In Decency We Trust

Posted on Wednesday, October 27 at 10:48 by Jim Callaghan
There has been a lot of chatter about what sort of President the USA (and the rest of us) will wind up with. Most of the talk consists of “We want Bush,” or, “We don’t want Bush.” I don’t remember anyone ordering a particular type of President. So here is the kind I want. Most important, a decent person. Sound silly? But we desperately need somebody who will say “I’m sorry.” Sorry for what? “Sorry for the failure of the United States to lead the developed world to a better life." Mind you, we sanctimonious Canadians also could use a push in that direction. We joined the US in Kosovo, Afghanistan and, to a lesser degree, in Iraq. That qualifies us as war criminals. A couple of years ago I suggested to our recently retired Minister of External Affairs that we should go to the World Court and asked to be tried. He went ballistic. But every nation in NATO is by legal definition a war criminal. And has engaged in terrorist activities. So let’s all confess. There has been a lot of talk in this campaign about alternatives in Iraq. Forget it. There is only one. Quit or grow more brutal. If the soldiers who are there haven’t quit fighting yet, they soon will. I was in Korea and I saw American draftees who had made a rational decision to keep their heads down. They were not going to die on foreign soil. I didn’t blame them, after all, we Canadians were there as volunteers. They (the Americans) had not asked to be there. The same decision not to die abroad is being made in Iraq by soldiers who may have started as volunteers, but are rapidly becoming draftees. Who can blame them? Every day the memory of Vietnam grows stronger. The troops in Iraq see the same progression taking place there. Poor people, (American and Iraqi) are being killed to make the world safe for rich people. Just as in Vietnam, the forces are learning they have been lied to. Just as in Vietnam they will soon refuse to fight and start fragging their gung-ho officers. (Using fragmentation grenades to temper the enthusiasm for combat of your leaders). When that happens things become plain. Pull out, or hire even more mercenaries to do even more killing. There has to be another way. Here is the road map. The new president should go back and read Eisenhower’s “Cross of Iron” speech. Then read his speech warning of the military industrial complex. When he has learned what the United States foremost soldier thought about war, he can legitimately defend the decision to halt the practice of terrorism. Some people will protest that being decent somehow implies cowardice. Armchair warriors who have never seen or smelled the results of bombing, shelling and napalm will claim that fighting is necessary to bring peace. They can go somewhere and fight to their hearts content. Meanwhile, let’s take a look at the society a little good will from the world’s most powerful leader might bring about. We will use a time honoured device from science fiction. The Alternate Universe. It is now 1959 and John Kennedy has just been elected. Like Eisenhower, Kennedy had experienced war. John Kennedy was no angel, but we will pretend he was. After his inauguration he flies to Cuba, puts his arm around Castro’s shoulder and says “Good for you, Fidel, you got rid of those gangsters. How can we help you?” Consider what might have followed. No Bay of Pigs. No Cuban missile crisis. The same generosity of spirit might have led Kennedy to Vietnam. Not North or South Vietnam but Vietnam. And again he speaks “Congratulations on winning your independence. We did the same thing a long time ago. If we can help, just ask.” Just think. No bombing. No Laos, no Cambodia, no Mai Lai. No tens of thousands of American dead, no millions of Asians dead. No thousands of veterans committing suicide. We could go on and on and on. No upheaval in Chile, or Nicaragua, no Iraq, no Grenada, no Kosovo. Maybe even an uneasy peace in Palestine and Israel. Somewhere back there, in this universe, being decent became normal. The USA now supports the UN. The rule of law determines international conduct. As Winston Churchill said “Better jaw, jaw, than war, war.” Imagine living in a world where the most powerful country is looked at as a friend, not cursed. Imagine living in a world where poverty is rare and hunger unknown. Imagine a world where more whole lot more money is spent on teaching and caring for children than on killing children. Imagine living in a world where fear is not ever present and is not one of the main determinants in how we vote. All this is possible. It only requires the good people in the USA to vote for a good person. And for the rest of us to support those good people. John Keene, Saskatchewan

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Thu Oct 28, 2004 12:24 am
    So your definition of a "good" US leader is one who would have capitulated to communists. It was thanks to strong American leaders (one in particular) that Soviet communism found its proper place on the dustheap of history.

    To Fidel Castro, the US was an enemy, THE enemy. No amount of ass-kissing by Kennedy would have changed that. It would have only emboldened him and his Soviet patrons. A JFK who would have sucked up to Fidel would have also backed down on missiles in Cuba. Appeasers are cowards.

  2. by avatar Milton
    Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:05 am
    And people who post their opinions anonymously are courageous heros, right?

  3. Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:20 am
    Any decent US president usually catches a bullet. Kennedy killed by banker controlled CIA cell, and Reagan attempted assasination, by same people. What did Kennedy want to do? Take money issuance away from the Federal Reserve (a private banking consortium). Reagan wanted to go back to a gold standard. Any decent USA president in the future will stand up to the fiat banking cabal and live to tell about it. Unfortunately, by then, the USA we know will likely not exist.

  4. Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:25 am
    "Appeasers are cowards", yet you want the rest of the world to appease this disgust that is the United States' foreign policy.

    It's easy to call people cowards when you have a nuke pointed at their heads. You militarists sicken me with your phallus-waving, belligerent machismo. Some people wish to enjoy life without needlessly inflicting pain and suffering on others. And they are unable to do so because of sadists like you preying on them.


    ---
    Kory Yamashita

    "What lies behind us and what lies ahead of us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us." - Oliver Wendell Holmes

  5. Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:15 am
    I don't want anyone to appease anyone. If you think the US is an evil empire, then go ahead, scream your head off. Resist! Do whatever you guys do to make your point.

    Just don't be surprised that there are people who disagree with you. Some of your fellow Canadians want Canada to have a good relationship with the US. Some of your fellow Canadians are not social-democrats. Some of your fellow Canadians believe that the rights of the individual should take precedence over the utopian dreams of the central planners. Don't like it? Well, suck it up.

  6. Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:27 am
    Not enough people know about the "connection" between Kennedy and monetary reform.

    This is getting the word out.

    This is what we need !!



    ---
    "Arrogance is unacceptable. Do it to my face, and I will react" - Jim Callaghan

  7. Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:19 am
    The assertion that Canadians are war criminals is ignorant posturing that you couldn't honestly believe yourself because you know that if it were true, you wouldn't be able to make the assertion. Countries that commit war crimes are always dictatorships of one sort or another.

    Soldiers from democratic countries who commit crimes are charged and imprisoned such as the US soldier who got 8 years for humiliating prisoners, or the Canadian soldier who got 5 years for torturing and killing a Somali prisoner.

    If Canadians must say 'sorry' it should be for not doing more to free people from tyranny and oppression in countries like the Sudan, Iran, Cuba, North Korea, China, Somalia, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Zimbabwe, Vietnam...

  8. Thu Oct 28, 2004 7:47 am
    The U.S. idea of the "rights of the individual" pertain only to certain types of individual. Rich. White. Business owner. No free social programs for the masses, the bare minimum at most. Keep it (for the most part) so that the only people who aren't deeply affected by those (medical, for example) costs are... Rich. White. Business owners. Organize policy so that the gap between the rich and the poor is well-defined and well-defended, with the aim of keeping those who are in (political and corporate) power right where they are, namely... Rich. White. Business owners. Dangle the masses just above the poverty line with no safety nets so that they can't organize and resist the rediculously obvious misallocation of wealth and increasing frequency of straight up white-collar thievery (wtf are service fees for using my bank card, that ought to be illegal. It's MY money I'm basically REQUIRED to put in a bank, how can they CHARGE me to take some out? bullshit). The list goes on and on. Oh but yeah, social democracy with an actual eye for all peoples, well that's just selfish and naive. Who care about the happiness and comfort of the poor and regular folk, anyway. Appffh. Americans are rediculous. They seem almost happy to fuck themselves over in favour of the upper 2%. The entire world looks at the U.S. and shakes its head, yet somehow the States doesn't understand why...

    Remember, labour creates all wealth. Those four words ought to be tatooed on the forehead of every C.E.O. That way regular folk would be able to see their true worth staring right back at them. Wishful thinking I suppose, as if upper management would ever mingle with the common folk.

    ---
    Revolution.

  9. by avatar Milton
    Thu Oct 28, 2004 12:35 pm
    If Canadians must say "we are sorry", it should be for being accomplices with right wing democrazies while they raped and pillaged the world and pointed their media mouthpieces at any weapon of mass destraction they could think of.

  10. Thu Oct 28, 2004 1:51 pm
    Please provide an example of a right-wing democracy that has 'raped and pillaged' the world, or are you talking about other worlds that only you know about?

  11. Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:14 pm
    Wow, buddy, the article itself is about a right wing regime raping and pillaging the world! But yes, another universe would be nice. As for individual rights, well, in order for ALL people to enjoy their individual rights, wealth distribution must be such so that ALL people can achieve their dreams. But the current system only tramples on the individual rights of the majority, while those at the top live in psychopathic privilege! And i want good relations with the USA too! But since their ruling class is a bunch of jerks, and our ruling class is a bunch of lackeys, then no such good relationship is possible! And, we can call ourselves democratic all we want, it doesn`t mean we`re free!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  12. Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:46 pm
    The article itself is about an author who doesn't understand history, politics or ethics. The author is on a confused rant against the US, probably due to an inferiority complex that he feels entitles him to put a chip on his shoulder.

    So a single example of a right-wing democracy 'raping and pillaging' the world is not too much to ask.

  13. Thu Oct 28, 2004 4:09 pm
    <i>Please provide an example of a right-wing democracy that has 'raped and pillaged' the world</i><p> Your wish <a href='http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=201062'>granted.</a><p> <p>---<br>"If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill <br />

  14. Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:31 pm
    Anon, you really are out to lunch in this thread.

    Just look at the advisor:

    John H. Marburger III !!

    No big money there, EH ?

    The US admin will stoop to the LOWEST possible level to acheive their goals": lie; steal; cheat; hide the truth; ignore reality; and if you wish, I could go on for at least 5 more pages.

    They are ALL ABOUT big money !! Their money.

    You are wrong, admit it for once.


    ---
    "Arrogance is unacceptable. Do it to my face, and I will react" - Jim Callaghan



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news