Culture Of Violence Unavoidable In Capitalism

Posted on Tuesday, January 15 at 09:03 by siamdave
Some will struggle through to the top, most will not. And it's nothing new - pretty much every great fortune began with someone like this - check out Joe Kennedy, for example.

If they really wanted to solve the problems in the schools, they would be talking about things like this, about how our dysfunctional, hypocritical society leads to this kind of violence in the school as naturally as beating a dog will turn it violent. But they can't even acknowledge things like this without blowing the top off the box, which not doing is their prime directive, so they do their best to shuffle things around to try to calm things down when something causing unrest to the indoctrinated masses happens (thier unspoken contract is that in return for the self-lobotomisation and lives of drudgery they at least get some security and the pretense of 'democracy'). But they never will, until they start looking at things honestly.

Don't hold your breath. Rulers with essentially absolute power don't give up easily. You're going to see a lot more cops and ID chips and physical intimidation control before you see anything like talking about the truth.

And that's what Canada looks like today from On Green Island.



Note: Culture of silence impe...

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by Innes
    Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:19 pm
    Whether this is corporate statism or an extreme form of capitalism is a matter of debate. Whatever we call it it is an evolution of capitalism back to the form of imperialism that it was meant to replace.

    By removing barriers between corporate and government power politicians have created what might better be called global fascism. In this system, major conflicts of interests are acceptable such as corporate CEOs creating the government policies that apply to their own operations (referred to as self-regulation).

    Corporate CEOs get to decide how much risk they are willing to take with the health and welfare of their clients while the clients are denied imput. The number one priority in this kind of system is the profitability of the mega-producer or commercial interest.

    I believe it would be accurate to refer to this system as corporate statism except that it is practiced on an international basis so that the power of the individual state is undermined through international agreements that are negotiated and implemented on behalf multi-national corporate interests. They go well beyond simple trading relationships to give power to the corporation over the operation of democracy. They actually use the state to destroy the power of the state and the body politic.

  2. by avatar tehowe
    Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:11 pm
    It's an important debate to have, though, as it determines the direction we need to head in to stop this thing.

    Otherwise, I agree. It's fuedalism, lifted from the medieval era into the 21st century, where the new fiefdoms are to be technocratic rather than agrarian.

  3. by avatar tehowe
    Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:21 pm
    siamdave: I'm afraid that I don't agree. It's my opinion that the issuance of fiat currency and its control by the state and its corporate partners is actually one of the fundamental problems underlying this mess. The natural flows of value between individuals needs no such regulation, which simply invites corruption at the highest levels. it's the coercive control and manipulation of these flows that distorts the market, and that's going to happen unless currency is decentralized. Granted, and I gather you might be a CAP supporter, decentralizing to the state level from the international level would be a good first step - but people must be free to settle on their own hard currency, something of objective value.

    Isn't it fascinating how this is becoming a real issue in the blogsphere? Interesting times - and I will have a look at your book, thanks! Cheers.

  4. by siljan
    Wed Jan 16, 2008 5:28 am
    some great analogys on capitalism;

    "capitalism breeds gangland wastelands with genetically modified 'reststops' in between"

    "capitalism is a system which separates the producers from the means of production, and only admits them to produce at all as and when some speculator sees an immidiate profit in doing so"

    and there must be something really desirable in the famous words "from each according to his ability , to each according to his needs" beacuse when asked about it in a survey a great number of Americans thought it was written in their Constitution.

  5. by siljan
    Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:39 pm
    oops... make that analogies, sorry.<br />
    <br />
    more on capitalism and violence and war;<br />
    <a href="http://freethoughtweekly.blogspot.com/2007/04/capitalism-is-war.html">http://freethoughtweekly.blogspot.com/2007/04/capitalism-is-war.html</a>



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news