain true to this fundamental value. Should Mohammad Mahjoub die or be permanently handicapped, it would be to our lasting shame and dishonour as Canadians and as members of the human family. I look forward to your prompt response to my letter and to positive action to resolve this crisis. Sincerely, Name Address [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on September 7, 2005]

Note: www.homesnotbombs.ca

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Sep 07, 2005 10:33 pm
    We should be more concerned about bringing back capital punishment and setting a proper Canadian standard than squandering time and money on someone at best, of no Canadian or world consequence (realistically), at worst an undesirable of no particular value. If we are going to waste time and effort on this guy, we should make an example of him and put him to death under the 'old-school' laws of high treason or espionage, whether inocent or not (those intelligent enough know the "real" truth about his guilt and complicity in at the least, "un-Canadian activities"). His value in the world and Canada would be greater served as an example to put the fear of God into those people. They may be able to act and do what ever they want in their deserts but, Canada MUST STAND for Canada and it's own standards which incidentally, are or were regarded very highly amongst the advanced and civilized people of the world. He must die, if only to serve as a deterant to those barbarian kerrs.

  2. Wed Sep 07, 2005 10:58 pm
    I find it disgusting that someone would put such little value on human life.

    This is not something to make light of. What is happening to this man could happen to any of us. The real problem is the use of secret courts and classified information. Look how well that served Arar Maher.

    Should we detain people because they make us scared, they have different pigment of skin or they observe different cultural practices?

    This is lunacy at best. Hypocracy in practice. We expect foreign governments to act in their citizens best interests, and we can't do the same? This is another shameful example of Canadian officials taking a page out of the US book (Patriot Act). They haven't the imagination or guts to make their own decisions.

    The rule of law that this great nation was founded on is being watered down, for 'security'. So that our great leaders can protect us from our 'enemy'. (The ones they created through their greed and contempt of human rights outside of our country). Whatever happened to 'innocent until proven guilty' or the right to see a lawyer and hear the evidence against you? How can one defend one's self if he doesn't know the evidence against him? What threat does one pose when locked up indefinitely with no contact to the outside world?

    They need us to protect them, not the other way around. They need us to give away our freedoms, so that they can control the world around us. Lulled into a false sense of security we would be nothing but sheep. Baaaaa!

    They are the ones who are afraid of losing the current world order in which they enjoy the priveleged life.

    SAY NO TO SECRET DETENTIONS - SAY NO TO FACISM

    Read about the Nuremburg trials....eerily familiar to what is going on today.....

  3. Thu Sep 08, 2005 12:15 am
    Ohhh... I'm glad you explained why he is in prison on a security certificate. It's because he had a different pigment of skin and observed different cultural practices. So by that logic, why isn't half of Toronto now in custody? Wait... that's right... only a few are actually dangerous (which has nothing to do with their skin colour).

    How many people are detained on security certificates? 10? 20? Wow. Sure drums up the facist state reference you inferred. Yep, we're well on the way down that slippery slope. Marching the sheep to their camps any day now. Thankfully, anon, you'll have your seat at the bottom before me (cause they watch these subversive sites and have already pinned you by your IP).

    Arar Maher is a tradgedy. One that should be looked at with the utmost scrutiny. Those responsible should be punished and held accountable. But he wasn't held in Canada on a security certificate. He was victim of a collossal blunder and screw up (intentional or not - hopefully we find out) by our government.

    I do agree that these people should be subject to a trial... but perhaps not public if details would endanger covert contacts or methods. Since we allow the Supreme Court to make our laws, maybe they should hear these cases and the real evidence in private and rule on each individual.

    Someone who should be on one of those certificates is the Kahdr kid (heck, the whole family should be rounded up). In their case, if Pakistan doesn't want them back, I'm with Gator - axe them. Send the rest of the family to join the father. After a wonderful trial of course.

  4. Thu Sep 08, 2005 6:02 pm
    gatorx12

    If you have the evidence that is needed for this individual to be incarcerated then you should produce it. Or are you already in some way resposible for his illegal incarceration? Have you lied this person into custody?Announced this person guilty to our all to willing to throw innocent people in jail RCMP?

    If you want to crucify someone on hearsay or because an out of control Canadian security agency tells us everything containing this person is "secret" then you are about as representative of Canadian values as something picked out of a pig's nostril.

    ---
    "And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche

  5. Tue Sep 13, 2005 3:46 pm
    The gestapo the RCMP are not. You make them sound competent and calculating. 4Canada, you are making accusations as wild as those supposedly made in secret against this guy. You don't know what evidence they have against him, only his family's stance that he is guilty of nothing. That's what Atta's family said about him too. Funny, he still drove a plane into a building. Some Canadian kid from BC was killed by Russians in Chechnya. His family claimed he was innocent and would not be anywhere near Chechnya. Funny how he's still dead with a gun in his hand in Chechnya.

    I don't like the concept of detention without trial. However, I can totally see why we don't want an open trial in all cases. As I said before, let the Supreme court decide, behind closed doors. If there is enough evidence, put him away or deport him, no more questions asked.

  6. Wed Sep 14, 2005 5:56 am
    I listened to much of the Maher Arar trial and I do not believe that our RCMP or CSIS are actually working to keep Canadians safe. When they can give anyone's personal information to a foreign country without any questions asked they are not working for us and our safety.

    What specific example can you give me of information that needs to be kept secret from the general public for security reasons?

    ---
    "And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche

  7. Wed Sep 14, 2005 4:16 pm
    Well if I gave a specific example it wouldn't be a secret now would it?

    But... information obtained from a source that just by revealing that the information was known would blow the cover of the source is secret and needs to be kept from the public. For instance, if your source was one of 3 people that knew the operational details of a specific terrorist attack. Person A is the source. Person B is in jail. Person C is the primary terrorist who is planning other operations as well and is in contact with other cells as well as person A. If the operational details came to light, and were known as the reason person B was in jail, person A (the source) would have a very short life expectancy.

    That would be a good reason for a "secret" detention.

    I agree that CSIS and the RCMP are not working to keep us safe. I would say they are barely working. A bunch of paper pushers. But even idiots get lucky once in a while. That's why I'd like a closed trial by the Supreme Court to decide this.

  8. Fri Sep 16, 2005 5:52 am
    Would that be like the "White horse souce"? That is the name that Michael from What Really Happened uses for some of this so-called intelligence. The sources like Achmed Chalabi and "Curveball". You' re still giving far too much credit to these so-called sources. Many of them could have an agenda of their own so your example has not improved my opinion of jailing people on more than "he/she said so" or keeping things in coverup.

    And are you saying that these idiots have gotten lucky this time? And if you are, then again, how would you or the other poster I responded to know that? That's why I think I can fairly ask did you or the other poster put these people in jail? The only possible way you could condemn them with certainty is if you were personally involved.

    How many times is being unlucky acceptable to you?
    How many surveillance cameras is just right when the majority of us are not criminals?

    For me secrecy has shown itself to be very unhealthy in our homes, in our churches, in our governments and in our judicial systems.





    ---
    "And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news