Now, before I go further, I should be more specific about what types of problems I'm talking about. So here's a quick list, which will only grow with time, I'm sure:
drug use and trafficking, poverty, pollution, large-city infrastructure expansion, small city neglect, transportation, the looming energy crisis, organized crime, government corruption, economic inequality, etc, etc...
Those, of course, are pretty much all domestic issues. There are many, many more. And I think it's time we took advantage of this new and very democratic medium at our disposal and actually solve some problems.
I'll bet that there are solutions to a LOT of our problems that are a hell of a lot more effective than pouring in $$$ or privatising.
I think the public would enthusiastically embrace real solutions instead of the semblance of solutions that they're used to. Lets do what the government is too corrupt to do and the opposition is too petty to do. Lets be what we've been claiming to be: progressive.
Hell, lets do what Canadians are best at: reluctantly succeeding where all others have eagerly failed.
-KY
Comments
view comments in forum
You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.
Kevin Gagnon
Yes, the impending energy crisis has been impending for a while but that doesn\'t mean it doesn\'t exist. Wake up.
As for your comments on oil consumption and your support for my assertion that there will be an oil crisis, can you post some links to these charts and sources you\'ve mentioned? My declaration was intuitive. It was based on political and military observations, some sustainability theory, and plain ol\' common sense. But I\'d rather be able to back it up with hard facts if possible.
-KY
---
Kory Yamashita
"What lies behind us and what lies ahead of us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us."
-Oliver Wendell Holmes
A solutions section to discuss ways to solve problems would be great. Before you do an action, don\'t you need to have an idea of what you are asking for?
Perhaps that\'s why Eaton\'s went under. Not enough catalogues. Eaton\'s cancelled theirs, Sears has like 3 or 4 a year.
Never underestimate the power of the babes in lingerie!
But if you are, I am impressed that you are so interested in the future of Canada, now if we can get the rest of the 18 yrs olds interested enough to vote, we\'ll be making progress.
Whelan, I agree wholeheartedly. The youth of this country SHOULD be voting, even if for no other reason than selfish foresight. But with the right to vote comes the responsibility of societal autonomy and that means looking out for the those of us too young or otherwise unable to vote. And so in a lot of cases, I\'m actually fairly glad that most 18 year olds don\'t vote. One of my friends told me today that he thought Paul Martin was doing a good job of \"cleaning up after Chretien\". Apparently, some of finer nuances in the media articles are being misread: the parts about Paul Martin being #2 in the government for 2/3 of Chretien\'s term.
But that\'s another story. Point is: youth (like the rest of the population) should vote, but they ought to know what they\'re voting for first.
-KY