Newly Uncovered Commerce Department Documents Detail “Security And Prosperity Pa

Posted on Tuesday, September 26 at 20:18 by Milton
The Commerce Department also provided substantial documentation concerning the North American Competitiveness Council. The council consists of 30 members, 10 each from the United States, Mexico and Canada. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Council of the Americas “agreed to jointly lead the U.S. Secretariat.” Documents describing the North American Competitiveness Council’s launch, its recommendations, and meeting minutes were also uncovered by Judicial Watch’s FOIA request, which was filed on August 15, 2006. The council’s recommendations to the North American “partnership” include advice on how to handle an international disease outbreak: “It is also essential that throughout a pandemic all borders and major roads remain open…” With respect to border enforcement, the council recommends that, “A reasonable grace period should be established at border crossings, during which time people lacking documents are educated about their options and allowed to pass.” The council also makes recommendations on energy issues such as the “…enhanced integration of the Mexican [electricity] grid with that of the United States.” “Many Americans are interested in where this North American partnership process is going,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Given all that is at stake, the federal government has a responsibility to make sure this process is transparent and open to public scrutiny -- so the release of these documents is an important step forward.” The newly released documents include contact lists, meeting agenda and minutes, recommendations, fact sheets, speakers’ quotes, action items, and procedural guidelines. The records are available on the Judicial Watch Internet site: http://www.judicialwatch.org/5979.shtml [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on September 27, 2006]

Note: http://www.judicialwatc...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Sep 27, 2006 9:42 am
    So do you think we'll have to go through the Information act to get the low down on the Banff meeting? I printed the 7 sections from this meeting and that link should keep updated on any new developments I would think.

    ---
    "And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche

  2. by Innes
    Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:10 am
    Attempts to get the Canadian media to cover this story has fallen on deaf ears. However, Lou Dobbs on CNN did do a piece on it this evening.

  3. by avatar Milton
    Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:51 am
    The following article has many links to important info.<br />
    <br />
    North American Forum: The Secret Cabal of Trinational Elites <br />
    by Terry Melanson<br />
    <a href="http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/North_American_Forum.htm">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/North_American_Forum.htm</a><br />
    <br />
    <br />
    <br />
    A North American Advisory Council. To ensure a regular injection of creative energy into the various efforts related to North American integration, the three governments should appoint an independent body of advisers. This body should be composed of eminent persons from outside government, appointed to staggered multiyear terms to ensure their independence. Their mandate would be to engage in creative exploration of new ideas from a North American perspective and to provide a public voice for North America. A complementary approach would be to establish private bodies that would meet regularly or annually to buttress North American relationships, along the lines of the Bilderberg or Wehrkunde conferences, organized to support transatlantic relations. (Emphasis mine)<br />
    <br />
    As far as I can tell, this startling admission has been overlooked. The "North American Advisory Council" has indeed been established; and as suggested in the report, it has been patterned after the Bilderberg Group — "the notoriously secretive council of western political leaders, industrialists and financiers which derived its name from the hotel in which it met for the first time in 1954, with funds provided by the CIA" (Hugh Wilford, "Calling the Tune? The CIA, the British Left and the Cold War, 1945-1960," in The Cultural Cold War in Western Europe, 1945-60, 47. Of particular interest, in the same book, is Valerie Aubourg's "Organizing Atlanticism: The Bilderberg Group and the Atlantic Institute, 1952-1963", 92-109). <p>---<br><br />
    "Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."<br />
    (Albert Einstein)

  4. Fri Sep 29, 2006 8:25 am
    Here is a great printable document so you can share with all Canadians the future...we call it the USSA<br />
    Unconstitutional Stalin Style Amerika<br />
    <a href="http://www.canadianactionparty.ca/temp/North_American_Union/Rather_be_Canadian.pdf">http://www.canadianactionparty.ca/temp/North_American_Union/Rather_be_Canadian.pdf</a><p>---<br>If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  5. Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:26 pm
    Flat Cath,

    I've downloaded your informative ad/poster and will put them around our bulletin boards. I'm also sending them around to my address book and a copy to my Con MP/muzzled patsy. I'm also going to ask Avi Lewis if he would consider doing something on this, although there likely isn't a documentary on this subject as of yet and that is how "The Big Picture with Avi Lewis" is formated. Maybe W5?

    ---
    "And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche

  6. Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:53 pm
    Great 4Canada. I'm thinking this would make a great protest song....not in the USSA...we'd rather be Canadian!

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  7. by Wraun
    Fri Sep 29, 2006 4:18 pm
    Not in the USSA
    Rather be Canadian eh
    Not in the US
    Not in the US
    Not in the USSA

    Well those Newfie girls really knock me out
    They leave the states behind
    And BC girls really scream & shout
    Anne Murray's always on my my my my my my my my my mind



    ---
    Dear Abby, Dear Abby my fountain pen leaks, my wife hollers at me and the kids are all freaks

  8. by Innes
    Sat Sep 30, 2006 2:09 am
    In a meeting at Washington, D.C. on August 15, 2006 there was a Trilateral Private Sector Meeting of the North American Competitiveness Council set up by the SPP. Besides the CEOs on the council there was a another group of representatives in attendance from an organization called the "NNCC Canada Secretariat," all members of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives including Thomas d'Aquino. Each country had its own Secretariat.

    The purpose of the meeting was to set up the priorities for the SPP which they were to present to the President's of the U.S. and Mexico and the Prime Minister of Canada by September 15. The priorities they set out were: border crossing facilitation (including security, infrastructure, supply chain management, transport and logistics, customs reform); regulatory convergence; and energy integration.

    The three priorities was divided among the Secretariats (e.g. for Canada the CCCE). Canada was to deal with border crossing facilitation, the U.S. was to work on regularity convergence, and Mexico on energy integration.

    It seems to me that what is happening here is the creation of an alternative "bureaucracy" controlled by the largest North American corporations: essentially a parallel private sector government which directs the priorities of the "elected" government.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.



Latest Editorials

more articles »

Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news