The Canadian and US governments have generally responded to this instability with interventions designed to restore stable low prices for conventional fossil fuels. Even while ratifying the Kyoto accord (which is designed to reduce CO2 emissions), Ottawa is doing everything it can, including ruling out a carbon tax, and exempting the auto industry, to ensure that the oil and gas and automotive industries are minimally affected. While this may be good short-term politics it is bad economics and lousy environmental policy. And it won?t prevent even steeper price increases in the near future. To avoid a serious energy crisis in coming decades, citizens in the industrial countries should actually be urging their governments to come to international agreement on a persistent, orderly, predictable, and steepening series of oil and natural gas price hikes over the next two decades. The present world energy market obscures the true price of hydrocarbon fuels and inhibits the development of alternatives.
This argument comes in two parts. The first is neatly summarized in a 1998 report by the Washington-based International Centre for Technology Assessment on The Real Price of Gas. The purpose of this report was to quantify the numerous external costs associated with the use of fossil-fuelled motor vehicles that are not reflected in US consumer prices. Such hidden costs range from various tax and direct subsidies to the oil industry from governments, through publicly funded infrastructure costs, to the health and environmental costs associated with burning fossil fuels (e.g., breathing ?second-hand exhaust?). These direct and indirect subsidies seriously distort energy markets, burden the economy with rampant inefficiencies, and in the process, are helping to destabilize the world's climate.
Depending on the range of subsidies included and the quality of available data, the total unaccounted cost of fossil fuel use in the US was found to lie between $559 billion and $1.7 trillion dollars annually. A fuller social cost accounting for the use of fossil fuel would therefore result in a gasoline price per gallon of between US$ 5.60 and US$ 15.14. In Canadian terms, this would be roughly equivalent to a price per litre of between C$2.20 and C$5.95, or three to eight or nine times recent Vancouver prices (i.e., before the current price surge related to reduced exports from Venezuela and the threat of war in Iraq). In other words, even with the burden of existing taxes, prevailing energy prices do not tell the truth about the costs of using fossil energy. North Americans pay a fraction of the price they would pay for gas in a perfectly functioning market.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Editorial Notes ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
More articles by/about William Rees are available at the Global Public Media website at
www.globalpublicmedia.com/people/william_rees . -BA
Article found at :
http://www.energybulletin.net/newswire.php?id=3372
Original article :
http://www.globalpublicmedia.com/articles/263
Yeah, we should stop subsidizing private (foreign at that) oil companies, but the government needs to be filled with people who give a damn. It must come from government IMO. Industry has the technology now to do great things, and they don't care--profits first.
Charging us an arificially high price and lying about an impending oil shock won't impress anyone.
"The point is that higher energy prices are needed now to signal the real scarcity to come. Without higher prices we will not invest in the technologies needed for a smooth transition to the post-petroleum age. Without higher prices we will not conserve the fossil energy needed to manufacture those alternative technologies. Without higher prices, the remaining life expectancy of industrial society (as energy analyst Richard Duncan has frequently argued) may well be less than 40 years! " <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Good economics would charge the true scarcity price for oil, which may or may not be higher than the prevailing market price. Rees is arguing that the true price would "internalize" the costs of externalities. In a perfectly competitive neoclassical world, there are no externalities, so the presence of externalities implies that the price charged is not accounting for the full costs of the good being sold. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
One good documentary is called "The End of Suburbia" and should be playing in Edmonton this January. It discusses how the suburbs depend low, distorted prices for energy, and how highway construction is subsidized to make more efficient uses such as public transit or trains economically unfeasible. <br />
<br />
To see the full implications for the impending oil shock go to <a href="http://www.dieoff.org">www.dieoff.org</a> and read a paper with "Olduvai Gorge" in the title. It highlights the importance of energy in economic production. <br />
<br />
Furthermore, monetary value does not always represent the intrinsic value of a good. In order to buy oil, most countires have to buy US dollars. However, since middle eastern nations are discussing prices in euros, this would mean central banks could dump their US dollar holdings in favor of the euro. This is one reason why the US dollar is in freefall. The world is losing faith in the unbacked Greenback, so higher prices in terms of US dollars does not imply that we will see investment.
---
Dave Ruston
Canada is a wasteful coutnry, and we have totally underdeveloped transit in our cities, but that doesn't mean all is lost....the U.S. IS lost, because they are a coutnry of suburbs, that's it.
Export taxes should be upped on natural gas, oil and electricity and a significant portion of these taxes should be used for the research, design and manufacture of renewable energy sources and the infrastructure necessary to utilize these sources. Then all of Canada should be retrofitted, then we would have a wealth of renewable energy sources to offer the world when the fossil fuels run out.
Take a long look at the developments in Solar power technology.Why is it so f**king expensive?The oil companies would lose big dollars if everyone hand solar turbines and wind vanes to generate thetere own,CONSTANTLY RENEWABLE<ALWAYS THERE FRIGGING POWER SOURCE!!!!!!!!!!
Thats why it cost a gadzillion bucks just set up a few wind turbines on Vancouver Island.How stupid are we?!?! Anyone can see that the technology invovled is as old as the hills on granmas chest!?!?! It don't cost that f**ing much to build a fan and supersize that damn thing!
Bottom line,CORPORATE GREED!!!!!!!Screw the oil companies!!!
A final word,Canada needs HIGHER fuel prices!!!!???? Mate,you need a kick in the kahonies!!! I have a family of four.I will not sacrifice there well being to go work my ass off just to pay f**ing greedy utility companies and oil companies.At what i earn on my job,I should be able to get by,NOPE,Those companies siphon off more than 30% off my paycheck.I don't know where the hell you are coming from,but,a country that is rich in resource like Canada should not be lead by the nose like a mongrel while getting porked up the arse by neighborhood Dobie!
Higher prices,Screw you mate!
---
A little peice of heaven is found in good deeds.
---
A little peice of heaven is found in good deeds.