States Negotiating With Terrorists Is Nothing New

Posted on Sunday, September 17 at 14:21 by 4Canada
How indeed? One could also ask how Canada, or any civilized state, could talk to Saudi Arabia, where a woman can be stoned to death simply for the "crime" of having been raped. One could also ask Rae how he felt in 2003 when he journeyed to Sri Lanka to talk to Tamil Tiger terrorists — the original suicide bombers — about a negotiated settlement to that country's civil war. The official explanation behind Rae's mission — heartily supported by Ottawa at the time — was that for ordinary Sri Lankans, anything was better than more war. The truth is that civilized countries talk to terrorists all the time. After years of terrorism in Northern Ireland, Britain's Tony Blair negotiated a deal with the Irish Republican Army. In 1962, France ended its bitter colonial war in Algeria by handing over control of that country to the terrorist Front de libération National. In 1990, South Africa's apartheid regime realized it had no option except to talk to the African National Congress rebels it had characterized as terrorists. In 1948, Britain negotiated the details of its pullout from Palestine with a Zionist movement that included terrorists. Even Israel has negotiated prisoner exchanges with organizations, such as Hezbollah, that it considers terrorist. http://tinyurl.com/lksgz [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on September 18, 2006]

Note: http://tinyurl.com/lksgz

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by alive
    Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:20 pm
    some good points here, the answer is very simple: it was Jack Layton who proposed it, so the media naturally have to downplay it!
    the real question is: do the players want a settlement?
    To me it looks as if the war machine makes money for certain parties, so why shut it down?

  2. Mon Sep 18, 2006 12:44 am
    There is obviously a need to keep the war going at all costs.
    Even if one were to talk to the Taliban and ask them to discontinue what we think is wrong could they not come to an agreement and cease hostilities. They wouldn't beat their women and everyone would be happy. Then support them in their quest to rid their country of drugs and rebuild their infrastructure together. Noone would have to die...
    But there is of course the pipeline they don't want.
    Never mind. I guess peace is the pipe dream of the logical.

  3. by RPW
    Mon Sep 18, 2006 4:35 am
    For media inquiries:
    Alexander Swann
    613.601.4786
    Alexander.swann@bobrae.ca

    As a small step, I am sending Mr. Rae the website of this article, and highlighting Mr. Rae's visit to Sri Lanka. May I suggest others to the same or similar? I would be curious to see if he even bothers to respond.

    ---
    "Son, if you wanna get ahead in this world, never work for another man as long as you live."

  4. by Wraun
    Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:19 pm
    Yes, who wants peace in the Middle East? Maybe people who live in the West Bank/Gaza or maybe John/Jane Doebiniwitz but certainly not Barak, Sharon, Netanyahu, Rabin, Bush Jr, Bush Sr, Clinton, Reagan, Ford, Nixon, et al. If someone/anyone really wanted peace it would've been achieved by now. It's been a half a frickin century for crissake!

    ---
    Dear Abby, Dear Abby my fountain pen leaks, my wife hollars at me and the kids are all freaks



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news